Zack Albert
@zalbert.bsky.social
200 followers 310 following 50 posts
Polisci prof. @ Brandeis U. Research on parties and polarization and elections. Glad there’s finally hockey here. Go Leafs Go!
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
zalbert.bsky.social
Probably not exactly what you’re after, but on voteview you can search by member name and see which ideological bin they fall into relative to party/chamber. My students had fun with it yesterday.
zalbert.bsky.social
Really cool feeling to open a box of your own book! For sale starting august 26.

www.pennpress.org/978151282802...
zalbert.bsky.social
I’m just a simple guy begging Google Docs to not log me out when I’m in the middle of typing a sentence
zalbert.bsky.social
Congrats! Well-deserved
zalbert.bsky.social
Could easily replace “academics” with “partisans” and explain a lot about politics
jayvanbavel.bsky.social
An analysis of ~100,000 academics finds that a small subset of academics generate majority of social media posts.

That vocal minority can skew how the public—and even journalists—infer “academic consensus,” potentially fueling false perceptions. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Political expression of academics on Twitter - Nature Human Behaviour
An analysis of nearly 100,000 academics on Twitter reveals strong progressive stances on climate and social issues, driven by a small, vocal subset. The study highlights potential gaps between academi...
www.nature.com
zalbert.bsky.social
Worth noting this is due mostly to people thinking he isn’t serious or disciplined enough to stick to one of his most sincere, central policy goals. Which is one of the many reasons these tariffs will only have negative effects
carlquintanilla.bsky.social
WASHINGTON (AP) - US consumer confidence rebounds in May after five straight months of declines due to anxiety over Trump tariffs.
zalbert.bsky.social
Very cool stuff! I find similar results when I look at more traditional forms of engagement (think tank hiring and event participant patterns) in my book. Love the idea of podcasts as data. Looking forward to seeing more!
zalbert.bsky.social
Really cool stuff. Love when there’s a paper to cite for something I’ve long thought to be true
zalbert.bsky.social
Love this idea. Any idea how to implement in R? Wasn’t able to find much with a quick look
zalbert.bsky.social
Need some parenting advice. My four year old has been rampaging through the house smashing things with a baseball bat. He finally agreed to pause for 90 days. My instinct is to lavishly praise him for his foresight and restraint. But what would you do?
zalbert.bsky.social
“No other president would’ve done it” is the truest thing he’s ever said
zalbert.bsky.social
I bounce back and forth (much like trump on tariffs) between “there is no plan” and “the plan is self-enrichment via market manipulation”. The truth is probably that trump is dumb and likes tariffs (no plan) + those around him see opportunities in that to make money
jefftiedrich.bsky.social
do I have this right? Donald Trump is just going to crash the world economy every three months — and then pretend to save it, over and over, while his cronies rake in untold billions on his shameless market manipulation, is that it? fucking hell
zalbert.bsky.social
I agree. But also worth noting that it’s actually a large shift in today’s political terrain
zalbert.bsky.social
I’m sure everyone will have a different favorite but “definition” really stands out to me
penamerica.bsky.social
A growing list of words and materials are being scrubbed from government websites and documents in an attempt by the Trump administration to remove all references not only to DEI, but also to climate change, vaccines, and a host of other topics.

More: pen.org/banned-words...
zalbert.bsky.social
Really interesting. Is there a paper associated with this?
zalbert.bsky.social
Don’t forget Willy!
zalbert.bsky.social
The obsession with tariffs actually makes a lot more sense if this was the ultimate goal
zalbert.bsky.social
Why can’t we have nice things (planned cap increases that don’t get derailed by pandemics or idiotic policies)?
Reposted by Zack Albert
Reposted by Zack Albert
taekulee.bsky.social
Political scientists: please consider signing, and sharing with other political scientists, this petition, which expresses urgent concerns about threats to the balance of powers in the U.S. today. Hundreds have already signed.
Political scientists' statement on recent events
Please use this form to add your signature to the following statement. Note that we are only soliciting signatures from individuals with PhDs in political science. We, the undersigned, are political ...
urldefense.proofpoint.com
Reposted by Zack Albert
aaronsojourner.org
The Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, a great org, asks individuals & orgs to sign their letter requesting Congress act to restore data that has been removed & ensure a similar purge does not reoccur.
#EconSky #PolicySky #sociology #PoliSky
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
zalbert.bsky.social
I should say I love working with pro editors and what they do is important. But we need to acknowledge an asymmetry here: while responsible outlets strive for objectivity, others are lying about "$50 million for Gaza condoms" and framing Trump's assault on the Constitution as a normal corrective
zalbert.bsky.social
One thing that came into clearer focus writing this is how the editorial norm of objectivity fits uneasily with this moment. Striving for objectivity is good! But in practice it leads to contrived statements that understate reality (e.g. "clearly illegal" -> "appear to be illegal according to...")