omnomtom
@omnomtom.bsky.social
Ponies, friends, and way less booze than I used to on Berrytube. They/them
"No Trumpers" is also just a really quick shorthand to weed out people for the attributes he's claiming women don't value. People you absolutely don't want to build a life or a family with, who won't see you as an equal partner, and who aren't really bringing "stability" to the table either.
December 4, 2025 at 3:19 AM
"No Trumpers" is also just a really quick shorthand to weed out people for the attributes he's claiming women don't value. People you absolutely don't want to build a life or a family with, who won't see you as an equal partner, and who aren't really bringing "stability" to the table either.
Reposted by omnomtom
new york democrats shouldn't be let anywhere near power. the ideal democratic leader is a guy who won by 2 percent and actually thinks of the GOP, rather than other Democrats, as the enemy.
December 3, 2025 at 7:25 PM
new york democrats shouldn't be let anywhere near power. the ideal democratic leader is a guy who won by 2 percent and actually thinks of the GOP, rather than other Democrats, as the enemy.
I do agree, though I think that the extent that U.S. media migrated is far too little as well.
December 3, 2025 at 11:17 PM
I do agree, though I think that the extent that U.S. media migrated is far too little as well.
"This paper deserved 12% and not a 0" is probably not the argument all the turning point provocateurs want to be making though.
December 1, 2025 at 8:09 AM
"This paper deserved 12% and not a 0" is probably not the argument all the turning point provocateurs want to be making though.
Definitely 0/10 or at most 1/10 for the other two segments. She doesn't even prove she read the abstract of the assigned article, let alone read and engaged with the study. There's a good faith argument to be made that the paper deserved between 2 and 5 points out of 25 unless it failed wordcount.
December 1, 2025 at 8:07 AM
Definitely 0/10 or at most 1/10 for the other two segments. She doesn't even prove she read the abstract of the assigned article, let alone read and engaged with the study. There's a good faith argument to be made that the paper deserved between 2 and 5 points out of 25 unless it failed wordcount.
Does the paper show a clear tie in to the assigned article? (10 points)
Does the paper present a thoughtful reaction or response to the article? (10 points)
Is the paper clearly written? (5 points)
Yeah. I agree, 0/25 was not the correct grade. It deserved 2 or 3 out of 5 for clear writing.
Does the paper present a thoughtful reaction or response to the article? (10 points)
Is the paper clearly written? (5 points)
Yeah. I agree, 0/25 was not the correct grade. It deserved 2 or 3 out of 5 for clear writing.
December 1, 2025 at 8:07 AM
Does the paper show a clear tie in to the assigned article? (10 points)
Does the paper present a thoughtful reaction or response to the article? (10 points)
Is the paper clearly written? (5 points)
Yeah. I agree, 0/25 was not the correct grade. It deserved 2 or 3 out of 5 for clear writing.
Does the paper present a thoughtful reaction or response to the article? (10 points)
Is the paper clearly written? (5 points)
Yeah. I agree, 0/25 was not the correct grade. It deserved 2 or 3 out of 5 for clear writing.
"We'll start a war to bring down the government that's creating refugee flows" is NOT going to bring those refugee flows DOWN.
November 30, 2025 at 11:06 AM
"We'll start a war to bring down the government that's creating refugee flows" is NOT going to bring those refugee flows DOWN.
Well the fandom does also ship Link with the fishman Prince Sidon, so gender amphibious might be appropriate.
November 30, 2025 at 10:49 AM
Well the fandom does also ship Link with the fishman Prince Sidon, so gender amphibious might be appropriate.
If she'd read the paper and written something about "I think gender is immutable and enforcing it with peer pressure is good actually. The study interprets results as caused by bullying, but doesn't consider it could be a punishment from god for deviance." it probably would have got SOME marks.
November 30, 2025 at 10:42 AM
If she'd read the paper and written something about "I think gender is immutable and enforcing it with peer pressure is good actually. The study interprets results as caused by bullying, but doesn't consider it could be a punishment from god for deviance." it probably would have got SOME marks.
She didn't even DO the assignment, which was to prove that she read and thought critically about the reading. It looks like that reading is a paper about the effects of peer pressure on gender conformity and mental health... but the student doesn't engage with that topic at all!
November 30, 2025 at 10:42 AM
She didn't even DO the assignment, which was to prove that she read and thought critically about the reading. It looks like that reading is a paper about the effects of peer pressure on gender conformity and mental health... but the student doesn't engage with that topic at all!
Jesus, I saw that he'd used the r slur for Waltz, but honestly the gutter racism he spewed before and after that sentence is worse. It's shocking even after paying attention to his previous social media posts.
