Max Kagan
@maxkagan.bsky.social
310 followers 1.2K following 110 posts
Postdoc at Columbia Business School studying partisan sorting at work. https://www.maxkagan.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Max Kagan
mattgrossmann.bsky.social
Companies are hiring many more internal policy specialists than lobbyists; it is a much larger investment in politics and internal expertise
www.andrewbenjaminhall.com/HallSun25.pdf
Reposted by Max Kagan
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
Proposal for how to fix family wise error rates.

For every uncorrected p value you must add an extra letter to the claim.

“Eating chocolate maaaaaaaaay be associated with lower rates of stroke”
maxkagan.bsky.social
Excellent reference for those, like me, who can always benefit from a refresher on statistical power
Reposted by Max Kagan
rachelporter.bsky.social
📢 Thrilled to share our new article introducing CampaignView—a comprehensive open-source dataset of congressional candidate campaign bios and policy platforms (2018–2022). Paper + data here: campaignview.org & doi.org/10.7910/DVN/... 🧵1/4
maxkagan.bsky.social
Wild times for those of us who study corporate sociopolitical activism
maxkagan.bsky.social
It looks like there is already a Stata MCP, for those who might want such a thing
maxkagan.bsky.social
For that matter, right now there are ~700k people per representative and GA has ~1.3m non-citizen residents, so MTG’s own state would likely lose at least one, maybe 2 reps?
maxkagan.bsky.social
Constitutional questions aside, it isn’t clear to me what the net partisan electoral effect would be? CA and NY would presumably lose representatives (and thus electors), but so would FL and TX?
hansilowang.bsky.social
NEW: GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene says she is introducing a bill requiring a new census "immediately upon enactment" & congressional redistricting using numbers that exclude non-U.S. citizens from census results that the 14th Amendment says must include the “whole number of persons in each state”
I just got off the phone with President Trump!!

I told him about my new bill I am introducing that will save America’s elections from ever being stolen again!

My bill will require the U.S. Census Bureau to conduct a new census immediately upon enactment of the bill. In conducting the new census of the U.S. population, it shall require questions determining the citizenship of each individual, and count US citizens only.
Upon completion of the census, the bill will direct states to immediately begin a redistricting of all U.S. House seats process using only the population of United States citizens.

Thank you President Trump for your strong support of my bill, Making American Elections Great Again!!!

Let’s get this done!!!
maxkagan.bsky.social
Much of my recent research has been thinking critically about whether it is always reasonable to use public campaign finance records as a good way to understand corporate executives' political ideology. So it is pretty striking to see someone "saying the quiet part out loud!"
teddyschleifer.bsky.social
Here's a fun thing that a top donor to Andrew Cuomo's super PAC just told me.
Reposted by Max Kagan
jenvictor.bsky.social
In the political literature this is known as donating for access. It’s very common. Campaign donations should be interpreted as strategic manifestations of political goals, not expressions of true preference.
teddyschleifer.bsky.social
Here's a fun thing that a top donor to Andrew Cuomo's super PAC just told me.
Reposted by Max Kagan
zhaoliresearch.bsky.social
Going to #AOM2025 and working on #nonmarket strategy or know someone who is? Join our PDW on Research Frontiers in Nonmarket Strategy — now in its 8th year!

🗓️ Sat, July 26 | 11:00AM–1:30PM
📍 Bella Center, Auditorium 12
📝 Pre-register by ***July 1***: umdsurvey.umd.edu/jfe/form/SV_...
Qualtrics Survey | Qualtrics Experience Management
The most powerful, simple and trusted way to gather experience data. Start your journey to experience management and try a free account today.
umdsurvey.umd.edu
Reposted by Max Kagan
stefanmueller.bsky.social
📄 @fgilardi.bsky.social created this template for writing abstracts several years ago, and I’ve tried to follow Fabrizio‘s suggestions ever since.

PDF: fabriziogilardi.org/resources/pa...
Everyone agrees that this issue is really important. But we do not know much about this specific question, although it matters a great deal, for these reasons. We approach the problem from this perspective. Our research design focuses on these cases and relies on these data, which we analyze using this method. Results show what we have learned about the question. They have these broader implications.
Reposted by Max Kagan
gelliottmorris.com
Americans who report paying “a lot of attention” to news (everyone on this platform) are (a) in the minority of voters and (b) very, very prone to assuming the other side of the aisle is all extremists. This is counterproductive to broader party efforts at persuasion. I have sources:

🧵
Not all Trump voters "voted for this"
Trump’s policy agenda is very unpopular, including with many of his supporters. To win the next election, Democrats need to welcome regretful Trump voters back onto their side
www.gelliottmorris.com
Reposted by Max Kagan
gelliottmorris.com
Most people consume less than 1 hour of news per day (Pew). The result of this is that they are simply not or are ill/mis-informed, and do not have hard preferences on policy or parties. About 15-20% of voters can correctly identify positions as belonging to the left or right (Kinder and Kalmoe, 17)
maxkagan.bsky.social
I don’t know the authors at all, but I do wonder if having an American (or US-based) author with more familiarity with the local context might have helped to raise this? Of course it’s probably far more common for the shoe to be on the other foot with US researchers unfamiliar with local context
maxkagan.bsky.social
Some of us have been saying this for years.
maxkagan.bsky.social
I could imagine one using the same draft design and looking at something like church attendance records over time (e.g., from the LDS member rolls) rather than the headstones only
maxkagan.bsky.social
Could be a good mechanism test, but then you're back to dealing with selection problem of enlistment... and it seems highly likely that people who voluntarily enlist would be more religious to begin with
maxkagan.bsky.social
From VA Form 40-1330, available here:

www.cem.va.gov/hmm/#:~:text...

The religious marker is optional but available at no additional charge.

One simple check: it seems like military headstones must include service details (i.e., branch, rank). Presumably one could exclude these.
maxkagan.bsky.social
I remember when this was posted on the other site, my concern was that veterans can get free tombstones (with a free religious icon), whereas non-veterans’ families would have to pay more to include a religious icon.
maxkagan.bsky.social
You can read the column for free?