Matty G
@sfmattyg.bsky.social
Silly-ist, leftist, autistic AF, super gay 🏳️🌈, San Franciscan/N̶e̶b̶r̶a̶s̶k̶a̶n̶
Storyteller / Lover of world-building
(He/They)
Storyteller / Lover of world-building
(He/They)
Pinned
Matty G
@sfmattyg.bsky.social
· Nov 21
The "cure" for autism is to make the world as accommodating to autistic kids and adults as it is to neurotypical kids and adults.
Reposted by Matty G
Reposted by Matty G
Feel like I’m going insane with the revisionist history that Charlie Kirk fostered open debate. He chilled speech and his targeting of professors for wrongthink led to threats, harassment, and being forced out of their jobs. His legacy is chilling speech right now, about him
September 13, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Feel like I’m going insane with the revisionist history that Charlie Kirk fostered open debate. He chilled speech and his targeting of professors for wrongthink led to threats, harassment, and being forced out of their jobs. His legacy is chilling speech right now, about him
Reposted by Matty G
If you have a screenshot of a US politician or leader blaming the left, or declaring some war, or anything before we knew who the shooter was, please post in the comments. We will need to keep these
September 12, 2025 at 6:33 PM
If you have a screenshot of a US politician or leader blaming the left, or declaring some war, or anything before we knew who the shooter was, please post in the comments. We will need to keep these
We had a difference of opinion. He thought I should be put to death by stoning, whereas I didn't want to be killed. Now I'm seeing this being called "a healthy debate."
Unlike him, I don't think he deserved to be killed. But he also doesn't deserve to be eulogized in any manner of positive light.
Unlike him, I don't think he deserved to be killed. But he also doesn't deserve to be eulogized in any manner of positive light.
September 12, 2025 at 5:22 AM
We had a difference of opinion. He thought I should be put to death by stoning, whereas I didn't want to be killed. Now I'm seeing this being called "a healthy debate."
Unlike him, I don't think he deserved to be killed. But he also doesn't deserve to be eulogized in any manner of positive light.
Unlike him, I don't think he deserved to be killed. But he also doesn't deserve to be eulogized in any manner of positive light.
Reposted by Matty G
Interesting how they have left out how several recent reviews have recommended trans care for youth in European countries.
Doesn’t fit their narrative I guess.
www.erininthemorning.com/p/new-german...
Doesn’t fit their narrative I guess.
www.erininthemorning.com/p/new-german...
New German, Swiss, And Austrian Guidelines Recommend Trans Youth Care, Slam Cass Review
The recommendations, released by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany, come at a time when US politicians erroneously claim that Europe is "pulling back" on transgender care.
www.erininthemorning.com
June 19, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Interesting how they have left out how several recent reviews have recommended trans care for youth in European countries.
Doesn’t fit their narrative I guess.
www.erininthemorning.com/p/new-german...
Doesn’t fit their narrative I guess.
www.erininthemorning.com/p/new-german...
CBS legal correspondent Jan Crawford is an ignorant transphobe who thought she hid her bias when speaking about today's Supreme Court ruling upholding TN's ban on life saving medical care for trans youth, but her bias was evident.
June 19, 2025 at 1:54 AM
CBS legal correspondent Jan Crawford is an ignorant transphobe who thought she hid her bias when speaking about today's Supreme Court ruling upholding TN's ban on life saving medical care for trans youth, but her bias was evident.
SF mayor says "we will never tolerate violent and destructive behavior."
Hear that ICE? Violence will not be tolerated!
(You were taking about ICE, right Mayor Lurie? Not the people defending themselves and their families from ICE... RIGHT?)
Hear that ICE? Violence will not be tolerated!
(You were taking about ICE, right Mayor Lurie? Not the people defending themselves and their families from ICE... RIGHT?)
An important message from @sfgov.sf.gov Mayor Daniel Lurie: “As Mayor, my top priority has always been the safety of everyone in our city. Today, we stand with our immigrant community, Local law enforcement is here to protect all San Franciscans."
#SafeSF #StrongerTogether
#SafeSF #StrongerTogether
June 10, 2025 at 2:18 AM
SF mayor says "we will never tolerate violent and destructive behavior."
Hear that ICE? Violence will not be tolerated!
(You were taking about ICE, right Mayor Lurie? Not the people defending themselves and their families from ICE... RIGHT?)
Hear that ICE? Violence will not be tolerated!
(You were taking about ICE, right Mayor Lurie? Not the people defending themselves and their families from ICE... RIGHT?)
The media really doesn't know how - or is just unwilling - to accurately frame a story where it's law enforcement breaking the laws, where it's protesters defending & protecting families, where it's the *govt* & its instruments (ICE) inciting violence & dismantling our institutions in the process.
