#antiZionist
antizionist Jews are antisemitic. no question
February 13, 2026 at 9:44 AM
Der Kampf der Berliner CDU gegen AS ist fadenscheinig und einseitig. Ist aber kein Grund, den antizionistischen Hetzer Bax zu verbreiten.
www.movementagainstantizionism.org
(Share Pics von Adam-Louis Klein x.com/adam_louis52...)
February 13, 2026 at 9:03 AM
Expose and dismantle the antizionist hate movement.
February 13, 2026 at 6:47 AM
you know this is my favorite (I FUCKING HATE IT WITH THE FIRE OF A THOUSAND SUNS) thing in Discourse Land right

"supporting a politician bc of her position on trans rights in America if she has ever said or done anything that could be possibly interpreted as not strictly antizionist is
February 13, 2026 at 5:25 AM
uh. he isn’t making sense. this is thinly veiled antisemitism, and not the passive/“i got too enthusiastic about being antizionist” kind
February 13, 2026 at 3:47 AM
When I responded to Daniels point "we HAVE to be in community with them to be 'observant'" with "then stop", Daniel pretend I was saying

[stop being jewish]

and not

[stop abetting genocide and join an explicitly antizionist community].
February 13, 2026 at 2:34 AM
Because he didn't want to support an antizionist.

I'm really not sure what part of this you're struggling with
February 13, 2026 at 2:13 AM
(And I say this as an antizionist Jew)
February 13, 2026 at 12:24 AM
it sucks! i wish nobody ever has to make that call! but as someone who made that call at great personal cost, sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do. i am to understand there's a healthy community of antizionist jews, even! it doesn't fix everything but it allows keeping one's jewish identity!
February 12, 2026 at 11:34 PM
Daniel seems to have quite a decent reputation among...a lot of folks. And I'm wondering if those claims and statements are antisemitic.

Does [erasing the authentic "jewish"-ness of antizionist Jews and Jewish orgs] count as "antisemitism"?
February 12, 2026 at 10:36 PM
Like I said, true! But we don't have to guess about what Zohran Mamdani means by it specifically because he's said so. Repeatedly and in no unclear terms. If you want to insist then he's not *really* an antizionist, ok. You don't have to call him one.
February 12, 2026 at 9:50 PM
Ok but we're in a world where Chuck Schumer feels he's a zionist and Zohran Mamdani feels he's an antizionist so we gotta accept that these terms still carry meaning after 1948
February 12, 2026 at 9:44 PM
For example, if someone is a zionist because they want Israel to exist, i.e. some state somewhere on earth where Jewish people have a right of migration, doesn't matter where, but someone else is an antizionist because they don't want Israel to exist, i.e. a state required to have a jewish majority
February 12, 2026 at 9:33 PM
Only if the antizionist and the zionist in discussion over it agree on the necessary and sufficient conditions for a state to be Israel
February 12, 2026 at 9:32 PM
Noting that people and institutions outside of israel support israel and people that call themselves leftist and antizionist will accuse you of spreading international jewry conspiracies
February 12, 2026 at 8:11 PM
I'm genuinely unsure what you're asking here. Is it possible that once Mamdani identified as an antizionist there wasn't anything he could say or do to get Schumer's endorsement, because Schumer would be too suspicious of his true intentions? Sure. But you're making my point then, not yours
February 12, 2026 at 7:48 PM
Right, so the question for anyone listening was "what kind of antizionist is he, and do I believe him when he says which kind he is, knowing that he's incentivized to say he's the right kind"
February 12, 2026 at 7:39 PM
This seems like it relies on an idea that Zohran Mamdani has changed his position. Like you said, he hasn't. He still identifies as an antizionist! He hasn't triangulated.
February 12, 2026 at 7:33 PM
This is what the replies section on every single FB post about Jews, or October 7th looks like. This post is just in the memory of a young woman murdered at the Nova Festival. I’ll add images of the comments in the thread.

This is what racist antizionist rhetoric inevitably invites.
February 12, 2026 at 7:16 PM
Neither are antizionist and antisemitic.
February 12, 2026 at 7:03 PM
The dude described himself as an antizionist. If you think concluding that he was antizionist is evidence of deep bias I don't know what to tell you
February 12, 2026 at 7:02 PM
This is true only in the sense that Chuck is too much of an ideological zionist to ever support any antizionist. But Schumer is very obviously prejudiced against muslims and arabs
"Chuck Schumer's refusal to support Mamdani was racist" is one of the stupidest fucking things I've ever heard - and that's a stiff fucking competition - because it requires you to believe "Schumer would have supported a white dude with Mandani's politics"
February 12, 2026 at 6:52 PM
x.com/HeidiBachram...
The first and only local politician to condemn the antizionist door knockers is
@peterkyle
who is an MP in Hove. He asked
@sussex_police
to investigate this under “hate crime and incitement laws”. Let’s see if the law can protect Jews.

www.jewishnews.co.uk/cabinet-mini...
February 12, 2026 at 6:51 PM
Like I said right at the start if there's an example of someone with those positions who he's gotten behind, I unreservedly apologize.

AOC maybe? After all she's never said she's an antizionist.
February 12, 2026 at 6:49 PM
I think that had Mamdani not identified himself as antizionist Chuck would have come to his views of Mamdani with different preconceptions, yes
February 12, 2026 at 6:43 PM