@wendyndavis.bsky.social
530 followers 710 following 300 posts
Journalist covering law and technology
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted
nycsouthpaw.bsky.social
All that time we spent studying the Fourth Amendment and the Roberts Court just turns it off in the shadow docket
wendyndavis.bsky.social
FTC stops work due to shutdown.

Tells court: "Absent an appropriation, FTC attorneys and other employees are prohibited from working, even on a voluntary basis, except in very limited circumstances..."
Reposted
jeffjarvis.bsky.social
"Shattered norms"? No, this shatters the rule of law: a prosecution based solely on the order of a dictator, not due process. The fascism is under your nose, #BrokenTimes
Trump Gets the Retribution He Sought, and Shatters Norms in the Process www.nytimes.com/2025/09/25/u...
Trump Gets the Retribution He Sought, and Shatters Norms in the Process
www.nytimes.com
Reposted
wendyndavis.bsky.social
SCOTUS blocks Slaughter return to FTC and orders briefing on issues including whether Humphrey's Executor should be overturned.

Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson dissent.
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...
wendyndavis.bsky.social
Judge rejects Meta's motion to dismiss claims it broke contract with users and violated duty of good faith in suit over fraudulent ads on Facebook.

prior coverage: www.mediapost.com/publications...
wendyndavis.bsky.social
VPPA class-action against @NBCUniversalclaims company discloses "private video viewing history with (PII) in the form of names, email addresses, and/or GPS location to third-party identity service providers through tracking technology embedded in each of the NBC Apps."
Reposted
nycsouthpaw.bsky.social
What are the names of the U.S. Navy officers carrying out these orders to serially bomb civilian boats that pose no threat to their own vessels, killing everyone aboard? Surely they’ll want to take personal credit for this honorable service and perhaps wear a little campaign medal on their chest.
Reposted
evanbernick.bsky.social
I know the case law. I also think the language of “jawboning“ makes this more complicated than it should be. everyone knows what coercion means. threatening to do X or else is coercion. if the government coerces people into shutting up or shutting others up, it’s a free speech problem.
bartona104.bsky.social
'Carr’s threats against ABC appear to be “a pretty clear-cut case of jawboning.” Jawboning refers to a type of informal coercion where government officials try to pressure private entities into suppressing or changing speech without using any actual formal legal action' www.wired.com/story/brenda...
Brendan Carr Isn't Going to Stop Until Someone Makes Him
In the wake of Jimmy Kimmel's suspension, experts say the FCC commissioner's conduct is flatly unconstitutional. They also expect him to keep going.
www.wired.com
Reposted
ronfilipkowski.bsky.social
Do not mock Supreme Leader Trump.

Supreme Leader Trump sensitive snowflake.

Supreme Leader Trump must be worshipped, revered and shown proper respect.

We will come after you.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

- Regime of the Golden Age & Delicate Flowers
Reposted
barackobama.bsky.social
After years of complaining about cancel culture, the current administration has taken it to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like.
Let’s be clear about what happened to Jimmy Kimmel
Trump’s most brazen attack on free speech yet.
www.yahoo.com
Reposted
kenwhite.bsky.social
/9 I previously described Kimmel’s potential case as “plausible,” which on reflection was too arch to be clear — based on Carr’s explicit threats and the sequence of events I’d say it’s a very strong case of violation of the First Amendment through coercion.
Reposted
zackbeauchamp.bsky.social
It's not just the authoritarianism — it's how shameless, how *gleeful* this administration is about it
Reposted
brendannyhan.bsky.social
"There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."
wendyndavis.bsky.social
Carr's views as of October 2024:
Reposted
rtushnet.bsky.social
The lawsuit is a statement of contempt for truth, the American public, the judicial process, & everything that deserves our respect in the American tradition. To assess its legal defects (eg complaints about Fred Trump—a man who cannot be defamed) ignores its purpose: to suppress criticism of Trump.
audrelawdamercy.bsky.social
This lawsuit is so fuckin embarrassing for everyone involved

Also great job orgs that were like yeah we'll just pay him the bribe I mean uh settlement and surely he'll go away and leave us alone and not develop an even larger appetite, no I've never read If You Give a Mouse Cookie what's that
Reposted
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Sinclair is demanding that Kimmel apologize to the family (?) and also "make a meaningful personal donation to the Kirk Family and Turning Point USA"

Are you fucking kidding me? It's not enough they got him fired, they want him to grovel and send money to these anti-free speech grifters?
thedesk.net
#BREAKING: Sinclair says it will air a one-hour tribute to Charlie Kirk on its ABC-affiliated stations in the time slot that is usually occupied for "Jimmy Kimmel Live." The special will air on Friday, per a Sinclair spokesperson.
Reposted
kenwhite.bsky.social
/2 However, I think ABC firing Kimmel following Carr’s threats makes a plausible case for a First Amendment violation. It should survive a motion to dismiss at least.
Reposted
notaaroncraig.bsky.social
This is extortion and censorship. Brendan Carr is turning into a mob boss: “the easy way or the hard way,” really?

What about the American way? The constitutional way?

Shame on ABC for capitulating and on Nexstar for greedily aiding and abetting this farce.
Reposted
karlbode.com
this is quite genuinely insane, and I want to believe the backlash to this will be severe
ABC Pulls Jimmy Kimmel Off Air for Charlie Kirk Comments
www.nytimes.com
Reposted
jeffstein.bsky.social
Statement from @postguild.bsky.social on the firing of Karen Attiah:
Reposted
dankennedy.net
I'm pretty sure that @karenattiah.bsky.social is the first @washingtonpost.com journo to be fired for expressing herself since the current craziness set in. Everyone else has quit in protest. Seems like Post staff members ought to take some sort of dramatic action, no?
Reposted
mmasnick.bsky.social
Government officials in the "party of free speech" looking to use the power of the state to punish people for their free speech. Again.

It's almost like they were never actually serious about free speech.
A tweet from Congressman Randy Fine.

Those celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk must be thrown out of civil society.
If you are aware of anyone in the 6th District of Florida - or heck, anywhere in the state - who works at any level of government, works for an entity that gets money from government (health care, university), or holds a professional license (lawyer, medical professional, teacher) that is publicly celebrating the violence, please contact my office. I will demand their firing, defunding, and license revocation.
If you don't think I am serious, I got two State University Board Chairman fired for less.
These monsters want a fight? Congratulations; they got one.