Stupidcomputer
@stupidcomputer.bsky.social
190 followers 210 following 1.3K posts
29 epochs/he/bi German lover of the net | Not a friend of AI | Forced to use Premiere+AE All rights reserved
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
This just made me realize I never put my dumb color of magic edits on here. So here are two out of three because Bluesky only allows 60 second videos and one is 70 seconds.
chuckwendig.bsky.social
It may feel weird or somehow improper to talk about your art or your writing, but we need it. It can’t be wall-to-wall nightmare all the time. Art is both counterweight and context. It’s escape and enlightenment and a mirror of our own exasperation. We need it. We NEED it. Keep showing us.
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
The court finds that posts do not constitute a reality
joshuajfriedman.com
"The views expressed by users @kaioken8026, @mrright8439, and @ZxZNebula ... do not alter the Court’s analysis."
The Court holds, based upon a full consideration of the context in which “Not Like Us” was published, that a reasonable listener could not have concluded that “Not Like Us” was conveying objective facts about Drake. The views expressed by users @kaioken8026, @mrright8439, and @ZxZNebula, and the other YouTube and Instagram commentators quoted in the Complaint, Am. Compl., ¶¶ 73-74, do not alter the Court’s analysis. In a world in which billions of people are active online, support for almost any proposition, no matter how farfetched, fantastical or unreasonable, can be found with little effort in any number of comment sections, chat rooms, and servers. “[T]hat some readers may infer a defamatory meaning from a statement does not necessarily render the inference reasonable under the circumstances.” Jacobus, 51 N.Y.S.3d at 336.
Reposted by Stupidcomputer
caseyexplosion.bsky.social
As well as this, I feel quite strongly that the increased prominence in recent years of social media influencers who engage in nothing but ragebait content and harassment has proverbially sucked all the air out of the room, content mills producing bullshit at speed who dominate gaming conversations.
spookycutewitch.bsky.social
“Why isn’t anyone covering our indie games?”

1. The gaming press has been decimated by business suits, and the whims of an uncaring search engine behemoth
2. Doing the job means you get death threats and harassment
3. There are more games released in 1 week than there were in entire months in 2015
Reposted by Stupidcomputer
brandrawsthings.bsky.social
kratt you FREAK. leave silksong alone
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
I can't believe I thought just a few years ago that the world would not get dumber after NFTs
Reposted by Stupidcomputer
mguariglia.bsky.social
A few found cars is enough to appease folks that mass surveillance is OK for those small wins but here are the important takeaways: 1. Police are so shockingly cozy with the multi-billion dollar companies that sell surveillance tech that you have to ask who is actually making policy.
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
"Move fast and break things" should include your own company and reputation in the things that can be broken.
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
You come into my feed and slander my husbando like that?
Bernd das Brot looking judgingly.
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
Watching some old CCC talks and I think if I ever got an error like "EROOR_INTERNET_INSERT_CDROM" after any kind of API call, I would die laughing.
Slide from a CCC talk showing some return codes from different APIs. Notably the ERROR_INTERNET_INSERT_CDROM error will make some people feel old because they have at least an idea what it could mean to insert a CD for internet access.
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
Killing the AI industry because it can't ask artists for permission sounds like a good idea, we should try that.
keithwdickinson.bsky.social
Today is a day when arts degrees are worthless, but the product of those degrees is so valuable it would kill an entire industry if they were made to pay for it.
theverge.com
Nick Clegg says asking artists for use permission would ‘kill’ the AI industry
Reposted by Stupidcomputer
aceottorney.bsky.social
Proud to announce Deviant Legal’s Game Developer’s Guide to Publishing Agreements: a free resource for developers wanting to learn about publishing deals. Publicly accessible, without requiring to provide your data: deviantlegal.com/guide/game-d...
An image about the game developer's guide to publishing agreements feauturing otto the otter
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
It should be illegal for a 500*500 image to take up 1MB but allas. Also debugging JS feels less fun after fighting with c++ for so long. I now have a decoder that produces black images in the browser and as a treat also leaks memory. At least I can decode something so parts do work.
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
"Noem isn't chicken" is an odd sentence. Like, the chicken guy is clearly down there. Has Noem also a chicken suit but forgot it that day?
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
👏 it's 👏 her 👏 turn 👏 (/s if that's not obvious)
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
Testing stuff and making my IDE hate me.
A bunch of hex numbers followed by the notification "show more (10.1 KB)"
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
You don't even need an LLM. Sentiment analysis is like an old natural language processing thing and I am honestly suprised that google does not seem to use it for their self prompted questions.
Reposted by Stupidcomputer
lolennui.bsky.social
George Orwell’s Animal Crossing
Someone in a frog costume facing down a line of police in riot gear
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
Got to the Epilogue. Great game and I think I will 100% it in time. For now thoough I am going to enjoy some FFT
Fates Fulfilled
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
I had 80 hours in the game before the launch, so I am not as enthusiasticly posting about my runs now. But imo it is hades 1 legendary. The mechanics are polished, the voice work and soundtrack are phenomenal, and the art is the right amount of horny.
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
It's just... of course there have always been fun problems with search engine algorithms and ways to game them. But seeing a google feature use a quote from an article about how that quote is not true feels like a new layer of dumb problems (at least it cites its source I guess).
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
I love how when i google that, the proposed question and answer source an article about how this is not real, but reads like it is. Online search is real fun nowadays.
Screenshot of google after searching for austria hungary spaceprogram. It proposes the question "Did Austria-Hungary go to space?" Andf provides the incorrect Answer "In 1889 Austria-Hungary conducted its first manned orbital spaceflight using a liquid-fueled rocket launched from the region of Galicia. In 1908 the nation successfully landed 30 astronauts in the Phaethontis quadrangle region of Mars, where they constructed a temporary research outpost and remained for one year. 01.09.2024" which sources a Defector article about this answer being from a fun viral tweet, but because google does not know it, it looks like this article provides the ifno that indeed sucha  spaceprogram existed.
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
While I do believe the archive footage was used because, well that was the last time the insurrection act was used, the proposed image here is definetly a better capture of the current moment in which the possibility of its invocation exists.
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
If you click on the article you get the context which is of course missing in the sharepic. It is a fascinating thing; I can see someone using that image as example of 'how bad it currently is' because (wanted) context collapse allows for total anachronism of media.
CNN Article picture with the subline:
"Two National guardsmen stand guard outside a burning donut shop in Los Angeles on April 30, 1992. The National Guard was called in to aid police during the second day of rioting in the city.
Mark Elias/AP"
stupidcomputer.bsky.social
Ok this one I find interesting because there is a clash here between the standard use of illustratitive archive footage (a picture from the last time the act was invoked, I think) and the current media climate where manipulated images are used as justifications for the thing the article is about.