Unlearning Economics
@unlearnecon.bsky.social
8.7K followers 760 following 910 posts
Economist, YouTuber, gamer, author, academic (in that order)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Unlearning Economics
unlearnecon.bsky.social
THIS IS NOT A DRILL! My actual book launch event - which is only 6 months late - is at LSE October 13th, you can sign up here:

www.lse.ac.uk/events/why-w...
unlearnecon.bsky.social
Just logged onto twitter thinking "it can't make me that mad"

Oh boy was I wrong
unlearnecon.bsky.social
This report on the way heterodox economists were treated at the University of Manitoba is absolutely infuriating

drive.google.com/file/d/1pXe1...
caut-ahic-report---manitoba-economics-(2015-01).pdf
drive.google.com
unlearnecon.bsky.social
Interesting one for @dsquareddigest.bsky.social: who should be accountable in this situation?
'We want them off the payroll,' Met chief tells BBC after secret filming exposes officers' misogyny and racism
Sir Mark Rowley insists he won't resign - adding that in the Met it's "the misogynists and racists frankly who want me out".
unlearnecon.bsky.social
POV: you allowed people to talk about the labour theory of value in your subreddit www.reddit.com/r/Unlearning...
The UE Subreddit being overtaken by LTV threads.
unlearnecon.bsky.social
Well yeah, the burden of proof rests on the person claiming the matrix is relevant to trade in reality, not on me to prove that it isn’t!
unlearnecon.bsky.social
Shockingly, this point was anticipated in the video. The Portugal-England history raises issues like development of industry over time, terms of trade, and finance - all of which are absent from ricardo‘s matrix.

The lesson is, as always, don’t read the comments!

bsky.app/profile/natj...
natjdyer.bsky.social
I might write something about this kind of comment (left on @unlearnecon.bsky.social recent video).

I see no value at all in 'proving' in a perfectly contextless world that countries A & B could benefit form trading X & Y.

What makes anyone think this logic then maps onto reality?
Comment that reads: 'I understand that the example of England and Portugal maybe only worked because of the slaves and the gold, that doesn't matter for the sake of the argument, as well as the moral value of that episode. You can change the names of the countries for fictional ones, and change the products for letters like product A and B. for the argument you are making in this video you have to prove mathematically that the theorem doesn't work. And if the perfect scenario in which it work is unattainable, you have to explain why it will always be unattainable and then put the example in numbers if you don't do that, then, as you said you don't understand the theorem of comparative advantage. You really don't get this or in reality you really are not interested with anything else but to prove your point even if it rests on flawed logic?'
Reposted by Unlearning Economics
Reposted by Unlearning Economics
localnotail.bsky.social
unforgettable television
Reposted by Unlearning Economics
unlearnecon.bsky.social
@jdportes.bsky.social been following you on immigration for a long time and love you work, any chance you'd like to chat on my channel?
unlearnecon.bsky.social
Somehow it make sense that the right's idea of a public intellectual is basically a PR strategy
unlearnecon.bsky.social
THIS IS NOT A DRILL! My actual book launch event - which is only 6 months late - is at LSE October 13th, you can sign up here:

www.lse.ac.uk/events/why-w...
unlearnecon.bsky.social
You should watched the documentary Merci, padron!
unlearnecon.bsky.social
I reliably get ill after releasing a video, even one that didn’t seem particularly stressful to make
unlearnecon.bsky.social
I like them, but I can understand why someone wouldn‘t