June 9, 2025 at 7:03 PM
The media really doesn't know how - or is just unwilling - to accurately frame a story where it's law enforcement breaking the laws, where it's protesters defending & protecting families, where it's the *govt* & its instruments (ICE) inciting violence & dismantling our institutions in the process.
Before Trump (illegally) calls on the California National Guard to act against Californians, maybe Gov. Newsom should preempt him by mobilizing the National Guard to protect the people of LA from Trump's Gestapo (ICE).
June 8, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Before Trump (illegally) calls on the California National Guard to act against Californians, maybe Gov. Newsom should preempt him by mobilizing the National Guard to protect the people of LA from Trump's Gestapo (ICE).
Reposted by Matty G
Here is the situation if I’m understanding it correctly:
1. They are deporting lawful immigrants erroneously to prisons overseas
2. They are claiming no recourse to return these individuals
3. They say they are open to deporting citizens in the same way
1. They are deporting lawful immigrants erroneously to prisons overseas
2. They are claiming no recourse to return these individuals
3. They say they are open to deporting citizens in the same way
April 14, 2025 at 4:45 PM
Here is the situation if I’m understanding it correctly:
1. They are deporting lawful immigrants erroneously to prisons overseas
2. They are claiming no recourse to return these individuals
3. They say they are open to deporting citizens in the same way
1. They are deporting lawful immigrants erroneously to prisons overseas
2. They are claiming no recourse to return these individuals
3. They say they are open to deporting citizens in the same way
Reposted by Matty G
this administration had no problems fishing andrew tate out of a romanian prison
Either the U.S. government *is* able to exert monetary and diplomatic pressure on El Salvador sufficient to produce Abrego Garcia’s release, or it isn’t.
The latter would be either a bald-faced lie or a pretty stunning concession of our national impotence. The Vice President should pick one.
The latter would be either a bald-faced lie or a pretty stunning concession of our national impotence. The Vice President should pick one.
April 15, 2025 at 12:43 PM
this administration had no problems fishing andrew tate out of a romanian prison
Reposted by Matty G
How judges can hold Trump admin accountable for defying court orders https://www.axios.com/2025/04/15/trump-defy-court-orders-contempt-constitutional-crisis
#axios #news #usnews
#axios #news #usnews
April 16, 2025 at 2:57 AM
How judges can hold Trump admin accountable for defying court orders https://www.axios.com/2025/04/15/trump-defy-court-orders-contempt-constitutional-crisis
#axios #news #usnews
#axios #news #usnews
Reposted by Matty G
Federal marshals forced entry into the US African Development Foundation and escorted Musk staffers inside, after agency employees resisted their entry. Once inside, they changed the federal agency’s locks. Musk staffers were seen plugging in an external hard drive and going through everything.
March 6, 2025 at 11:37 PM
Federal marshals forced entry into the US African Development Foundation and escorted Musk staffers inside, after agency employees resisted their entry. Once inside, they changed the federal agency’s locks. Musk staffers were seen plugging in an external hard drive and going through everything.
Reposted by Matty G
Elon Musk is locking government employees out of government systems and demanding access to the government's entire payment network. This is not legal, of course.
www.reuters.com/world/us/mus...
www.reuters.com/world/us/mus...
Exclusive: Musk aides lock government workers out of computer systems at US agency, sources say
Aides to Elon Musk charged with running the U.S. government human resources agency have locked career civil servants out of computer systems that contain the personal data of millions of federal employees, according to two agency officials.
www.reuters.com
January 31, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Elon Musk is locking government employees out of government systems and demanding access to the government's entire payment network. This is not legal, of course.
www.reuters.com/world/us/mus...
www.reuters.com/world/us/mus...
Reposted by Matty G
i think an important thing for people outside the US to understand is that elon musk seized control of the government today and most americans don’t even realize it happened.
February 1, 2025 at 5:43 AM
i think an important thing for people outside the US to understand is that elon musk seized control of the government today and most americans don’t even realize it happened.
Reposted by Matty G
Sorry for stating the obvious. But what I cannot wrap my head around is the way that, for elite politicos, rules and norms are either totally rigid, with any breach constituting a massive scandal, or completely optional, with only nerds caring if they’re followed, depending on if Trump is in charge
The federal government has intense limits on data sharing in order to protect privacy. Sharing IRS tax data to another part of government *requires an act of Congress.*
What constraints are being placed on Musk hoovering up people's personal data?
What constraints are being placed on Musk hoovering up people's personal data?
February 1, 2025 at 10:54 PM
Sorry for stating the obvious. But what I cannot wrap my head around is the way that, for elite politicos, rules and norms are either totally rigid, with any breach constituting a massive scandal, or completely optional, with only nerds caring if they’re followed, depending on if Trump is in charge