November 29, 2025 at 8:30 AM
Jesus, I saw that he'd used the r slur for Waltz, but honestly the gutter racism he spewed before and after that sentence is worse. It's shocking even after paying attention to his previous social media posts.
Reposted by omnomtom
screencapping this post to say I need to learn how the government works and that we should actually be talking about taking back the house is such aggressive weirdo shit
there is merit to filing articles of impeachment every time an impeachable thing happens even without a majority
there is merit to filing articles of impeachment every time an impeachable thing happens even without a majority
November 29, 2025 at 1:23 AM
screencapping this post to say I need to learn how the government works and that we should actually be talking about taking back the house is such aggressive weirdo shit
there is merit to filing articles of impeachment every time an impeachable thing happens even without a majority
there is merit to filing articles of impeachment every time an impeachable thing happens even without a majority
Also, draw up the articles of impeachment for Hegseth for ordering a war crime. Put the evidence before congress and the American people. So what if it doesn't have the votes.
Make every single Republican in congress have to make the choice between condemning Hegseth or publicly cosigning murder.
Make every single Republican in congress have to make the choice between condemning Hegseth or publicly cosigning murder.
November 29, 2025 at 3:06 AM
Also, draw up the articles of impeachment for Hegseth for ordering a war crime. Put the evidence before congress and the American people. So what if it doesn't have the votes.
Make every single Republican in congress have to make the choice between condemning Hegseth or publicly cosigning murder.
Make every single Republican in congress have to make the choice between condemning Hegseth or publicly cosigning murder.
Yes, AND... jailing individual executives who order illegal acts needs to be made the norm across the board, not just in this specific instance. For corporations proven to have committed price fixing, fraud, wilful violations of safety regulations, and union busting, fines are not enough deterrence.
November 28, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Yes, AND... jailing individual executives who order illegal acts needs to be made the norm across the board, not just in this specific instance. For corporations proven to have committed price fixing, fraud, wilful violations of safety regulations, and union busting, fines are not enough deterrence.
Don't forget his rhetoric about taking Greenland and repatriating the Panama Canal by force if necessary at the start of the year.
And him talking about putting boots on the ground in Nigeria to "protect Christians" LAST WEEK.
And him talking about putting boots on the ground in Nigeria to "protect Christians" LAST WEEK.
November 24, 2025 at 7:35 AM
Don't forget his rhetoric about taking Greenland and repatriating the Panama Canal by force if necessary at the start of the year.
And him talking about putting boots on the ground in Nigeria to "protect Christians" LAST WEEK.
And him talking about putting boots on the ground in Nigeria to "protect Christians" LAST WEEK.
I used to leave USD on my paypal because it was a lot more convenient than getting a us dollar account at my Canadian bank and it saved me taking currency change fees. I wouldn't keep my savings in there but there can be reasons to keep a small balance.
November 22, 2025 at 4:02 AM
I used to leave USD on my paypal because it was a lot more convenient than getting a us dollar account at my Canadian bank and it saved me taking currency change fees. I wouldn't keep my savings in there but there can be reasons to keep a small balance.
It's not even having been buddies with a pedophile that's led to consequences. It's having asked said pedophile for advice on how to coerce a junior colleague into sex.
It's not his association with Epstein that matters to harvard, it's public knowledge that he sexually sexually harassed coworkers.
It's not his association with Epstein that matters to harvard, it's public knowledge that he sexually sexually harassed coworkers.
November 21, 2025 at 12:54 AM
It's not even having been buddies with a pedophile that's led to consequences. It's having asked said pedophile for advice on how to coerce a junior colleague into sex.
It's not his association with Epstein that matters to harvard, it's public knowledge that he sexually sexually harassed coworkers.
It's not his association with Epstein that matters to harvard, it's public knowledge that he sexually sexually harassed coworkers.
Yeah. I mean Kamala's position was literally "My administration will follow the law and will not inflict cruel and unusual punishment on prisoners" and that was too pro-trans for some of these strategists. Infuriating
November 19, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Yeah. I mean Kamala's position was literally "My administration will follow the law and will not inflict cruel and unusual punishment on prisoners" and that was too pro-trans for some of these strategists. Infuriating
Turning the big "fascism" dial then looking at the audience for approval
November 19, 2025 at 1:04 AM
Turning the big "fascism" dial then looking at the audience for approval
Reposted by omnomtom
Call me old fashioned, but I remember when armed agents of the state barking, "where are your papers!?" was a thing that Americans associated with other, less free, less enlightened countries.
November 18, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Call me old fashioned, but I remember when armed agents of the state barking, "where are your papers!?" was a thing that Americans associated with other, less free, less enlightened countries.