Enrique Fernández Macías
@quiquefm.bsky.social
240 followers 420 following 46 posts
https://enriquefernandezmacias.wordpress.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
karlosj89.bsky.social
Teacher bias or unobserved ability? @ssreditorial.bsky.social paper w/ @marespadafor.bsky.social Test score error & omitted behavior = 🐘 in the (class)room to identify SES discrimination. Still, beyond "true ability", well-off (low-performing) kids get higher teacher ratings: doi.org/10.1016/j.ss...
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
sergiotorrejon.com
my first solo single as palmera noir is out today! Listen 🎧 and share if you enjoy it open.spotify.com/album/7jYTUo...

🌴🖤 #music #newrelease
Estrellas y Limones
open.spotify.com
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
quiquefm.bsky.social
Digital tools are changing how we work (either in front of computers or using mobile/wearable digital devices), how work is organised (labour platforms and new forms of outsourcing) and controlled (digital monitoring, algorithmic management). The challenge is job quality, not mass unemployment.
quiquefm.bsky.social
We argue that robots are not destroying jobs in a significant way, computers are not polarising labour markets, and AI tends to complement rather than substitute labour. In our view, the main impact of digital technologies has been on the nature and organisation of work, not on employment numbers.
A summary table with the main findings of the report "Work in the Digital Era: How Technology is Transforming Work and Occupations"
quiquefm.bsky.social
In the research summarised in this report, we try to confront dominant narratives with carefully compiled evidence. In the last few years there has been a kind of "automation anxiety" which in our view is completely unsupported by data.
Table of contents of the report "Work in the Digital Era: How Technology is Transforming Work and Occupations"
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
sergiotorrejon.com
Just published: a Joint Research Centre ( @ec.europa.eu ) report on ‘Work in the Digital Era: How Technology is Transforming Work and Occupations | publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/h... @quiquefm.bsky.social @lauranurski.bsky.social
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
keithfitzgerald.bsky.social
Worth a watch:

Head of Signal, Meredith Whittaker, on so-called "agentic AI" and the difference between how it's described in the marketing and what access and control it would actually require to work as advertised.
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
sandertordoir.bsky.social
I wrote a new piece for foreign policy.

The US's postwar role as guarantor of Europe’s security is over – and may even turn adversarial. But Europe has an overlooked trump card.

When it comes to manufacturing Europe blows the US out of the water.

Thread.

1/

foreignpolicy.com/2025/03/07/e...
Heavy Industry Is Europe’s Trump Card
The continent has an upper hand in its looming security competition with the United States.
foreignpolicy.com
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
sergiotorrejon.com
📢 Book Alert! "Global Trends in Job Polarisation and Upgrading: A Comparison of Developed and Developing Economies" is out!

Published by Palgrave Macmillan/ Springer, this volume examines global patterns of job creation at a global scale | 🔗 link.springer.com/book/10.1007... #EconSky #sociology
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
stefanschubert.bsky.social
Inheritance flows are rising as a share of national output in many rich countries (The Economist)
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
aloisi.bsky.social
🔋 The terms “twin” and “#justtransition” have, up to now, been a discursive device rather than a framework guiding policy. However, the interplay between the transitions is more than a matter of terminology – it is what dictates regulatory actions & practical implementations: bit.ly/eutwintransit
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
vkreilinger.bsky.social
🗳️ Germany: Left, centre, and right at the federal elections since 1949, updated with the official 2025 preliminary results
Reposted by Enrique Fernández Macías
quiquefm.bsky.social
New paper out on "Green Jobs. A critique of the occupational approach to measure the employment implications of the green transition." In it, we critically examine the predominant occupational method for assessing green employment, revealing significant limitations. 1/7 #sociology #econsky
Green Jobs. A critique of the occupational approach to measure the employment implications of the green transition
The green transition is set to transform labour markets, yet its impact remains difficult to measure. This paper critically examines the occupational approach—based on task-based measures—which is the...
publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu
quiquefm.bsky.social
Bonus: in our "Labour, Education and Technology" (LET) working paper series, we are publishing other interesting studies on the employment impact of the green transition, check it out!
JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology, Joint Research Centre | IDEAS/RePEc
ideas.repec.org
quiquefm.bsky.social
In short, we argue that the occupational approach cannot adequately capture the evolving labor market dynamics of the green transition. Alternative methodologies, based on measuring green outputs and processes at the company level, are needed. 7/7 END
quiquefm.bsky.social
Empirical application across 24 EU countries (2011-2022) suggests (misleadingly) very little change in the share of green jobs in the last 15 years. Furthermore, no correlation is found with key environmental indicators. 6/7
Chart that shows the evolution in the share of employment in green jobs according to the occupational approach
quiquefm.bsky.social
Also, the occupational approach is vulnerable to "greenwashing". Companies may create "green-sounding" positions with little real impact, skewing results & undermining effective policy monitoring. If an indicator is prone to manipulation, it loses effectiveness. 5/7
quiquefm.bsky.social
Methodological challenges include inconsistent categorizations, arbitrary task definitions, outdated classifications, and flawed assumptions regarding temporal and cross-national consistency in occupational content. 4/7