Jacey is a suitable combo of my actual name for privacy reasons
@spacegrace.bsky.social
she/her
I put in a complaint yesterday, this was their response.
![Thank you for contacting Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries regarding Channel 4 News.
The short news item you refer to explicitly stated that Ms.
Peggie had won "a harassment claim against NHS Fife".
There was no suggestion within the report that Dr. Upton had been found liable for anything. We also made clear that Ms. Peggie's other claims were dismissed. We are therefore happy that the wording of this brief summary report was fair and accurate.
Please be assured that your comments have been noted and logged for the attention of those responsible for the programme.
Thank you again for taking the time to contact us. We appreciate all feedback from our viewers; complimentary or otherwise.
Regards,
[name redacted]
Channel 4 Viewer Enquiries](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:cxpfpjjada5owr6iqs7mwmxj/bafkreigdwova4ha33hn6cvljfevrdi7vo7x7xsqfdg6weljfx7f5wjylhm@jpeg)
December 9, 2025 at 9:09 PM
I put in a complaint yesterday, this was their response.
Are you capable of presenting the facts in a clear, contextual and concise manner? Her partial victory was so minor compared to everything she lost on. Maybe try a headline about how it is lawful for trans people to access the spaces aligned with their gender. Transphobes gonna transphobe, I guess.
![3. The decision
The Tribunal found that the Board had harassed Mrs Peggie by:
(a) failing to revoke the grant of permission to Dr Upton on an interim basis after Mrs Peggie complained, for the period until different work rotas took effect so that they would not work together, as a result of which Dr Upton was in the changing room when the claimant was present on two occasions;
(b) taking an unreasonable length of time to investigate the allegations against her;
(c) making reference to patient care allegations against her on 28 March 2024; and
(d) giving an instruction to her not to discuss the case, until a further message a little over two weeks later which confirmed that that applied only to the investigation.
The Tribunal otherwise dismissed all of the allegations against the Board. It dismissed the claim against Dr Upton.
In reaching its decision the Tribunal considered the effect of the Supreme Court decision in the case of For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers [2025] ICR 899.
It concluded that that decision did not result in it being inherently unlawful for a trans female, who is biologically male under the Act, to be given permission to use a female changing room at work, but also that having the protected characteristic of gender reassignment did not mean that permission to use the changing room was necessarily](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:cxpfpjjada5owr6iqs7mwmxj/bafkreigfahsmxqijgxajh5a7pb4jjhael6xjfpecfcwyoyhrt375lfkg3y@jpeg)
December 8, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Are you capable of presenting the facts in a clear, contextual and concise manner? Her partial victory was so minor compared to everything she lost on. Maybe try a headline about how it is lawful for trans people to access the spaces aligned with their gender. Transphobes gonna transphobe, I guess.