That seems to be the general thought.
It always sounds like companies are afraid they might be missing out on huge benefits in the future if they don't lean into AI in one way or another. But I'm not sure how much the pressure from competitors plays into this.

I feel like one of the many effects of LLMs on our industry is going to be making it really clear that the coding was never the hard part.

The greatest irony of the AI booster is they're oftentimes not actually fans of AI. Boosterism is a kind of religion, where technology is a means of proving intellectual and philosophical superiority by telling half-truths about software sold by billionaires.
www.wheresyoured.at/how-to-argue...

laugh all you want, but I just bit into a blueberry and there were three bees inside

Fully outsource? With LLMs available to the general public, which "learn" from dreck floating around the Internet, most of which is at best wrong and at worst malevolent, one ought not outsource *any* thinking, much less critical thinking, to "Artificial so-called Intelligence."

After the $400m hack, Clorox and Cognizant traded words and legal filings, each trying to blame the other.

An LLM doesn't point fingers back.

And if a vibe-coded app built by a non-coder does something truly catastrophic, who is truly to blame?

whatwelost.substack.com/p/mediocrity...