sharynhall.bsky.social
@sharynhall.bsky.social
If this is the standard I may have to unfollow!
February 14, 2025 at 7:02 AM
If this is the standard I may have to unfollow!
Reposted by sharynhall.bsky.social
Now you are just being silly the government is responsible for our National Sovereignty if anyone betrayed us it was Scott Morrison. Dutton would sell us in a heart beat
Albo can wade these treacherous waters without giving away the farm. Relax wait a while
Albo can wade these treacherous waters without giving away the farm. Relax wait a while
February 7, 2025 at 6:00 AM
Now you are just being silly the government is responsible for our National Sovereignty if anyone betrayed us it was Scott Morrison. Dutton would sell us in a heart beat
Albo can wade these treacherous waters without giving away the farm. Relax wait a while
Albo can wade these treacherous waters without giving away the farm. Relax wait a while
Reposted by sharynhall.bsky.social
This is silly, Albo knows he was handed a shit sandwich. He wrapped it up tight and hasn't taken a bite. Later this year he will be able to bin it safely
February 7, 2025 at 5:38 AM
This is silly, Albo knows he was handed a shit sandwich. He wrapped it up tight and hasn't taken a bite. Later this year he will be able to bin it safely
Reposted by sharynhall.bsky.social
Morrison built the shit sandwich and wrapped it with foreign affairs cling wrap. Hard to unwrap. But the money spent so far is very small, just enough to stop it being unwrapped. I have been against it from the start but now I see more strategically. I trust Anthony
February 7, 2025 at 5:50 AM
Morrison built the shit sandwich and wrapped it with foreign affairs cling wrap. Hard to unwrap. But the money spent so far is very small, just enough to stop it being unwrapped. I have been against it from the start but now I see more strategically. I trust Anthony
No, purrfectly acceptable 🙏🏼
January 30, 2025 at 9:08 PM
No, purrfectly acceptable 🙏🏼
Reposted by sharynhall.bsky.social
That's the poker game. The defendants offer so much money (+ covering all legal fees) that the plaintiff runs a high risk of 'winning' a lower sum of money and becoming responsible for *all* legal fees. That would not be a 'win'. Hugh Grant covered it well when his case was settled last year:
Why has Hugh Grant settled his phone hacking claim against the Sun?
The actor said he wanted to fight on – but the size of an offer from News Group made it financially risky to continue
www.theguardian.com
January 22, 2025 at 1:58 PM
That's the poker game. The defendants offer so much money (+ covering all legal fees) that the plaintiff runs a high risk of 'winning' a lower sum of money and becoming responsible for *all* legal fees. That would not be a 'win'. Hugh Grant covered it well when his case was settled last year: