Martin Z. Olszynski
@molszyns.bsky.social
8.1K followers 1.7K following 550 posts
Associate Professor & Chair in Energy, Resources & Sustainability @ U of Calgary Faculty of Law. Co-editor @ablawg.bsky.social. Thinking about land-use planning, trade-offs, and muddling through. Calgary, AB/Treaty 7 🇨🇦
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
molszyns.bsky.social
Friends who lunch together, keep #forevercanada together. I hope to have some proper signing opportunities up on the Forever Canada website soon but in the mean time: forever-canadian.ca/sign-the-pet...
Cool profs eating lunch and signing the Forever Canada petition.
molszyns.bsky.social
This is long form radio, which is probably self-defeating from the outset (to reach a broad audience), but if you want to understand why we’re way off course re: climate change, the human capacity for self-serving is on full display by some of the interviewees here.

www.cbc.ca/listen/live-...
© CBC/Radio-Canada 2025. All rights reserved.
www.cbc.ca
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
shastingssimon.bsky.social
This post brought to you by me being pleasantly surprised to discover I wrote an oped in the Globe and Mail with @molszyns.bsky.social I had completely forgotten about.
shastingssimon.bsky.social
My number one tip for researchers that do a significant amount of non peer reviewed paper publication/outreach:

Create an excel table, every time you give an interview, talk, write an oped or white paper, etc. take 5 seconds to immediately note it in the excel.
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
blakeshaffer.bsky.social
As a reminder, whether it be $95 or $110 per tonne, the “policy price” for industrial emissions is largely moot right now.

Emitters can pay for compliance using emissions offsets and performance credits, which are currently trading bilaterally for under $29 per tonne.
TIER emission performance credit settlement prices from NGX/ICE.
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
thebreakdownab.bsky.social
B.C. Premier David Eby is clearly beyond frustrated with Danielle Smith's pipeline dreams threatening the B.C. economy.

In a fiery statement, he called her out directly stating...

"This is not the Danielle Smith show!"

#abpoli #ableg #cdnpoli #bcpoli
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
hannahdaly.ie
The best guess of climate experts at this Overshoot Conference is that - in an optimistic scenario - we return to 1.5C (where we are now) in 7 generations time.

That's about the same distance from now as the start of the Industrial Revolution.
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
aryn.bsky.social
I’ve covered dozens of protests at the provinces’s southern office at the McDougall Centre, but today’s teacher rally was by far the largest by a measure. Truly massive turnout for teachers to express their anger at the government.
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
timothysnyder.bsky.social
One of the lessons I discuss in "On Tyranny":
Listen for dangerous words.
Text card: Listen for dangerous words.
Be alert to the use of the words extremism and terrorism. Be alive to the fatal notions of emergency and exception. Be angry about the treacherous use of patriotic vocabulary.
#OnTyranny
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
cwebbonline.com
Republicans got their marching orders and shutdown talking points, but when questioned, they fall apart.

Sen Roger Marshall wasn’t ready 🥴
molszyns.bsky.social
It literally rewards neglect: “If adopted, it is hard to see how any remaining O&G producer would ever take their closure obligations seriously...”

ICYMI, our analysis of #Ableg’s so-called Mature Asset Strategy (MAS).
molszyns.bsky.social
Better late than never: our 18 pp (!) analysis of #ableg's so-called Mature Asset Strategy (w/ Shaun Fluker and @drewyewchuk.bsky.social). TLDR: the MAS is a thinly disguised attempt to rewrite the origin story of Alberta's O&G closure liability crisis and to push more gov't support & deregulation.
ablawg.bsky.social
New Post: The Mature Asset Strategy for Alberta’s Oil and Gas Closure Liability Crisis: Where there is Smoke [and Mirrors], there is Fire.

ablawg.ca/2025/09/30...…rs-there-is-fire/
molszyns.bsky.social
Seems like a big deal. 🤷🏻‍♂️ #cdnpoli #ableg.

