Sam Leeming
@samleem.bsky.social
Former Non Dualist. Believed in subjective nature of reality.🙏📿 Overturned by Science and Doubt.
How do we best know what we know? Standards of evidence.🏵️
How do we best know what we know? Standards of evidence.🏵️
Reposted by Sam Leeming
There it is - nothing suspicious about that going offline at exactly the same time it became clear that a novel pneumonia similar to SARS was being linked to the very same market selling those animals...
January 20, 2026 at 9:24 PM
There it is - nothing suspicious about that going offline at exactly the same time it became clear that a novel pneumonia similar to SARS was being linked to the very same market selling those animals...
Reposted by Sam Leeming
In military operations, it's typical to see cognitive hybrid war precede kinetic (i.e., violent) operations.
In kinetic operations, often the first objective is to destroy command and control (i.e., information) infrastructure.
This might help illustrate my prior point.
In kinetic operations, often the first objective is to destroy command and control (i.e., information) infrastructure.
This might help illustrate my prior point.
January 19, 2026 at 7:37 AM
In military operations, it's typical to see cognitive hybrid war precede kinetic (i.e., violent) operations.
In kinetic operations, often the first objective is to destroy command and control (i.e., information) infrastructure.
This might help illustrate my prior point.
In kinetic operations, often the first objective is to destroy command and control (i.e., information) infrastructure.
This might help illustrate my prior point.
Maybe go back to X to try and sell your wears there?
January 12, 2026 at 10:48 PM
Maybe go back to X to try and sell your wears there?
Reposted by Sam Leeming
Published in Feb 2020 as a Commentary, a brief article refuted claims that SARS-CoV-2 had been engineered from RaTG13, SHC014 or MA15, or HIV.
Nothing controversial here! And the article's impact was limited. But it was targeted by FOIA requests. ▫️2/6
Nothing controversial here! And the article's impact was limited. But it was targeted by FOIA requests. ▫️2/6
January 6, 2026 at 6:20 PM
Published in Feb 2020 as a Commentary, a brief article refuted claims that SARS-CoV-2 had been engineered from RaTG13, SHC014 or MA15, or HIV.
Nothing controversial here! And the article's impact was limited. But it was targeted by FOIA requests. ▫️2/6
Nothing controversial here! And the article's impact was limited. But it was targeted by FOIA requests. ▫️2/6