Phil Jeffcock
@pjeffcock.bsky.social
“Well, maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls, and maybe the two dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally.”
(Flipping heck I’d erased short tweets from my memory. What old hell is this character clock?)
(Flipping heck I’d erased short tweets from my memory. What old hell is this character clock?)
November 18, 2025 at 3:08 PM
“Well, maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls, and maybe the two dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally.”
(Flipping heck I’d erased short tweets from my memory. What old hell is this character clock?)
(Flipping heck I’d erased short tweets from my memory. What old hell is this character clock?)
Oh well, it’s only “Black Friday Week” and the entire interweb now relies on it. What could possibly go wrong. I think it’s deliberate to enforce Trump’s two dolls policy.
November 18, 2025 at 3:07 PM
Oh well, it’s only “Black Friday Week” and the entire interweb now relies on it. What could possibly go wrong. I think it’s deliberate to enforce Trump’s two dolls policy.
Seems flaky still.
November 18, 2025 at 1:25 PM
Seems flaky still.
I thought it might be. Was getting it more directly reported elsewhere.
November 18, 2025 at 12:53 PM
I thought it might be. Was getting it more directly reported elsewhere.
Reposted by Phil Jeffcock
Thank you for really listening to caller @annemarie1.bsky.social & as you succinctly said: "The short termism of prioritising the economy has led to the economy suffering because there have been so many people infected (w Covid) & are now unable to work".
@zackpolanski.bsky.social
#BoldPolitics
@zackpolanski.bsky.social
#BoldPolitics
October 5, 2025 at 2:06 PM
Thank you for really listening to caller @annemarie1.bsky.social & as you succinctly said: "The short termism of prioritising the economy has led to the economy suffering because there have been so many people infected (w Covid) & are now unable to work".
@zackpolanski.bsky.social
#BoldPolitics
@zackpolanski.bsky.social
#BoldPolitics
Reposted by Phil Jeffcock
You tell me Clade 2 is doing that 👆🏼…
May 24, 2025 at 12:47 PM
You tell me Clade 2 is doing that 👆🏼…
Reposted by Phil Jeffcock
Would you put out a correction tomorrow James?
You said there are 69,000 #LongCovidKids which is wrong. Please see the chart below.
The number of children suffering DOUBLED Mar '23-Mar'24. Despite this alarming rise in the number of sick chn the govt. are not bothering to collect any more data 🤯
You said there are 69,000 #LongCovidKids which is wrong. Please see the chart below.
The number of children suffering DOUBLED Mar '23-Mar'24. Despite this alarming rise in the number of sick chn the govt. are not bothering to collect any more data 🤯
February 24, 2025 at 1:32 PM
Would you put out a correction tomorrow James?
You said there are 69,000 #LongCovidKids which is wrong. Please see the chart below.
The number of children suffering DOUBLED Mar '23-Mar'24. Despite this alarming rise in the number of sick chn the govt. are not bothering to collect any more data 🤯
You said there are 69,000 #LongCovidKids which is wrong. Please see the chart below.
The number of children suffering DOUBLED Mar '23-Mar'24. Despite this alarming rise in the number of sick chn the govt. are not bothering to collect any more data 🤯
See what I mean about corroborating it!
I suspect the latter is correct.
I didn’t like the Python it generated behind the scenes for the first answer.
I suspect the latter is correct.
I didn’t like the Python it generated behind the scenes for the first answer.
February 10, 2025 at 12:05 AM
See what I mean about corroborating it!
I suspect the latter is correct.
I didn’t like the Python it generated behind the scenes for the first answer.
I suspect the latter is correct.
I didn’t like the Python it generated behind the scenes for the first answer.
It now says:
The probability of being present for exactly 12 out of 13 deaths while working only 20% of shifts is approximately 0.0000000426 (or 4.26 in 100 million). This is an extremely unlikely event
The probability of being present for exactly 12 out of 13 deaths while working only 20% of shifts is approximately 0.0000000426 (or 4.26 in 100 million). This is an extremely unlikely event
February 10, 2025 at 12:01 AM
It now says:
The probability of being present for exactly 12 out of 13 deaths while working only 20% of shifts is approximately 0.0000000426 (or 4.26 in 100 million). This is an extremely unlikely event
The probability of being present for exactly 12 out of 13 deaths while working only 20% of shifts is approximately 0.0000000426 (or 4.26 in 100 million). This is an extremely unlikely event
Hmm. When you ask it
“Statistically, what are the chances of being present for 12 out of 13 deaths if you only worked 20% of shifts. This is a genuine question. I don't know the answer.”
“Statistically, what are the chances of being present for 12 out of 13 deaths if you only worked 20% of shifts. This is a genuine question. I don't know the answer.”
February 10, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Hmm. When you ask it
“Statistically, what are the chances of being present for 12 out of 13 deaths if you only worked 20% of shifts. This is a genuine question. I don't know the answer.”
“Statistically, what are the chances of being present for 12 out of 13 deaths if you only worked 20% of shifts. This is a genuine question. I don't know the answer.”
“The probability of being present for 12 or more out of 13 deaths, while only working 20% of shifts, is approximately 0.00000434% (or about 1 in 23 million).
This is an extraordinarily rare event. “
This is an extraordinarily rare event. “
February 9, 2025 at 11:52 PM
“The probability of being present for 12 or more out of 13 deaths, while only working 20% of shifts, is approximately 0.00000434% (or about 1 in 23 million).
This is an extraordinarily rare event. “
This is an extraordinarily rare event. “
I asked it to write some scripts during the week to configure some fairly technical ethernet networking and it made up a bunch of commands but worse still the entire approach it took was complete nonsense. Had to figure it out myself 😭
February 8, 2025 at 1:46 AM
I asked it to write some scripts during the week to configure some fairly technical ethernet networking and it made up a bunch of commands but worse still the entire approach it took was complete nonsense. Had to figure it out myself 😭
It is an amazing tool but still at the point where you need to corroborate its work (which I did via an online binomial calculator).
February 8, 2025 at 1:44 AM
It is an amazing tool but still at the point where you need to corroborate its work (which I did via an online binomial calculator).
1 in a million according to ChatGPT
February 8, 2025 at 12:49 AM
1 in a million according to ChatGPT