Tamar Haspel
@tamarhaspel.bsky.social
16K followers 420 following 2.4K posts
James Beard winning WaPo columnist writing about food & science, author of TO BOLDLY GROW, gentleman oyster farmer.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Tamar Haspel
tairnews.bsky.social
"Assistant Professor, Biology at University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
*Application Deadline: 11/17/2025"

Read more here: https://unc.peopleadmin.com/postings/307414

#PlantSciJobs
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
As the new EAT-Lancet Report sparks more Meat Wars, here's what you need to know:

- The enviro case against beef/lamb is strong
- The enviro case against poultry/pork is meh
- The human health case against meat is weak (except for sat fat content, which is strong)

Go forth and enjoy food.
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
So, interacting with sycophants leads to increased self-perception ... hmmmm ...
steverathje.bsky.social
🚨 New preprint 🚨

Across 3 experiments (n = 3,285), we found that interacting with sycophantic (or overly agreeable) AI chatbots entrenched attitudes and led to inflated self-perceptions.

Yet, people preferred sycophantic chatbots and viewed them as unbiased!

osf.io/preprints/ps...

Thread 🧵
Abstract and results summary
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
Yes - lots of granularity! I don't think NHANES is accurate enough to tease out changes. USDA data shows loss-adjusted veg data basically basically flat-lined since the 80s. But if the category drops in price vis a vis other foods without increased consumption, surely that tells us *something.*
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
Yes but all the increase came before the time we're talking about.
Reposted by Tamar Haspel
thomasjwood.bsky.social
The last time I posted the income relationship to presidential vote among White respondents to the @electionstudies.bsky.social ANES, people asked for additional estimates among all voters.

Updated estimates here:
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
The money goes to the media outlet. Which, in turn, has to pay journalists.

Journalists are getting squeezed out primarily because it's almost impossible to run a real news organization at a reasonable profit.
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
I don't know that we can. I think the game probably is lost.
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
Why don't we have more good journalism?

Mostly, because people are unwilling to pay for it.

We have, collectively, gotten the idea that information should be free for the reading.

You can't complain about lousy reporting & analysis and also gripe about paywalls.
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
You know all those journal articles that say "data available on request?"

It's mostly bullshit.

Only 17% of articles claiming it actually delivered the data.

@ianhussey.mmmdata.io reports.

open.lnu.se/index.php/me...
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
Anybody else getting an influx of bot followers this morning?
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
OK, OK, we'll make them nutritional epidemiologists does that make you happy?
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
These are the villains! TV shows need villains!
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
THE P-HACKERS

This brilliant, ruthless group of statisticians will stop at nothing to get publishable results.
statsepi.bsky.social
14 new shows a year about medical doctors. Zero shows ever about medical statisticians. WTF!?
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
Lemme check back with you in 34 ...
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
I think it depends on which direction you think they're off! Mostly, people think industrial ag is worse than it is. And it can be bad! But it can also be good. I also think a general dislike of industrial ag is what motivates specific stuff - anti-glyphosate, anti-GMO. Those are handholds.
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
I'm a long-time organic supporter, mostly because it's a way for farmers to find like-minded consumers, and is therefore more profitable.

That said, public perception is WAY out of line with organic reality. People think the benefits are much bigger than they are, and they don't see the downsides.
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
Yeah, that's a huge one.
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
How come illegal & unconstitutional shit just keeps on happening??
tamarhaspel.bsky.social
Yes, I think the problem isn't so much the study per se as the overreach in interpretation. It's that pesky causal inference issue.