Robert Tienken
banner
rtienken.bsky.social
Robert Tienken
@rtienken.bsky.social
Reader, Cat Lover, Mall Walker
Reposted by Robert Tienken
She also gives kisses.
October 25, 2025 at 3:39 AM
Reposted by Robert Tienken
What a sweet Golden face!! Penelope says hi
August 1, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Hi Ms Lundoff I have been trying to reach you about a book order, but don't know how to DM.
March 11, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Reposted by Robert Tienken
Everyone knows this is true; it's not a secret in any way. But it's in violation of a number of regulations, and a LOT of times the company will just give up and pay the bill rather than handing you proof they're violating the regs. It's a tactic that has worked for me many, many times.
March 26, 2024 at 2:22 AM
Reposted by Robert Tienken
This is, she says, a wildly successful tactic, because if the insurance company answers them honestly, it gives you evidence that the "doctors" making these determinations are practicing medicine out of scope, without proper licensing and qualifications, in areas they are not competent in.
March 26, 2024 at 2:20 AM
Reposted by Robert Tienken
4) the aggregate rate at which similar treatments are denied vs approved by the specific doctor being used for peer review.

You are not entitled by law to *all* of these things in most states, but you're entitled to some of them, and you can always ask for them.
March 26, 2024 at 2:19 AM
Reposted by Robert Tienken
2) copies of all materials they relied on to make their determination;
3) proof the doctor making the determination has maintained registration in your specific state and documentation of their meeting all their continuing education requirements;
March 26, 2024 at 2:18 AM
Reposted by Robert Tienken
To everyone in a similar scenario: the tactic my doctor's office has taught me is to ask, in writing, for:
1) the name, board specialty, and license number of the doctor making the determination the treatment was not medically necessary;
March 26, 2024 at 2:16 AM