mtshastamothership
@mtshastamothership.bsky.social
No longer just chillin' under a volcano
#RESIST
His name is Butters...and yeah, he's as tough as he looks.
NO DMs
#RESIST
His name is Butters...and yeah, he's as tough as he looks.
NO DMs
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Amazing what someone will do to stop people talking about the Epstein files
January 3, 2026 at 10:32 AM
Amazing what someone will do to stop people talking about the Epstein files
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Reposted by mtshastamothership
It's an old and obvious pattern. An unpopular president - failing on the economy and losing his grip on power at home - decides to launch a war for regime change abroad.
The American people don’t want to “run” a foreign country while our leaders fail to improve life in this one.
The American people don’t want to “run” a foreign country while our leaders fail to improve life in this one.
January 3, 2026 at 5:08 PM
It's an old and obvious pattern. An unpopular president - failing on the economy and losing his grip on power at home - decides to launch a war for regime change abroad.
The American people don’t want to “run” a foreign country while our leaders fail to improve life in this one.
The American people don’t want to “run” a foreign country while our leaders fail to improve life in this one.
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Moulton: "When we had briefings on Venezuela, we asked, 'Are you going to invade the country?' We were told no. 'Do you plan to put troops on the ground?' We were told no. 'Do you intend regime change in VZ?' We were told no. So in a sense, we have been briefed, we've just been completely lied to"
January 3, 2026 at 6:01 PM
Moulton: "When we had briefings on Venezuela, we asked, 'Are you going to invade the country?' We were told no. 'Do you plan to put troops on the ground?' We were told no. 'Do you intend regime change in VZ?' We were told no. So in a sense, we have been briefed, we've just been completely lied to"
Reposted by mtshastamothership
It’s the United States that needs regime change.
January 3, 2026 at 6:27 PM
It’s the United States that needs regime change.
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Listen to the entire episode. Very important information. www.youtube.com/live/7JXQhff...
Today's News, January 3, 2025
YouTube video by Heather Cox Richardson
www.youtube.com
January 3, 2026 at 7:28 PM
Listen to the entire episode. Very important information. www.youtube.com/live/7JXQhff...
Listen to the entire episode. Very important information. www.youtube.com/live/7JXQhff...
Today's News, January 3, 2025
YouTube video by Heather Cox Richardson
www.youtube.com
January 3, 2026 at 7:28 PM
Listen to the entire episode. Very important information. www.youtube.com/live/7JXQhff...
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Anyone heard from her recently?
Wonder if the DNI has thoughts on a U.S. military intervention in Venezuela?
January 3, 2026 at 1:24 PM
Anyone heard from her recently?
Reposted by mtshastamothership
try to make sense of it
So fmr Honduran President Hernandez voluntarily surrendered, and was duly extradited, tried and convicted for drug trafficking, and Trump pardoned him 6w ago.
And this morning, Trump illegally attacks Venezuela and abducts its president and his wife purportedly to try them for drug trafficking.
And this morning, Trump illegally attacks Venezuela and abducts its president and his wife purportedly to try them for drug trafficking.
January 3, 2026 at 12:46 PM
try to make sense of it
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Im seeing discussions about consultations with congress, authorizations of force etc. I have to say this transcends any of what I would call sub constitutional technicalities. The president has gone to war with a foreign power and, it seems, kidnapped a foreign head of state on the basis of nothing.
January 3, 2026 at 9:43 AM
Im seeing discussions about consultations with congress, authorizations of force etc. I have to say this transcends any of what I would call sub constitutional technicalities. The president has gone to war with a foreign power and, it seems, kidnapped a foreign head of state on the basis of nothing.
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Besides, how stupid this is and how unethical this is.
Is there anyone in any party who wants resume change in South America? Like who is this for?
Is there anyone in any party who wants resume change in South America? Like who is this for?
January 3, 2026 at 2:06 PM
Besides, how stupid this is and how unethical this is.
Is there anyone in any party who wants resume change in South America? Like who is this for?
Is there anyone in any party who wants resume change in South America? Like who is this for?
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Bernie Sanders publicly swears in Zohran Mamdani as NYC mayor
January 1, 2026 at 7:44 PM
Bernie Sanders publicly swears in Zohran Mamdani as NYC mayor
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Mamdani: For too long, those fluent in the good grammar of civility have deployed decorum to mask agendas of cruelty
January 1, 2026 at 8:00 PM
Mamdani: For too long, those fluent in the good grammar of civility have deployed decorum to mask agendas of cruelty
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Can we quit calling it the "Justice" Dept. already??https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/31/epstein-files-trump-doj?CMP=share_btn_url
January 1, 2026 at 12:06 AM
Can we quit calling it the "Justice" Dept. already??https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/31/epstein-files-trump-doj?CMP=share_btn_url
Reposted by mtshastamothership
That is indeed what they did.
December 31, 2025 at 10:11 PM
That is indeed what they did.
Reposted by mtshastamothership
ICYMI: The deposition transcript of Former Special Counsel, Jack Smith, has been released by the House Judiciary Committee.
(I’ll share my thoughts and observations after I’ve had the chance to review it.)
judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-su...
(I’ll share my thoughts and observations after I’ve had the chance to review it.)
judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-su...
judiciary.house.gov
December 31, 2025 at 8:33 PM
ICYMI: The deposition transcript of Former Special Counsel, Jack Smith, has been released by the House Judiciary Committee.
(I’ll share my thoughts and observations after I’ve had the chance to review it.)
judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-su...
(I’ll share my thoughts and observations after I’ve had the chance to review it.)
judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-su...
Reposted by mtshastamothership
December 31, 2025 at 9:41 PM
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.
December 31, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Jack Smith: I believe we had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in both cases.
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Spread far and wide👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾
December 31, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Spread far and wide👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Smith: We had also interviewed Boris Epshteyn… He corroborated that they were, in fact, trying to call senators. He dissembled and tried to imply that the president hadn’t directed him to do it, even though there was a text message saying specifically that they had.
December 31, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Smith: We had also interviewed Boris Epshteyn… He corroborated that they were, in fact, trying to call senators. He dissembled and tried to imply that the president hadn’t directed him to do it, even though there was a text message saying specifically that they had.
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Half way through the Jack Smith transcript and it’s become abundantly clear why Jim Jordan didn’t want public testimony. Jordan spends a lot of time whining about the toll subpoenas, and Jack Smith shuts him down every time.
December 31, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Half way through the Jack Smith transcript and it’s become abundantly clear why Jim Jordan didn’t want public testimony. Jordan spends a lot of time whining about the toll subpoenas, and Jack Smith shuts him down every time.
Reposted by mtshastamothership
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
December 31, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.