Jacey is a suitable combo of my actual name for privacy reasons
@spacegrace.bsky.social
she/her
Great that people who don’t understand the basics about the hoops trans folk have to jump through in the UK get to write pieces for our national papers.
Not the worst piece (nor the best) but simple to check stuff like claiming we need a GRC to get a new passport gets published without correction.
Not the worst piece (nor the best) but simple to check stuff like claiming we need a GRC to get a new passport gets published without correction.
December 12, 2025 at 10:56 AM
Great that people who don’t understand the basics about the hoops trans folk have to jump through in the UK get to write pieces for our national papers.
Not the worst piece (nor the best) but simple to check stuff like claiming we need a GRC to get a new passport gets published without correction.
Not the worst piece (nor the best) but simple to check stuff like claiming we need a GRC to get a new passport gets published without correction.
Fucking state of this. Acting like they are completely powerless to do anything since the SC judgement.
Any new way of including people without amending the Equality Act will just be all-new segregation, now with added ‘dignity and respect’.
Any new way of including people without amending the Equality Act will just be all-new segregation, now with added ‘dignity and respect’.
December 10, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Fucking state of this. Acting like they are completely powerless to do anything since the SC judgement.
Any new way of including people without amending the Equality Act will just be all-new segregation, now with added ‘dignity and respect’.
Any new way of including people without amending the Equality Act will just be all-new segregation, now with added ‘dignity and respect’.
I put in a complaint yesterday, this was their response.
![Thank you for contacting Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries regarding Channel 4 News.
The short news item you refer to explicitly stated that Ms.
Peggie had won "a harassment claim against NHS Fife".
There was no suggestion within the report that Dr. Upton had been found liable for anything. We also made clear that Ms. Peggie's other claims were dismissed. We are therefore happy that the wording of this brief summary report was fair and accurate.
Please be assured that your comments have been noted and logged for the attention of those responsible for the programme.
Thank you again for taking the time to contact us. We appreciate all feedback from our viewers; complimentary or otherwise.
Regards,
[name redacted]
Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:cxpfpjjada5owr6iqs7mwmxj/bafkreigdwova4ha33hn6cvljfevrdi7vo7x7xsqfdg6weljfx7f5wjylhm@jpeg)
December 9, 2025 at 9:09 PM
I put in a complaint yesterday, this was their response.
Are they capable of presenting the facts in a clear, contextual and concise manner? Her partial victory was so minor compared to everything she lost on. Maybe try a headline about how it is lawful for trans people to access the spaces aligned with their gender? Transphobes gonna transphobe, I guess.
December 8, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Are they capable of presenting the facts in a clear, contextual and concise manner? Her partial victory was so minor compared to everything she lost on. Maybe try a headline about how it is lawful for trans people to access the spaces aligned with their gender? Transphobes gonna transphobe, I guess.
Are you capable of presenting the facts in a clear, contextual and concise manner? Her partial victory was so minor compared to everything she lost on. Maybe try a headline about how it is lawful for trans people to access the spaces aligned with their gender. Transphobes gonna transphobe, I guess.
![3. The decision
The Tribunal found that the Board had harassed Mrs Peggie by:
(a) failing to revoke the grant of permission to Dr Upton on an interim basis after Mrs Peggie complained, for the period until different work rotas took effect so that they would not work together, as a result of which Dr Upton was in the changing room when the claimant was present on two occasions;
(b) taking an unreasonable length of time to investigate the allegations against her;
(c) making reference to patient care allegations against her on 28 March 2024; and
(d) giving an instruction to her not to discuss the case, until a further message a little over two weeks later which confirmed that that applied only to the investigation.
The Tribunal otherwise dismissed all of the allegations against the Board. It dismissed the claim against Dr Upton.
In reaching its decision the Tribunal considered the effect of the Supreme Court decision in the case of For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] ICR 899.
It concluded that that decision did not result in it being inherently unlawful for a trans female, who is biologically male under the Act, to be given permission to use a female changing room at work, but also that having the protected characteristic of gender reassignment did not mean that permission to use the changing room was necessarily](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:cxpfpjjada5owr6iqs7mwmxj/bafkreigfahsmxqijgxajh5a7pb4jjhael6xjfpecfcwyoyhrt375lfkg3y@jpeg)
December 8, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Are you capable of presenting the facts in a clear, contextual and concise manner? Her partial victory was so minor compared to everything she lost on. Maybe try a headline about how it is lawful for trans people to access the spaces aligned with their gender. Transphobes gonna transphobe, I guess.
Just say it about trans people next time Joey. Easy to avoid consequences that way, just ask a certain Irish former comedy writer.
December 8, 2025 at 12:06 PM
Just say it about trans people next time Joey. Easy to avoid consequences that way, just ask a certain Irish former comedy writer.