NB: $10.7 billion is undoubtedly an underestimate. Total oil sands mine closure estimates have swung wildly in the past 4 yrs (graph), which tells you something about their reliability.
An operating life deposit was collected for the first time. Syncrude posted $868,626,731 in security, bringing the total security for Syncrude Mildred Lake-Aurora North to $1,073,929,755. This means that the MFSP considers Syncrude's Mildred Lake-Aurora North mine to have 15 years of reserves remaining. If the MFSP operates as expected, Syncrude will post $1,073,929,755 in security annually for the next 9 years. It also indirectly suggests that Syncrude and the MFSP estimate the closure cost for the Syncrude Mildred Lake-Aurora North mine at just over $10.7 billion. The ease with which that can now be calculated is notable
and significant, as it means that the MFSP estimated liability for the Syncrude Mildred Lake-Aurora North mine is effectively now public information, while the estimated liabilities for the other mines are not. Both the AER and industry have been steadfast in their refusal to disclose these mine specific estimates or to subject them to third party scrutiny, as requested by some First Nations. Graph showing big swings in total oil sands mine liability.
molszyns.bsky.social
Not to mention that BC would have to consent to this pipeline — at least if it’s going to be a C-5 PONI (per s 5(1.1)):

bsky.app/profile/mols...
molszyns.bsky.social
I want to explain this a bit b/c it’s important. When the Building Canada Act (then C-5) was introduced, it required the feds to consult w/ the provinces re: PONIs (s 5(7)). But the Act was amended at 3rd reading by the Transportation Committee. Section 5(1.1) was added by the Bloc Québécois. 1/n
watershedlab.bsky.social
Reminder that Bill C-5 REQUIRES consent of the province or territory in which the project is to be built. I doubt BC will be onboard with this pipeline proposal.

H/t to @molszyns.bsky.social for this tidbit.

www.parl.ca/DocumentView...
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
maxfawcett.bsky.social
Precisely this.

Unless and until industry and Alberta put a real offer on the table -- full support for industrial carbon pricing and a decision to proceed with the Pathways project -- this conversation is over and the ball is in *their* court.
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
molszyns.bsky.social
We’re kicking off day 1 of our Closure Liabilities in the Energy Sector Conference. And in about 1&1/2 hrs, @drewyewchuk.bsky.social and I will be posting our latest @ablawg.bsky.social re: Alberta’s Mine Financial Security Program (MFSP). It’s sort of a big deal. #ableg #cdnpoli
Blog title: The 2025 Mine Financial Security
Program Update: Security Collected for Aging Syncrude Mine Offers a First Estimate of Mine Closure Costs
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
fatimabsyed.bsky.social
First Nations asked the Doug Ford gov't for oversight measures over special economic zones (law-free areas for trusted proponents & designated projects). They asked for a public registry, an appeals process on cabinet decisions and time limits.

The government said no
thenarwhal.ca/ontario-bill...
Ontario’s draft rules for special economic zones limit oversight | The Narwhal
The Doug Ford government’s draft regulations for special economic zones under Bill 5 empower ministers and dismiss First Nations’ request for oversight
thenarwhal.ca
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
maxfawcett.bsky.social
Good column.

Overdue, and filled with conclusions a lot of people arrived at many, many months ago, but hey, credit where it's due.

www.readtheline.ca/p/jen-gerson...
Jen Gerson: Maybe this angry panel will fix it!
Alberta tries for Round 3 of the Fair Deal panel.
www.readtheline.ca
Reposted by Martin Z. Olszynski
pembina.org
Without proper cleanup, aging oil and gas wells at the end of their producing lives continue to leak methane and toxic pollutants — and potential policy changes in AB risk shifting these cleanup costs onto taxpayers.

Learn more at tonight's town hall. 👇
REGISTER: Virtual Town Hall - Alberta Oil and Gas Well Cleanup Crisis
Join us October 2nd for a virtual town hall exposing the government's plan to make taxpayers pay for oil and gas cleanup. Free registration - secure your spot now.
buff.ly
molszyns.bsky.social
Like I said at the outset, 5(1.1) is curiously worded. But any doubt with respect to the above is erased when you read the French version, as lawyers and courts are instructed to do to discern a provision’s proper meaning.

End/la fin. 9/9
French text of 5(1.1): “Il doit obtenir son consentement écrit lorsque le projet touche des domaines de compétence provinciale ou territoriale exclusive.”
molszyns.bsky.social
Under constitutional rules, where a fed & prov law conflict, the fed law prevails under the doctrine of federal paramountcy. That’s why Burnaby couldn’t stop TMX: it couldn’t say “no” b/c the fed said “yes”.

But section 5(1.1) flips that. It requires provincial consent. 8/n
molszyns.bsky.social
So an interprovincial pipeline is primarily regulated by the Canada Energy Regulator Act. But it still has to comply w/ municipal bylaws in the towns it crosses. And it also has to comply w/ prov enviro-laws of general application. But here’s where the BQ’s amendment has its intended effect. 7/n