Maya Sen
@mayasen.bsky.social
20K followers 400 following 1.2K posts

Professor, Harvard Kennedy School | Speaking in a personal capacity | https://msen.scholars.harvard.edu/

Economics 33%
Law 32%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

mayasen.bsky.social
Consistent with billionaires’ involvement in politics as well - because they have money, they think they know better than anyone else
murshedz.bsky.social
“More than three dozen federal judges have told The New York Times that the Supreme Court’s flurry of brief, opaque emergency orders in cases related to the Trump administration have left them confused about how to proceed in those matters and are hurting the judiciary’s image with the public.”
Federal Judges, Warning of ‘Judicial Crisis,’ Fault Supreme Court’s Emergency Orders
www.nytimes.com

mayasen.bsky.social
I think all this means is people who are are underpaid relative to their private sector market value

mayasen.bsky.social
You can take issue with the subject matter, sure

But you should take issue with the fact that it’s a terribly written, uninsightful book

mayasen.bsky.social
Re: Jake Tapper, his Biden book was objectively one of the worst books I have read in years - bullet points strung together loosely by generic sentences. Repetitive.

No profound insights or interesting analysis. Like they had AI generate a book from their reporters’ notes.

mayasen.bsky.social
wild, & good for him

mayasen.bsky.social
I’d probably look for a different doctor

mayasen.bsky.social
I think in general policymakers understand the value high end academics bring to society

But they will tolerate spending for it only if there is political and economic stability - they will not incur political costs for it

mayasen.bsky.social
Oh yes. There’s that dimension, that will be bad as well. Without prestige, academics are sorely underpaid

I’m thinking about it from the perspective of policymakers and limited resources (both political and economic)

mayasen.bsky.social
Nah they’re all in the *other* littauer

mayasen.bsky.social
I think this is why I worry for the future of academia

We are all, in the end, easily jettisoned luxury goods

mayasen.bsky.social
Yeah my response to my spouse: “well, she’s French or something. And also why does MIT even have an economics department?”

mayasen.bsky.social
I’ve been asking myself just how much society views high-end academics as a luxury good - they cost a lot and the pay offs are vague and mostly prestige based (no offense to these two), and make sense politically mostly at times of high economic and political stability

mayasen.bsky.social
Congratulations to Zurich but I must say that reactions to this have been fascinating

Eveything from “Trump did this” to “economics is a dying field”
econ.uzh.ch
We are thrilled to welcome Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee as the new Lemann Foundation Professors to our department, beginning in the summer of 2026.
econ.uzh.ch
We are thrilled to welcome Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee as the new Lemann Foundation Professors to our department, beginning in the summer of 2026.

mayasen.bsky.social
Genuinely a terrible book

mayasen.bsky.social
Reforming higher ed via one-on-one business “deals” (🙄) is a bad way to do higher ed policy

nothing about this represents reasoned policy making, nothing incorporates concerns of stakeholders, and any agreement would be the result of unconstitutional coercion and retaliation

mayasen.bsky.social
Not feeling good about a random private equity billionaire with no academic experience apparently negotiating on behalf of university affiliates!

mayasen.bsky.social
SCOTUS “eliminating Section 2, a provision that prohibits racial gerrymandering when it dilutes minority voting power, would let Republicans redraw up to 19 House seats to favor the party and crush minority representation in Congress”

www.politico.com/news/2025/10...
Republicans could draw 19 more House seats after an upcoming Supreme Court ruling
Many experts are forecasting the end of a key provision of election law — enabling Republicans to shore up their advantage in the House, according to a new report.
www.politico.com
daveweigel.bsky.social
The View segment where Whoopi asked how ordinary people could read SCOTUS opinions was revealing.

They're free. They're online. They're much easier to read than legislation. Conquer your imposter's syndrome, you are smart enough to read a decision and know if it's bullshit.
tomscocca.bsky.social
It's not just that they're going to strike down a law against conversion therapy, it's that they're going to do it on behalf of made-up claims from a straw plaintiff who can't honestly show the law affected her at all
tomscocca.bsky.social
One thing about American's widespread distrust and disapproval of the Supreme Court is that mainstream news coverage mostly doesn't dwell on stuff like standing, so people don't even begin to grasp how rigged the Court truly is www.nytimes.com/live/2025/10...

Reposted by Maya Sen

mayasen.bsky.social
She’s doing a lot of work throughout the piece to give the administration the benefit of the doubt

Ignores similar ideological attacks on law firms, private businessss, and political adversaries that together paint a very different picture l

mayasen.bsky.social
Universities should at some point step in to articulate a positive vision of higher ed & scientific research to our fellow countrymen

But that cannot be done under coercion

mayasen.bsky.social
She says this version should be rejected as executive overreach in favor of negotiations with Congress along similar lines

Which assumes universities will be taken seriously as negotiators by a benevolent Congress on a basis free from coercion

Not sure how you realistically get there from here?

mayasen.bsky.social
It’s immediately pragmatic and so good for someone in university leadership?

mayasen.bsky.social
Has the old post-World War II compact between universities and the government collapsed? Yes

Do we need a new one? Yes

Is this that moment? I don’t think so

Neither the executive nor Congress have a coherent theory for promoting scientific research or higher ed reforms beyond ideological ones

Reposted by David Darmofal

mayasen.bsky.social
Agree with @profmarylewis.bsky.social - very puzzling piece that assumes a good faith operations by the executive and eventually by Congress, and also assumes that higher education and research are seen as societally good by these relevant players

Also ignores the issue of govt coercion
profmarylewis.bsky.social
Danielle Allen has proposed many good things for Harvard, so I’m puzzled by her reading of the word “compact” here, as if this would be an agreement freely entered into. She rightly says that, as written, this shouldn’t be agreed to. Maybe leave it there? therenovator.substack.com/p/why-im-exc...
Why I’m Excited About the White House’s Proposal for a Higher Ed Compact
Now we have a chance for collective action
therenovator.substack.com