Murixbob
murixbob.com
Murixbob
@murixbob.com
Reposted by Murixbob
I think what people who decide to oppose an available option b/c they decided ahead of time that it would fail actually want is to give themselves some sense they can control outcomes.

Knowing something will fail and not even trying is failed. But at least it is an outcome, and you controlled it.
January 7, 2026 at 12:08 PM
Reposted by Murixbob
You won't win fights you don't fight. And if there's someplace we all need to go, and you are elected as a leader, but you won't lead people there, then you're not a leader.

www.the-reframe.com/being-more-l...
You Won't Win Fights You Won't Fight
Four simple observations on the recent election about the nature of opposition.
www.the-reframe.com
January 7, 2026 at 12:04 PM
Reposted by Murixbob
You don't get impeachment without conviction and removal, and you demonstrate the moral bankruptcy of Republicans by putting them to as many votes proving it as possible.

The first step for any difficult but necessary thing is trying.

bsky.app/profile/lmh8...
Impeachment means nothing without conviction and removal. He's been impeached twice already and that did nothing because Republicans won't vote to convict and remove because they are morally bankrupt garbage humans just like TFG.
January 7, 2026 at 11:59 AM
Reposted by Murixbob
Not impeaching this president is an impeachable offense. Blocking articles of impeachment for this president is an impeachable offense. Not voting to remove this president is an impeachable offense. Ruling in favor of or voting for this president's policies is an impeachable offense.
January 7, 2026 at 10:12 AM
Reposted by Murixbob
Every member of Congress should draw up separate articles of impeachment for a different impeachable offense.

Once those articles are rejected, draw up new articles of impeachment for those involved in rejecting it, and articles of impeachment for a new impeachable offense, or the same one again.
January 7, 2026 at 10:11 AM
Reposted by Murixbob
X is producing deepfakes at a rate 84x higher than the top 5 dedicated deepfake sites combined, according to an analysis. Victims say there's no recourse. Their images are still up despite reports to X, and those who speak out become targets. www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
January 7, 2026 at 2:33 PM
Reposted by Murixbob
So yes, to put a bow on this series of posts, I am suggesting you are being lied to and you are believing those lies. You are exactly the kind of person I want to speak to in this video.

We have the opportunity to transition from an extractive energy paradigm to an energy harvest. We should do it.
January 7, 2026 at 2:53 PM
Reposted by Murixbob
And I strongly suspect that this concern is mostly expressed by those who are skeptical of renewable energy for whatever reason. One of the many reasons people are "skeptical" is because they have interests in other forms of energy and don't want worthless oil fields. And they make propaganda.
January 7, 2026 at 2:51 PM