Yashvin Seetahul
@yashvin.bsky.social
230 followers 700 following 65 posts
Psychology PhD Student Aggression, Emotion, Methods, Cumulative Science, Partially Overlapping Density Plots, Pizza, Nontrailblazing Discoveries
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
erichehman.bsky.social
I unfortunately think demand characteristics are an underappreciated cause of a lot of effects in the lit
nicholascoles.bsky.social
New 📰

Demand characteristics are a fundamental methodological concern in research with humans

Yet little is known about the magnitude and consistency of these effects

In a new paper, I, M. Wyatt, and @mcxfrank.bsky.social take stock of what we’ve learned via meta-analysis

doi.org/10.1525/coll...
A Meta-Analysis of the Impact and Heterogeneity of Explicit Demand Characteristics
Demand characteristics are a fundamental methodological concern in experimental psychology. Yet, little is known about the direction, magnitude, and consistency of their effects. We conducted a three-...
doi.org
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
jdlong.cerebralmastication.com
New code review response just dropped:
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
vilgothuhn.bsky.social
Anyone familiar with robust regression for heavy-tailed residuals? Seems there are many alternatives. The only method I've learned is Bayesian regression with regularizing priors (from @rmcelreath.bsky.social book) and for the moment I want a frequentist alternative (sorry Bayesians) #stats #rstats
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
laloalcaraz.bsky.social
Was it worth it? #massshootings #schoolshootings #charliekirk #guncontrol Please share #laloalcaraz cartoons
yashvin.bsky.social
Yes! There are some YT channels where they show the timeseries of blood sugar after eating specific food combinations. It's really interesting to see. I'd be obsessed with checking all the time if I had this. But 150/200 euros a month would feel like an expensive obsession to me 😅
yashvin.bsky.social
The only thing missing in the app is the ability to track time varying confounders 🫣
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
brettmurpsych.bsky.social
Want to know what a sample of 200+ editorial board members think about citing practices in psychology? That and much more in this AMPPS article. We had a lot of fun pulling it together. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
mbneff.bsky.social
For those interested, here's our full preprint on the call for more transparent pilot study reporting: osf.io/preprints/ps...

@ihandleyminer.bsky.social #OpenScience #PilotStudies
mbneff.bsky.social
"Don't seat the baby near the door" 👶 Thanks to @infantstudies.bsky.social for the chance to discuss our task force work on making pilot study insights more transparent to improve psyc science!

@agataboch.bsky.social #OpenScience #DevPsySky #PilotStudies #PsychScience #Transparency
infantstudies.bsky.social
New on the Baby Blog - Making pilots public and improving developmental science by @agataboch.bsky.social and @mbneff.bsky.social #EarlyYears #DevPsySky #PsychSciSky #science #research #infantstudies infantstudies.org/making-pilot...
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
hloenneker.bsky.social
Feel free to write us an e-mail at [email protected], join the conversation on here or visit our website for more information: pilotreportingtf.github.io. 2/4
Pilot Reporting Task Force
🚀
pilotreportingtf.github.io
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
hloenneker.bsky.social
As part of the Pilot Reporting Task Force, founded at @improvingpsych.org conference 2023, I would like to share a preprint with you: osf.io/preprints/ps.... We are looking for feedback on our perspective piece, promoting more transparency in the reporting of piloting in psychological science. 1/4
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
cameronbrick.bsky.social
Do I know any experienced wikipedia editors? I'm confused about why a submission is being rejected (without specificity as to what content doesn't meet guidelines).
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
bryanculbertson.com
Reminder to donate to Wikipedia every time the Trump regime tries to censor them

donate.wikimedia.org/wiki/Ways_to...
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
gregpriest.bsky.social
New study on #BlueSky for #SciComm.

“Bluesky posts demonstrate substantially higher levels of interaction (likes, reposts, replies, and quotes) and greater textual originality than previously reported for X, suggesting both stronger interactive and more interpretive engagement.”

🦋🦫🌱🐋🧪 #philsci
Research posts on Bluesky are more original — and get better engagement
Bluesky posts about science garner more likes and reposts than similar ones on X.
www.nature.com
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
briannosek.bsky.social
10 years ago?! Holy smokes.
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
It’s fascinating to argue that LLMs mimic humans when they’re producing effects that aren’t replicated in humans.
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
jamiecummins.bsky.social
So, as evidence of "mimicry", we have the LLM exhibiting effect sizes in the 90th-98th percentile of effects seen in studies of human beings in a paradigm where humans do not replicably show the effect. Not very compelling IMO.

mmmdata.io/posts/2025/0...
If researchers find Cohen's *d* = 8, no they didn't
I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about the plausibility of standardized effect sizes in the last year. From a trustworthiness assessment perspective, (standardized) effect sizes have a great combinat...
mmmdata.io
yashvin.bsky.social
Failure of imagination of alternative interpretations in itself is not an issue, but it's the taboo of admitting a mistake...

If these same concerns had been brought up prior to publication (e.g., colleagues, reviewers, editor), I'm sure authors would be more open to considering alternative views.
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
jamiecummins.bsky.social
This has now been published in PNAS!

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

The original authors also posted a reply:

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

Quick thread on some additional thoughts and then I'm probably done talking about this one 🧵
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
lisaspantig.com
Why LLMs are not a substitute for humans in research on human behavior:

Human participants were responsive to semantic nuances that LLMs didn't pick up.

Example: Cut their beard to shame someone vs cut their beard to shave someone.

#Econsky
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
lakens.bsky.social
If you are preparing your bachelor statistics course and would like to add optional material for students to better understand statistics on a conceptual level (see topics in the screenshot) my free textbook provides a state of the art overview. lakens.github.io/statistical_...
Reposted by Yashvin Seetahul
thomvolker.bsky.social
Been working on a tutorial on synthetic data for open science for @lmu-osc.bsky.social
A draft version is now up: lmu-osc.github.io/synthetic-da...

It covers model building, evaluating synthetic data utility with density ratio estimation, and disclosure risk.

Feedback is very welcome!