If courts allow the Executive branch to arbitrarily claw back dollars that have been appropriated by Congress and already deposited in awardee bank accounts, why would **anybody** do business with the federal government in the future?
DC Circuit rules that the EPA does have the authority to claw back $16 billion in climate grants, overturning a lower court decision. news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-...
If you want to build a bunch of AI data centers, and also pull the rug out from under the wind, solar + battery industries that contributed **94%** of all new generation last year, you're gonna end up with an energy affordability crisis.
🚨 BREAKING: U.S. Court of Appeals just ruled in favor of EPA's efforts to claw back billions of GGRF dollars that were legally obligated and disbursed last year.
This is another hurdle in our fight to lower energy costs for the families and hardworking Americans who need it most.
As Matt Watkins writes in @commondreams.org, the delay isn't just about @climateunited.bsky.social or federal contracts or even appeals courts. It's about the EPA gaslighting us about the crisis we're facing, and Trump Administration executive overreach.
Americans face an affordability crisis, with energy costs skyrocketing, and storms and fires forcing millions of families across the country to choose between paying rent, energy, food or medicine.
Meanwhile, the Trump Admin delays funding for solutions.
But the Trump Admin apparently doesn't want Americans to benefit from lower energy bills, less pollution, and good-paying jobs. Instead, EPA drags this case on, freezing funds + terminating awards (illegal), accusing awardees of fraud (false), and putting red tape up for clean energy projects.
The funding that EPA froze was intended to lower energy costs, spur U.S. manufacturing, and create jobs across the country. Not just a little bit - A LOT MORE:
💰$52 billion in household energy savings 👷♀️41,000 more jobs annually 🤑$23 billion in wages earned 🌞Enough solar to power 2.2m homes annually
Yesterday, a U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled 2-1 to vacate a lower court's injunction barring EPA from clawing back billions in critical clean energy funding that @climateunited.bsky.social & others were awarded last yr. Here's how this decision could hurt hardworking Americans across the US 🧵
🚨 BREAKING: U.S. Court of Appeals just ruled in favor of EPA's efforts to claw back billions of GGRF dollars that were legally obligated and disbursed last year.
This is another hurdle in our fight to lower energy costs for the families and hardworking Americans who need it most.
There’s plenty of disinformation trying to blame the nascent offshore wind industry for whale deaths without evidence. Not only is that misleading, it also takes the focus away from solutions that might actually address the leading causes of death — vessel strikes and entanglement with fishing gear.
Why? Businesses know that renewables are the cheapest and fastest way to add new power capacity to meet increasing demand. Along with efficiency, grid upgrades, and new tech like virtual power plants, geothermal and nuclear, we can avoid the impending energy affordability crisis. LFG!
Despite attacks on the industry, clean energy is projected to account for **94%** of new electricity generation placed in service this year in the U.S. - a record!
"There’s a broad understanding that Appalachia is a disadvantaged region. Call it EJ, call it whatever you want. We deserve support now that the coal is gone. That’s an uncontroversial thing to say.” - Dana Kuhnline @reimagineappal8ia.bsky.social
The thing about climate change is that the overheated atmosphere doesn't care whether or not politicians believe climate solutions to be politically popular or not at any given moment. It will keep getting hotter until we do something about it. www.axios.com/2025/08/01/d...