Matt Kirkcaldie
@matttkk.bsky.social
1.9K followers 660 following 250 posts
Neuroscientist obsessed with brain structure and comparative neuroanatomy. They’re not circuits. It’s not wiring. Cortex is a resonant mesh. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Matt-Kirkcaldie [ image by https://mattcoyle.net ]
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
matttkk.bsky.social
The point that needs to be hammered: of course there are fantastic profits to be made if you can get the public to pay for the facility for businesses to use. That’s the covert cost-benefit analysis which drives the political enthusiasm.
@andrewwilkiemp.bsky.social
matttkk.bsky.social
Sweetness Follows (just ahead of Drive)
matttkk.bsky.social
I think you may have misspelled “windy” there
matttkk.bsky.social
I hope the shame of Musk’s continued fellowship eventually penetrates and stirs you to action.
matttkk.bsky.social
Ooh that’s a tough reach, for even the most committed pedant.
matttkk.bsky.social
Oops, didn’t realise it was so contested!
matttkk.bsky.social
An interesting aside is what it means to “recognize” a place - but of course that’s the whole question!
matttkk.bsky.social
Hmm - well unlike gif/jiff there’s at least a clear answer on this one!
matttkk.bsky.social
Insane video, is that a macrophage showing up at the end?
Also a note for those new to apoptosis - it’s from Greek “apo-“ and “ptosis” so you pronounce it appo-tosis, not a-pop-tosis.
Reposted by Matt Kirkcaldie
markrubin.bsky.social
Report on Australian Higher Education finds:

🔹️ Council members have no lived experience of universities

🔹️ Council members have COIs with consultancy firms

🔹️ Council meetings are closed affairs that lack transparency

🔹️ Leaders' exorbitant salaries could not be justified
One submission said leaders’ salaries could not be “justified by the quality of executive decision-making, nor by the scope of executive duties. The core business of a university – teaching and research – is co-ordinated virtually entirely by ordinary non-executive staff”.
matttkk.bsky.social
I know they won the Nobel Prize and all, but I still think the discovery of how spatial awareness is assembled in vertebrate brains is underrated - the most exciting thing in neuroscience in the last 50 years. Literally seeing the brain build a map and use it to navigate, the basis of all behaviour.
matttkk.bsky.social
Yeah, but if her thesis applied the principles of QM in analysing stellar spectra it’s based on QM, whether the phrase had been coined or no. It didn’t just spring into existence in 1925.
matttkk.bsky.social
What’s the basis of spectral lines if not quantum physics? Not sure you read the article.
matttkk.bsky.social
Fantastic, essential piece of scientific history, key work from an unheralded pioneer. We’ve only known that the stars are hydrogen and helium for a hundred years.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin ✨ figured out what stars are made of ✨ when she was just 25. 🔭🧪

Her PhD thesis basically established the Harvard astro department — at a time when Harvard didn't officially allow woman students.

I wrote this little profile to mark the 100th anniversary of her thesis:
matttkk.bsky.social
I have those PDFs which were on the CDs, I think about 20 issues from the early years, but it sounds like you’ve got those.
Reposted by Matt Kirkcaldie
olivia.science
Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues. Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe. Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles
Reposted by Matt Kirkcaldie
matttkk.bsky.social
As I posted elsewhere, it’s worth knowing that it’s always been a commercial for-profit site. Its “edu” address was granted in the very early days of domain registration before proof of status was required, and has never been rescinded. Their terms of service have handed away rights for decades too.
matttkk.bsky.social
It has always been a commercial for-profit site. Its “edu” address was granted in the very early days of domain registration before proof of status was required, and has never been rescinded. Their terms of service have handed away rights for decades too.
Reposted by Matt Kirkcaldie
psychopharmres.bsky.social
We’re looking for Australian clinicians working with people who are seeking help with their substance use to share the stories of their wins. Find out more and complete the brief, confidential survey here: bit.ly/3GpQTXP