Phil Hutchinson
@philhutchinson.bsky.social
Philosopher @ MMU #Psychology & on BPS Ethics Committee
Devised
Praxeological Analysis w/Doug Hardman
Crit. Praxeological Analysis w/Khadijah Diskin
✍🏻 #Shame #Stigma #Placebo #Wittgenstein #EMCA #Praxeology #Ethics #qual & soc sci methods
dry vegan🌱
Devised
Praxeological Analysis w/Doug Hardman
Crit. Praxeological Analysis w/Khadijah Diskin
✍🏻 #Shame #Stigma #Placebo #Wittgenstein #EMCA #Praxeology #Ethics #qual & soc sci methods
dry vegan🌱
Ha ha, only if I can be Phoebe
December 2, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Ha ha, only if I can be Phoebe
November 26, 2025 at 7:27 PM
This is a great thread, which encouraged me to go back to Conversation and Cognition this morning. I then proposed that we work through it, chapter by chapter, in the reading group I facilitate, & add Potter's follow-up paper from 2006, in which he responds to Drew.
So thanks!
So thanks!
November 26, 2025 at 7:19 PM
This is a great thread, which encouraged me to go back to Conversation and Cognition this morning. I then proposed that we work through it, chapter by chapter, in the reading group I facilitate, & add Potter's follow-up paper from 2006, in which he responds to Drew.
So thanks!
So thanks!
Not to defend 'the Manchester programme' & certainly not Button's book, but I don't think your criticism sticks. Anderson & Sharrock have argued that EM is 3rd Person Phenomenology. AFAIK, none of that old Manc crowd have ever argued that EM is a method, Rod Watson explicitly argued against the idea
November 19, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Not to defend 'the Manchester programme' & certainly not Button's book, but I don't think your criticism sticks. Anderson & Sharrock have argued that EM is 3rd Person Phenomenology. AFAIK, none of that old Manc crowd have ever argued that EM is a method, Rod Watson explicitly argued against the idea
Yes, that doesn't ring any bells for me, in that it's not a passage I'm immediately familiar with. Though the topic of the passage does sound like Koffka on behavioral environments (to be contrasted with geographic environments). So I'd be inclined to think it is Koffka and not Kohler.
November 4, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Yes, that doesn't ring any bells for me, in that it's not a passage I'm immediately familiar with. Though the topic of the passage does sound like Koffka on behavioral environments (to be contrasted with geographic environments). So I'd be inclined to think it is Koffka and not Kohler.
You probably know already, but for those reading this thread who don't, John Dupre has a paper titled "Are Whales Fish?" share.google/R3uTMQCCgI4o...
Which pairs well with his earlier paper "Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa"
Which pairs well with his earlier paper "Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa"
Are Whales Fish?
share.google
November 3, 2025 at 2:39 PM
You probably know already, but for those reading this thread who don't, John Dupre has a paper titled "Are Whales Fish?" share.google/R3uTMQCCgI4o...
Which pairs well with his earlier paper "Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa"
Which pairs well with his earlier paper "Natural Kinds and Biological Taxa"
Happy birthday!
November 1, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Happy birthday!
Because it's not about warning in the sense of encouraging people not to watch/read potentially distressing material it's about not being held responsible for someone's distress. If you've warned someone & they choose to watch/read then you're not liable for their distress.
October 13, 2025 at 6:36 AM
Because it's not about warning in the sense of encouraging people not to watch/read potentially distressing material it's about not being held responsible for someone's distress. If you've warned someone & they choose to watch/read then you're not liable for their distress.
Moustache is looking good!
October 1, 2025 at 7:43 AM
Moustache is looking good!
The Elephant Man.
I watched it again last year with my son Chinua (15 at the time). We sat there for ten minutes after in silence, before he hugged me (I had something in my eye) & then had a couple of hours of life affirming conversation. We still find ourselves taking about it now.
I watched it again last year with my son Chinua (15 at the time). We sat there for ten minutes after in silence, before he hugged me (I had something in my eye) & then had a couple of hours of life affirming conversation. We still find ourselves taking about it now.
September 22, 2025 at 11:07 AM
The Elephant Man.
I watched it again last year with my son Chinua (15 at the time). We sat there for ten minutes after in silence, before he hugged me (I had something in my eye) & then had a couple of hours of life affirming conversation. We still find ourselves taking about it now.
I watched it again last year with my son Chinua (15 at the time). We sat there for ten minutes after in silence, before he hugged me (I had something in my eye) & then had a couple of hours of life affirming conversation. We still find ourselves taking about it now.
I didn't see that. I actually thought that if anything SA got a rough deal from the ref in the second half. Though I wouldn't make a big deal of it. Great game but about the right result. Can't wait for the next one.
September 6, 2025 at 9:48 AM
I didn't see that. I actually thought that if anything SA got a rough deal from the ref in the second half. Though I wouldn't make a big deal of it. Great game but about the right result. Can't wait for the next one.