Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb
iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1...
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb
- the accounting of climate adaptation finance tends to exclude normal development finance for political reasons
-adaptation consists of my mostly private or locally public goods easy to fund, but impossible to measure
- mitigation is a global good but is mostly provided by private goods
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb
“Climate finance is a disaster.”
But the problem is not that there isn’t enough of it. It’s far worse than that. It’s that none of it makes sense, and we’ve designed it in a way that minimises its impact.
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb, Andrea Cattaneo, Jens Rommel
We look at this in the context of food - labels + price policies - & find they are *extremely* sub-additive.
Also, labels do way better than prices.
Paper: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
🧵
They also had fewer ER visits, nights spent in a hospital, and jail stays.
The report estimates that this reduction in public service use SAVED the city $589k.
www.businessinsider.com/denver-basic...
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb
Under $100bn goal, because MDB shareholders are developed + developing, only 71% of MDB climate finance counted.
Now all MDB climate finance counts. At current levels, this means $21 billion more counted towards NCQG per year
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb
www.cgdev.org/blog/aid-and...
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb
Reposted by: Adrien Vogt‐Schilb