Reasoned argument and exploration of opposing views terrifies some people

Unfortunately, it is for this reason that every issue these days ends up polarised… Zealots often don’t realise they are zealots

Indeed, that is the definition of inclusion and equality

I love the children’s book ‘the whispering town’

It was particularly awful when she said people should dress how they like and love whoever they want to love before setting up rape crisis centres, championing womens rights and spending millions in philanthropy

Toxic indeed!

Whether far left, or far right, extremism on either wing is something to be condemned by any rational person, but without deliberate intervention, polarisation and intolerance of opposing opinion will only increase

We need to give our populations critical thinking skills. A mass education programme

According to people in the room, yes 🤷🏻‍♂️

To quote Alex Neil (SNP)

“Contrary to what Nicola Sturgeon claims, Alex Salmond was NOT opposed to the gay marriage legislation. I was the Health Secretary who took the Bill through Parliament at Alex request. He told me that Nicola didn’t want to do it any longer as she was fed up with it”

🤷🏻‍♂️

It was great opportunity to some unique insight into many of her questionable decisions and the allegations made by her colleagues

But the softball questions with no challenging of her answers was disappointing

Changing notes after the fact to try and get a colleague sacked sounds like gross misconduct

Silly goose 🤦🏻‍♂️

My evidence, of the misgendering?

It is documented in the real time tribunal transcription: x.com/tribunaltwee...

You are welcome 👍🏼