Tobia Spampatti, PhD
@tspampatti.bsky.social
5.9K followers 810 following 190 posts
PhD in Neuroscience, NYU Psychology Visiting Postdoc. I study the social and affective psychological factors that make people care and discuss about societal, systemic issues like climate change, technology, and disinformation. Likes=bookmarks
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
justinhendrix.bsky.social
Macron remarks are notable- some quotes: "We have been incredibly naive in entrusting our democratic space to social networks that are controlled either by large American entrepreneurs or large Chinese companies, whose interests are not at all the survival or proper functioning of our democracies."
defenddemocracy.bsky.social
President Macron: “Europeans, let's wake up!

We have been incredibly naive in entrusting our democratic space to social networks.”

defenddemocracy.eu/macron-democ...
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
anneapplebaum.bsky.social
President Macron:
“We were very naive to leave our public space to social media networks controlled by US or Chinese companies that don’t share our interests and not interested in survival of our democracies.”
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MggN...
French President Macron Speaks at German Unity Day Ceremony | WION LIVE
YouTube video by WION
www.youtube.com
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
petescarbs.bsky.social
Climate and food scientists: Hey everyone, here's a massive report showing how we need to make radical changes to our diet to avoid environmental catastrophe, but if we did it we could have amazing health benefits!

UK media:
a dirt road going through a desert landscape with mountains in the background
ALT: a dirt road going through a desert landscape with mountains in the background
media.tenor.com
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
jayvanbavel.bsky.social
In a new paper, we find that sycophantic #AI chatbots make people more extreme--operating like an echo chamber

Yet, people prefer sycophantic chatbots and see them as less biased

Only open-minded people prefer disagreeable chatbots: osf.io/preprints/ps...

Led by @steverathje.bsky.social
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
steverathje.bsky.social
🚨 New preprint 🚨

Across 3 experiments (n = 3,285), we found that interacting with sycophantic (or overly agreeable) AI chatbots entrenched attitudes and led to inflated self-perceptions.

Yet, people preferred sycophantic chatbots and viewed them as unbiased!

osf.io/preprints/ps...

Thread 🧵
Abstract and results summary
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
jbakcoleman.bsky.social
One of the loudest bells tolling for social science right now is that the decade of abundant data on humans is coming to a close. Whether you work on digital trace or surveys, LLM pollution is a serious problem, even while the wide roll out of LLMs creates an urgent need for social science.
dingdingpeng.the100.ci
A lot of psych is already conducted with online convenience samples & ppl are probably excited about silicon samples bc it would allow them to crank out more studies for even less 💸

How about we reconsider the idea that sciencey science involves collecting own data.
www.science.org/content/arti...
AI-generated ‘participants’ can lead social science experiments astray, study finds
Data produced by “silicon samples” depends on researchers’ exact choice of models, prompts, and settings
www.science.org
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
jayvanbavel.bsky.social
Our data suggest that AI’s perceived neutrality could help reduce “echo chambers” by broadening people’s exposure to diverse information--so long as AI systems remain trusted as impartial and prioritize accuracy. osf.io/preprints/ps...
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
jayvanbavel.bsky.social
People trusted ingroup over outgroup sources, but...
- In a political fact-checking task, people preferred AI over outgroup and ingroup sources
- We found a similar pattern for a task that was completely unrelated to identity
- This was not driven by priors, but by how people accumulate evidence
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
jayvanbavel.bsky.social
Our new paper finds that AI can overcome partisan #bias

We find that AI sources are preferred over ingroup and outgroup sources--even when people know both are equally accurate (N = 1,600+): osf.io/preprints/ps...
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
dgarcia.eu
🚨Call for papers for the 2026 Inequality conference in Konstanz. I'm co-organizing it and we welcome submissions from Computational Social Science. The deadline is approaching quickly!
inequality-conference.de
In_equality Conference 2026
The "Politics of Inequality” research center invites interdisciplinary & international researchers to Konstanz, Germany, for the In_equality Conference, 15-17 April 2026.
inequality-conference.de
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
fernandoblancopsy.com
ICYMI: We are hiring a postodoctoral researcher to join us at @cimcyc.bsky.social (Granada, Spain) to study mis/disinformation.

🚨 Only a few days left to apply!
fernandoblancopsy.com
We are offering a 2-year postdoctoral position at CIMCyC (Granada, Spain) to work on the psychology of dis(mis)information.

Apply before 26th September. Nice city, great environment ☺️

Please share! 🔃

cimcyc.ugr.es/en/informati...

#socialpsychology
#cogpsyc
#PsychSciSky
#PsychJob
#PhDJob
Job Offer: Postdoctoral Researcher in Disinformation
As part of the strategic plan linked to the María de Maeztu Seal of Excellence award, the CIMCYC is recruiting a postdoctoral researcher with experience in the field of the psychology of disinformatio...
cimcyc.ugr.es
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
swordsjew.bsky.social
*watching innocent people rapidly acquire the cursed knowledge that has driven me to madness* oh no
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
tspampatti.bsky.social
Perspectives on Psychological Science, Social Psychology and Personality Review, or Psychological Inquiry would be my guess (can you tell I am psych trained?)
tspampatti.bsky.social
Yes it is :) repetition is a pretty strong persuasive tool in our arsenal!
Reposted by Tobia Spampatti, PhD
mikeybiddlestone.bsky.social
🚨New open access paper out in BJP special issue "Psychological Understanding of Misinformation and Disinformation in the Face of Environmental Crises"!

“Fighting fire with fire: Prebunking with the use of a plausible meta-conspiracy framing” 🧵👇 1/12
📖 doi.org/10.1111/bjop...
Landing page for our article "Fighting fire with fire: Prebunking with the use of a plausible meta-conspiracy framing" published in the British Journal of Psychology
tspampatti.bsky.social
Yes to all! I think we're talking past each other :) I argue these outcomes are important as a general end goal, but also bc they can be affected by misinfo. As such, they should be studied alongside discernment, especially bc protecting other outcomes from misinfo may be more imp than discernment
tspampatti.bsky.social
but I try to raise awareness that we should also consider those outcomes in misinfo research as well, bc I would argue that misinfo affects those outcomes beyond discernment. To your last point, I think @jgranadossamayoa.bsky.social shows bypassing can be better than misinfo interventions sometimes!
tspampatti.bsky.social
Thank you Gordon! I agree with you - the point I was trying to make is that there are more outcomes of relevance than just truth discernment for studies of 1) misinfo susceptibility and 2) misinfo interventions. I agree other outcomes are common to other fields (psych and political persuasion)...
tspampatti.bsky.social
I am very grateful to @sachaltay.bsky.social Jon Roozenbeek and @profsanderlinden.bsky.social for the engaging reviews for the past year :) I think the paper is in a better state thanks to their feedback! 6/
tspampatti.bsky.social
are 1) measuring the efficacy of interventions on multiple psychological and societally relevant outcomes will better explain susceptibility to misinformation. And 2) synthetically modelling (i.e., ABMs) the effects of misinformation on relevant outcomes at scale.

4/