Charlotte
@spriteacus.bsky.social
Chronic lurker, people at work message and ask me for ‘a hammer and sickle chat’ when they want to check something or get info on our policy. I’m in a union, byline times subscriber for years, my social media is very angry politics and some hobbies.
I felt this one on my soul and fingers!
December 18, 2025 at 1:04 PM
I felt this one on my soul and fingers!
This perfectly sums up BBC policy!
December 16, 2025 at 6:05 PM
This perfectly sums up BBC policy!
Thank you for responding, they having taken down a lot of trees and pretty much all the hedges including thriving lilac trees. Loads of audio dampening and wildlife habitat is destroyed now.
December 5, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Thank you for responding, they having taken down a lot of trees and pretty much all the hedges including thriving lilac trees. Loads of audio dampening and wildlife habitat is destroyed now.
I would appreciate hearing why, Gary isn’t perfect but I’d put him in good optics / in line with Green objectives. I’m very open to understanding your viewpoint on this.
December 3, 2025 at 8:40 AM
I would appreciate hearing why, Gary isn’t perfect but I’d put him in good optics / in line with Green objectives. I’m very open to understanding your viewpoint on this.
Reposted by Charlotte
The BBC says there is a “safety debate”.
There’s not really a debate if you a pedestrian.
Research: “children 82% more likely to be killed if struck by an SUV or LTV rather than smaller vehicle.”
www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/n...
There’s not really a debate if you a pedestrian.
Research: “children 82% more likely to be killed if struck by an SUV or LTV rather than smaller vehicle.”
www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/n...
Being hit by an SUV increases the likelihood of death or serious injury | LSHTM
The likelihood of a pedestrian or cyclist being fatally injured is 44% higher if they are hit by a sports utility vehicle (SUV) or light truck vehicle (LTV) compared with smaller passenger cars, new
www.lshtm.ac.uk
December 3, 2025 at 7:53 AM
The BBC says there is a “safety debate”.
There’s not really a debate if you a pedestrian.
Research: “children 82% more likely to be killed if struck by an SUV or LTV rather than smaller vehicle.”
www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/n...
There’s not really a debate if you a pedestrian.
Research: “children 82% more likely to be killed if struck by an SUV or LTV rather than smaller vehicle.”
www.lshtm.ac.uk/newsevents/n...
I called a boss a c*nt, when he was being one, and he respected me more after it. But that was hospitality and he did have some self awareness. Good luck
December 2, 2025 at 10:48 AM
I called a boss a c*nt, when he was being one, and he respected me more after it. But that was hospitality and he did have some self awareness. Good luck
I have one every 12 stitches (so over 30 now) and I still drop / gain stitches as I’m going. I can fix it but how do I get so lost!
November 23, 2025 at 9:46 AM
I have one every 12 stitches (so over 30 now) and I still drop / gain stitches as I’m going. I can fix it but how do I get so lost!
Love it! Also I’m very here for your knitting projects photos! I’m following a pattern for a shawl and it turns out I can’t count for love nor money!
November 23, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Love it! Also I’m very here for your knitting projects photos! I’m following a pattern for a shawl and it turns out I can’t count for love nor money!
Reposted by Charlotte
If the EHRC had their way we'd see all women forced back into wearing only skirts and dresses and wearing their hair long lest they be suspected of being trans and banned from going to the toilet.
That's what this is suggesting. Masculine women being denied access alongside trans people.
That's what this is suggesting. Masculine women being denied access alongside trans people.
![The guidance said that if transgender people are excluded from a space, organisations should consider whether there is a suitable alternative for them and that it would not be proportionate to leave them without essential services, such as access to lavatories.
But it also outlines how in some cases that may not be possible owing to the physical constraints of buildings or high costs. It said: “It may be that offering alternative arrangements is not reasonably possible […] this may be because of the type of service being provided, the needs of the service users, the physical constraints of any building, or because of the disproportionate financial costs associated with making those arrangements.”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:movr4wsu2du5xbmeragyr5cx/bafkreigp3qse73rzhl2czgxgbmpzectwrb4hdwxk44fm52m7l7cu36mwaa@jpeg)
November 19, 2025 at 10:49 PM
If the EHRC had their way we'd see all women forced back into wearing only skirts and dresses and wearing their hair long lest they be suspected of being trans and banned from going to the toilet.
That's what this is suggesting. Masculine women being denied access alongside trans people.
That's what this is suggesting. Masculine women being denied access alongside trans people.
I’m interested in a talk about the medical history of Frankenstein, to be honest, I’m interested in most talks you might wish to do!
November 18, 2025 at 11:12 PM
I’m interested in a talk about the medical history of Frankenstein, to be honest, I’m interested in most talks you might wish to do!
@zackpolanski.bsky.social Labour MP trying to use your messaging! Your message is the path forward!!!
November 18, 2025 at 6:14 PM
@zackpolanski.bsky.social Labour MP trying to use your messaging! Your message is the path forward!!!
When is the headline to order a new ballot paper, why can’t we order a new ballot paper through the website. Also, why is ‘my details’ not accessible on the website?
November 14, 2025 at 3:17 PM
When is the headline to order a new ballot paper, why can’t we order a new ballot paper through the website. Also, why is ‘my details’ not accessible on the website?
Were the spots in Glasgow necropolis used for thwarting resurrectionists or used for more general holding? (I did a tour years ago and I can’t remember)
November 11, 2025 at 7:24 PM
Were the spots in Glasgow necropolis used for thwarting resurrectionists or used for more general holding? (I did a tour years ago and I can’t remember)