I suspect that a lot of these errors are due to people using educational materials or example code from fields where within-subject and repeated measures are uncommon.

Whenever I see these articles on 'publish or perish' culture being to blame, I always think of Tal Yarkoni's blog post: talyarkoni.org/blog/2018/10.... Yes, the pressures are there and they can force our hand, but that means we should work to improve the structures where we can (not abide by them).

You can't add numbers without checking for normality first!!!!

The first step of multiplication is checking for heteroscedasticity!!!

💀

📌

While I understand the concern about motives, it shouldn't necessarily impeach any outcomes, as long as there isn't any indication of funder interference. Otherwise, the same concerns would hold for all research funded by the Trump administration (NIH, NSF, etc.).

The NYT is my quintessential example of a service that I will never sign up for again. They make everything too difficult to quit.

The way many US jobs come with medical coverage, this one also needs legal coverage.

📌

That's a great start, but that law should apply to sales taxes too.