Also cowardly to restrict comments and quote reposts on this.
December 3, 2025 at 1:52 PM
Also cowardly to restrict comments and quote reposts on this.
Nothing beats separate but equal, hey? @womensinstitute.bsky.social
Read through your statement, what pressure are you putting on government to rectify this whole issue by amended the EA2010 to be inclusive of trans people? I’m guessing none whatsoever, even though it would cost you nothing.
Read through your statement, what pressure are you putting on government to rectify this whole issue by amended the EA2010 to be inclusive of trans people? I’m guessing none whatsoever, even though it would cost you nothing.
December 3, 2025 at 1:51 PM
Nothing beats separate but equal, hey? @womensinstitute.bsky.social
Read through your statement, what pressure are you putting on government to rectify this whole issue by amended the EA2010 to be inclusive of trans people? I’m guessing none whatsoever, even though it would cost you nothing.
Read through your statement, what pressure are you putting on government to rectify this whole issue by amended the EA2010 to be inclusive of trans people? I’m guessing none whatsoever, even though it would cost you nothing.
Getting transphobia out of Your Party appears to be like playing whack-a-mole at this point.
Fitting as the whole thing seems to be about as serious as a fun fair.
Fitting as the whole thing seems to be about as serious as a fun fair.
November 15, 2025 at 8:36 PM
Getting transphobia out of Your Party appears to be like playing whack-a-mole at this point.
Fitting as the whole thing seems to be about as serious as a fun fair.
Fitting as the whole thing seems to be about as serious as a fun fair.
Two things from this exchange between Phillipson and her Shadow equivalent from today.
1) Worrying that Coutinho doesn’t know what month the SC ruling was. The transphobia is, of course, unsurprising.
2) We are still fucked looking at Phillipson’s comments. No RIA but a quicker minimum assessment.
1) Worrying that Coutinho doesn’t know what month the SC ruling was. The transphobia is, of course, unsurprising.
2) We are still fucked looking at Phillipson’s comments. No RIA but a quicker minimum assessment.
November 5, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Two things from this exchange between Phillipson and her Shadow equivalent from today.
1) Worrying that Coutinho doesn’t know what month the SC ruling was. The transphobia is, of course, unsurprising.
2) We are still fucked looking at Phillipson’s comments. No RIA but a quicker minimum assessment.
1) Worrying that Coutinho doesn’t know what month the SC ruling was. The transphobia is, of course, unsurprising.
2) We are still fucked looking at Phillipson’s comments. No RIA but a quicker minimum assessment.
Weird that despite how powerful the supposed trans lobby is that even our ‘good news’ is tinged with Phillipson advocating for our segregation because we are a threat.
The level of contradiction here between insisting on ‘single-sex’ spaces and not discriminating against trans folk is amazing.
The level of contradiction here between insisting on ‘single-sex’ spaces and not discriminating against trans folk is amazing.
November 4, 2025 at 8:25 AM
Weird that despite how powerful the supposed trans lobby is that even our ‘good news’ is tinged with Phillipson advocating for our segregation because we are a threat.
The level of contradiction here between insisting on ‘single-sex’ spaces and not discriminating against trans folk is amazing.
The level of contradiction here between insisting on ‘single-sex’ spaces and not discriminating against trans folk is amazing.
Seems @mariecgoldman.bsky.social has deleted this ‘ill conceived’ post from last week.
Kept a slightly longer (and MAYBE marginally less shit) version on her Facebook though. Wonder why? Maybe because she’s another Tory in yellow who can’t take criticism and she is getting less of it over there…
Kept a slightly longer (and MAYBE marginally less shit) version on her Facebook though. Wonder why? Maybe because she’s another Tory in yellow who can’t take criticism and she is getting less of it over there…
November 3, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Seems @mariecgoldman.bsky.social has deleted this ‘ill conceived’ post from last week.
Kept a slightly longer (and MAYBE marginally less shit) version on her Facebook though. Wonder why? Maybe because she’s another Tory in yellow who can’t take criticism and she is getting less of it over there…
Kept a slightly longer (and MAYBE marginally less shit) version on her Facebook though. Wonder why? Maybe because she’s another Tory in yellow who can’t take criticism and she is getting less of it over there…
November 2, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Best B&M impulse purchase I’ve ever made.
November 1, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Best B&M impulse purchase I’ve ever made.
I’m not one to be like “all change is bad” but this is a bad change. White W on a blue tile = Microsoft Word. Whatever this is = 🤷🏻♀️
October 13, 2025 at 1:10 PM
I’m not one to be like “all change is bad” but this is a bad change. White W on a blue tile = Microsoft Word. Whatever this is = 🤷🏻♀️
Unsolicited tactic pic.
