Patrick Campbell
@pwilldotorg.bsky.social
I used to believe a lot of irrational things, but I’ve been trying to cut down.
Reposted by Patrick Campbell
say what you like about Saruman but at least he was a YIMBY
January 26, 2026 at 10:27 PM
say what you like about Saruman but at least he was a YIMBY
You mean in his pants?
January 26, 2026 at 7:22 PM
You mean in his pants?
Looks more like she’s sprinting (even if that’s inadvisable on ice!)
January 23, 2026 at 1:54 PM
Looks more like she’s sprinting (even if that’s inadvisable on ice!)
Looks like this is a trailing indicator. Doesn’t that imply we’ve already entered a recession?
January 9, 2026 at 1:02 PM
Looks like this is a trailing indicator. Doesn’t that imply we’ve already entered a recession?
Small town version: Pump the gas, then ask them to put it on your tab.
January 9, 2026 at 12:31 PM
Small town version: Pump the gas, then ask them to put it on your tab.
I’m always struck that no one ever mentions that carrying a child to term is unpleasant at best, permanently altering, and potentially fatal.
Even if giving a child up for adoption were the answer to financial costs, it doesn’t change the risk profile of pregnancy one bit.
Even if giving a child up for adoption were the answer to financial costs, it doesn’t change the risk profile of pregnancy one bit.
December 22, 2025 at 12:34 PM
I’m always struck that no one ever mentions that carrying a child to term is unpleasant at best, permanently altering, and potentially fatal.
Even if giving a child up for adoption were the answer to financial costs, it doesn’t change the risk profile of pregnancy one bit.
Even if giving a child up for adoption were the answer to financial costs, it doesn’t change the risk profile of pregnancy one bit.
I misread that at first.
“How does she go through that many chopsticks? Aren’t they reusable?,”
“How does she go through that many chopsticks? Aren’t they reusable?,”
December 14, 2025 at 11:59 AM
I misread that at first.
“How does she go through that many chopsticks? Aren’t they reusable?,”
“How does she go through that many chopsticks? Aren’t they reusable?,”
Reposted by Patrick Campbell
Remember, insurance carriers pay nothing if the beneficiary can't afford their deductible and avoids care
December 10, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Remember, insurance carriers pay nothing if the beneficiary can't afford their deductible and avoids care
Reposted by Patrick Campbell
The mechanics are very simple: the growth mandate of these companies, vs the profit structure of gambling as a trade for as far as we've known it (it comes mostly from problem users) means your customer acquisition is by definition trying to create problematic use bsky.app/profile/rory...
Dodgy blokes in the backs of pub who'd break your legs provided better pastoral support of problem gamblers than betting companies
December 6, 2025 at 10:05 AM
The mechanics are very simple: the growth mandate of these companies, vs the profit structure of gambling as a trade for as far as we've known it (it comes mostly from problem users) means your customer acquisition is by definition trying to create problematic use bsky.app/profile/rory...