Once that part, the part they give the least fucks about, has been sprayed with slop, there will *inevitably* be a new part they now give the least fucks about.

And then they spray the dogshit onto fruit just a little bit higher, until the whole damn tree is drenched.

Ha, I wonder how ol' Labour is gonna triangulate itself into punching left *this* time

Ah, well nevertheless

What "affliction?"

Or, alternatively: Tell me your Rubicon. How bad does genAI need to get before you stop believing that it's the future? What line could it cross that would make you swear off it, morally or technically?

It's really telling that you think that a counselor is the person who tells you to stop being mean online

That's not what a counselor does for most people, but it seems like it's something you immediately jump to

Some folks never learned that the teacher doesn't actually live at the school

Sorry, I clicked those by accident

All rules about writing are, unironically, subject to the zeroth rule: "if it made me personally smile, it's good"

RFK jr sexts like he's only ever seen the kind of porn you have to get a 3d renderer for because people don't do that irl

so like, who knows

I had that happen with the TWoAPW the other day, the audio dropped out precisely with the line about what Sonic says and picked up precisely with you saying "that's exactly how I'd write it" and I thought it was a silent protagonist bit

Why not just ask for user consent first? Why this forced approach? Surely if the features were good, people would turn them on manually- is someone's pay packet tied to a usage metric? Is that metric being boosted by this nonconsent approach?