October 11, 2025 at 12:37 PM
Unsolicited tactic pic.
Mood
October 4, 2025 at 1:32 PM
Mood
This is what you get when a supposedly progressive government tries to placate the Right.
They aren’t satisfied, they just demand more and more until the policy/actions of the government and the darkest, previously hidden, wishes of the most hateful become indistinguishable.
archive.ph/tYW8P
They aren’t satisfied, they just demand more and more until the policy/actions of the government and the darkest, previously hidden, wishes of the most hateful become indistinguishable.
archive.ph/tYW8P
September 30, 2025 at 3:32 PM
This is what you get when a supposedly progressive government tries to placate the Right.
They aren’t satisfied, they just demand more and more until the policy/actions of the government and the darkest, previously hidden, wishes of the most hateful become indistinguishable.
archive.ph/tYW8P
They aren’t satisfied, they just demand more and more until the policy/actions of the government and the darkest, previously hidden, wishes of the most hateful become indistinguishable.
archive.ph/tYW8P
Red means good for things like this right, Wes? That’s what you mean by better place, not much much worse than ten years ago.
September 25, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Red means good for things like this right, Wes? That’s what you mean by better place, not much much worse than ten years ago.
Don’t believe your eyes just trust that we have good vibes despite, you know, everything that has happened over the last year and a bit to the trans community.
September 21, 2025 at 11:12 AM
Don’t believe your eyes just trust that we have good vibes despite, you know, everything that has happened over the last year and a bit to the trans community.
September 18, 2025 at 2:40 PM
“Inclusive, diverse Britain”… but not trans people, fuck those trans people until they all lock themselves in their homes, move abroad or die.
Alison McGovern trying to call for inclusivity & diversity when she has been fucking silent on trans lives being turned upside down over the last 5 months..
Alison McGovern trying to call for inclusivity & diversity when she has been fucking silent on trans lives being turned upside down over the last 5 months..
September 10, 2025 at 2:19 PM
“Inclusive, diverse Britain”… but not trans people, fuck those trans people until they all lock themselves in their homes, move abroad or die.
Alison McGovern trying to call for inclusivity & diversity when she has been fucking silent on trans lives being turned upside down over the last 5 months..
Alison McGovern trying to call for inclusivity & diversity when she has been fucking silent on trans lives being turned upside down over the last 5 months..
I don’t think it will move the government or the EHRC but the TUC Congress just unanimously passed a trans positive motion. There were speakers from various unions who were trans/non-binary and even those who weren’t were passionate in our support.
September 9, 2025 at 4:49 PM
I don’t think it will move the government or the EHRC but the TUC Congress just unanimously passed a trans positive motion. There were speakers from various unions who were trans/non-binary and even those who weren’t were passionate in our support.
My letter to my MP now the EHRC Code of Practice has been submitted for ministerial approval. I did write to him previously about the EHRC using AI hence my reference to another letter. Did you use some of the template (link below) but I’m not good at brevity so ended up with an 1,800 word combo.
September 7, 2025 at 2:10 PM
My letter to my MP now the EHRC Code of Practice has been submitted for ministerial approval. I did write to him previously about the EHRC using AI hence my reference to another letter. Did you use some of the template (link below) but I’m not good at brevity so ended up with an 1,800 word combo.
Step 1 - Someone aligned with Your Party is shown to be a transphobe
Step 2 - Put out some pretty words about supporting trans rights with no concrete measures or actions about how this will be done on a party level
Step 3 - Repeat Steps 1 and 2
Step 4 - ????
Step 5 - Prepare for government!
Step 2 - Put out some pretty words about supporting trans rights with no concrete measures or actions about how this will be done on a party level
Step 3 - Repeat Steps 1 and 2
Step 4 - ????
Step 5 - Prepare for government!
![Twitter/X post by Zarah Sultana MP saying:
Trans rights are human rights.
Your Party will defend them — no ifs, no buts.
And I won't let anyone, whoever they are, get in the way of this fight.
Solidarity always [image of trans flag]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:cxpfpjjada5owr6iqs7mwmxj/bafkreialazb2nqmmlrez4gs5vvhua4kjprit3547h75sjs2nxpkhpbrltu@jpeg)
September 4, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Step 1 - Someone aligned with Your Party is shown to be a transphobe
Step 2 - Put out some pretty words about supporting trans rights with no concrete measures or actions about how this will be done on a party level
Step 3 - Repeat Steps 1 and 2
Step 4 - ????
Step 5 - Prepare for government!
Step 2 - Put out some pretty words about supporting trans rights with no concrete measures or actions about how this will be done on a party level
Step 3 - Repeat Steps 1 and 2
Step 4 - ????
Step 5 - Prepare for government!