MJ
@mjgrey.bsky.social
Multi trans girl, feminist, geek, Amazon-sized Californian, poly lesbian, aspiring writer, administrative ace. She/Her
Reposted by MJ
In addition, it also seems to include a series of definitions for gender-affirming care that could be restricted. All right here.
www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
December 8, 2025 at 11:58 PM
In addition, it also seems to include a series of definitions for gender-affirming care that could be restricted. All right here.
www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
Reposted by MJ
Also, the legislation would also prohibit Medicaid from being used to pay for "specified gender transition procedures." This is basically the same as the clause they tried to pass in the One Big, Beautiful Bill that failed. www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
December 9, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Also, the legislation would also prohibit Medicaid from being used to pay for "specified gender transition procedures." This is basically the same as the clause they tried to pass in the One Big, Beautiful Bill that failed. www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
Reposted by MJ
That’s the face of a woman who knows she made 0 mistakes.
December 5, 2025 at 10:09 PM
That’s the face of a woman who knows she made 0 mistakes.
Reposted by MJ
So much pain and suffering because a strong handful of exceedingly wealthy people don't understand the concept of "enough" and think that hoarding resources will fill the holes in their hearts.
Taxing billionaires alone would pay for all of it. THEY'LL BE FINE.
Taxing billionaires alone would pay for all of it. THEY'LL BE FINE.
December 4, 2025 at 3:57 PM
So much pain and suffering because a strong handful of exceedingly wealthy people don't understand the concept of "enough" and think that hoarding resources will fill the holes in their hearts.
Taxing billionaires alone would pay for all of it. THEY'LL BE FINE.
Taxing billionaires alone would pay for all of it. THEY'LL BE FINE.
Reposted by MJ
Because racism. Because sexism. Because ableism. Because greed. Because misanthropy. And so we keep using the word "deserve" to move some folks out of the circle of care.
It's SO MUCH CHEAPER and more effective if we just take care of our neighbors and include EVERYONE in the concept of neighbor.
It's SO MUCH CHEAPER and more effective if we just take care of our neighbors and include EVERYONE in the concept of neighbor.
December 4, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Because racism. Because sexism. Because ableism. Because greed. Because misanthropy. And so we keep using the word "deserve" to move some folks out of the circle of care.
It's SO MUCH CHEAPER and more effective if we just take care of our neighbors and include EVERYONE in the concept of neighbor.
It's SO MUCH CHEAPER and more effective if we just take care of our neighbors and include EVERYONE in the concept of neighbor.
Reposted by MJ
The kids are fine. The society we are gifting them is fucked.
December 1, 2025 at 8:26 PM
The kids are fine. The society we are gifting them is fucked.