There was me thinking they were incentivised by public service...

Big round floofy thing happy to be fussed.

Luna plans to sleep until it is Friday

Is there an argument that the vulnerability of the threatened group and likelihood of attack is relevant? This wouldn't differentiate between the two cases you highlight, but if, say, a tweet wished violence upon people with brown hair, could this be accepted as very unlikely to result in violence?

With great sorrow, I must announce that I put the wrong bin put last night. And had a lie in.

And more basic unmet needs
www.theguardian.com/global-devel...

And yet, the basic material needs, so crucial for recovery, are not close to being met:
bsky.app/profile/alja...

No, guidance is not enforceable because it’s not rules. Legislation often imposes an obligation on defined people or bodies to “have regard to” guidance & the expectation is that it will usually be followed; but where there is good reason to depart this may be judged lawful if challenged.

My "favourite" bit is when Kuenssberg uses the Peggie ruling as a reason for trans people to be excluded from single-sex spaces. When the judgment says the complete opposite.

Does it have to be done today? I don't mean to sound trite, but self care may be better today if you're able.

Does this mean that it will be enforceable if Parliament approve it? On any other issue, business would be lobbying against due to the financial costs involved.

The bbc article says that, once published, the EHRC guidance will have legal force. What does this mean?

This is horrifying. What can ordinary people outside the various systems involved do to stop this kind of thing happening?

Not going to like that for obvious reasons, but thank you for sharing. I had naively assumed that if someone was being deported to their national country that they would just be allowed in.

Why does this happen? The deporting back to the UK? Did Singapore not accept he was Singaporean? And what happens to people when they're deported back here having already had their case rejected?