Amir Safavi-Naeini
@safavi.bsky.social
500 followers 320 following 180 posts
Building cool quantum, photonic, and nanomechanical stuff as Prof at Stanford. https://quantum-noise.ghost.io
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Amir Safavi-Naeini
michaelsbrett.bsky.social
Watch Oskar Painter's presentation from Quantum Korea in Seoul. As Director of Quantum Hardware at AWS Center for Quantum Computing, he discusses the 'quantum tyranny of numbers' & forecasts major quantum error correction advances
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ojnf...

#QuantumComputing #AWS
퀀텀 코리아 2025 키노트① Oskar Painter
YouTube video by 퀀텀코리아(Quantumkorea)
www.youtube.com
safavi.bsky.social
A major milestone in my career, as one of the self-appointed knights of quantum.
bullshitquantum.bsky.social
Not bullshit
safavi.bsky.social
A quantum computer is a physical machine that can execute quantum algorithms with at most polynomial resource scaling.
safavi.bsky.social
Since I don’t think it’s possible to be this obtuse, I’m assuming this is just marketing for your widget.

I’m sorry I wasted my time thinking you actually wanted a definition for a quantum computer.

I’m also sorry you need to waste people’s time to sell the thing but c’est la vie.
safavi.bsky.social
A quantum computer is a physical machine that can execute quantum algorithms with at most polynomial resource scaling.
safavi.bsky.social
It’s not a “legal term” where I live, and my statement was clearly a conditional, so not an accusation.

Let’s stick to subjects we both understand: Are your students walking away with the clear understanding that a classical simulator with exponential scaling is not a quantum computer?
safavi.bsky.social
Chris, you're doing educational malpractice if your students are walking away without a clear understanding of the difference between a classical simulation and an actual quantum computer. Ignoring the entire premise of quantum computing just to sell widgets isn't a noble antiestablishment position.
safavi.bsky.social
Yes this is the right definition because the whole point of trying to build a quantum computer is their ability to do certain computations much more efficiently. It’s been central since 1982.
safavi.bsky.social
But the most important thing IMO is centering it on scalability like Craig did.

what's wrong with this definition: A quantum computer is a physical machine that can execute quantum algorithms with at most polynomial resource scaling.
safavi.bsky.social
Your critique of DV didn't make much sense to me:
2- it's architecture agnostic, we can at least simulate qubits, initialization, gates, etc. in any arch.
3- who cares?
4- They're criteria, not an object description. Just like "the criteria for a valid airplane" doesn't refer to a single 747.
safavi.bsky.social
Personally I would go with a simpler definition: A quantum computer is a physical machine that can execute quantum algorithms with at most polynomial resource scaling.

DV criteria are necessary. Craig was just pointing out where your system clearly fails.
Reposted by Amir Safavi-Naeini
safavi.bsky.social
Craig did give a definition (scalability being key), and it seems much more informative and operationally useful than your definition.

Are you having trouble understanding this definition? Maybe you can point out what is unclear about it and the community can help you.
Reposted by Amir Safavi-Naeini
safavi.bsky.social
Anti-Nazi fighter? English is a weird language.
safavi.bsky.social
Michael Roukes kicking off #FNS2025, going back 30 years to the beginning of NEMs. (explaining this paper arxiv.org/abs/2505.04574 which was then rejected by APL!)
Michael Roukes presenting slide describing a converation between him, Andrew Cleland, and Tom Kenny.
Reposted by Amir Safavi-Naeini
preskill.bsky.social
The building committee gets a first look at the basement of the Ginsburg Center for Quantum Precision Measurement at Caltech. We're standing where a tunnel will connect Ginsburg labs to labs in neighboring Downs Laboratory. With me are Nick Hutzler, Rana Adhikari, Michelle Effros, and Dave Hsieh.
Reposted by Amir Safavi-Naeini
manuflurin.bsky.social
New paper out! We resonantly couple a superconducting heavy-fluxonium qubit ⚛️ to a macroscopic membrane 🥁 oscillating at a few MHz. ~300 repeated interactions let us track its quantum motion, observe back-action & probe non-commuting operators. Diósi–Penrose next? (1/8)
arxiv.org/abs/2505.21481
Probing the quantum motion of a macroscopic mechanical oscillator with a radio-frequency superconducting qubit
Long-lived mechanical resonators like drums oscillating at MHz frequencies and operating in the quantum regime offer a powerful platform for quantum technologies and tests of fundamental physics. Yet,...
arxiv.org
Reposted by Amir Safavi-Naeini
emollick.bsky.social
Big: The final version of a randomized, controlled World Bank study finds using a GPT-4 tutor with teacher guidance in a six week afterschool program in Nigeria had "more than twice the effect of some of the most effective interventions in education" ("equating to 1.5 to 2 years" of standard school)