Scholar

Ian Hussey

H-index: 19
Psychology 66%
Sociology 10%
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
Me: I cannot afford to take on a new side project.

Also me:
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
"We regret to inform you that your application for tenure has been denied."
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
It said 'data available upon request' but when I clicked the button nothing happens
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
Please someone help me figure out the rest of this joke

Reposted by: Ian Hussey

cghlewis.bsky.social
Issue 16 of RDM Weekly is out! 📬

It includes:
- Data is Not Available Upon Request @ianhussey.mmmdata.io
- AI Generated Participants in Social Science @jamiecummins.bsky.social @science.org
- Why’s it Hard to Teach Data Cleaning? @randyau.com
and more!

rdmweekly.substack.com/p/rdm-weekly...
RDM Weekly - Issue 016
A weekly roundup of Research Data Management resources.
rdmweekly.substack.com
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
“Something response, which could include antidepressant, natural improvement, regression to the mean, and others”
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
Let’s say that only some of this was satire.

bsky.app/profile/ianh...
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
Data is available upon request … but only in the form of one hundred non sequential 3.5” floppy disks containing a segmented zip file, inside of which are confusingly named files that can only be opened using the 1996 application StatView for Apple Mackintosh. Enclose a cashiers check for postage.
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
You raise a good point that research to date has focused on whether authors share data directly when contacted but not whether, if the don’t, that the journal will step in to try to uphold the policy when asked.
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
Kind of you, but my study was quite small. It does give more of a peek into authors’ wild responses than others, but the largest/best one out there is probably Tedersoo et al, which is really large scale and shows the same results.
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
In my experience, many journals don’t stand over their own policies either. I’ve had editors treat me as hostile for taking journal policy and authors statements seriously and asking for data promised.
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
The FDA announced that it would expand the use of leucovorin as “a promising treatment for symptoms of autism” citing 23 publications. Those 23 studies have a total N=46 with a specific genetic disorder, not for autism generally.

www.thetransmitter.org/spectrum/exc...
Exclusive: The 23 studies the FDA based its expanded leucovorin label on
The studies include 46 people, mostly toddlers, who have cerebral folate deficiency due to variants in a folate transporter.
www.thetransmitter.org
absolutely-not.bsky.social
i looked at the methodology for this and it is
a. sex addiction counseling group in texas did a surveymonkey and extrapolated the results to the entire us population which is the sort of research design that earns you an ff on an intro methods class (the extra f is for extra effort), and
b. p-hacked
the-independent.com
Nearly a third of Americans have had a ‘romantic relationship’ with an AI bot, new survey says
1 in 3 Americans have had a ‘romantic relationship’ with an AI bot, new survey says
www.independent.co.uk
richlucas.bsky.social
We already know that lagged effects in CLPMs are likely to be upwardly biased, but just how easy is it to find significant effects? Way too easy. I tested CLPMS in 100 randomly selected pairs of correlated variables and found significant effects in 98 of them. New preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
You seem to be doubling down on the idea that pointing out deep concerns about papers would be prevented on your platform. This is a very strange idea, you’re baking the conclusion in, undermining the process. As other pointed out, it immediately excludes sleuths who are expects in finding issues.

Reposted by: Ian Hussey

cchapman.bsky.social
Excellent 🧵 about LLM synthetic data (silicon samples etc) and why they don't solve any particular problem in human research.

FWIW, in addition to results and considerations like these, I've argued elsewhere that the entire question is ill-formed: quantuxblog.com/synthetic-su...
jamiecummins.bsky.social
@science.org just dropped a story covering this preprint! Check it out below, and thanks to @cathleenogrady.bsky.social for the great write-up! www.science.org/content/arti...
felixthoemmes.bsky.social
Excited to share that I’ll be the incoming Editor of AMPPS. My first priority is building a diverse team of Associate Editors and Editorial Board members. If you’re interested, DM me or add your name via this super simple survey.
cornell.ca1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_...
Please share!
Qualtrics Survey | Qualtrics Experience Management
The most powerful, simple and trusted way to gather experience data. Start your journey to experience management and try a free account today.
cornell.ca1.qualtrics.com
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
Send me your brilliant ideas and I’ll check.

Reposted by: Ian Hussey

malte.the100.ci
1. Perfection.

2. Joke's on you, @hadley.nz.

Me: Look, this is funny, Hadley Wickham like your joke about the Python film.

Her: Who's Hadley Wickham?

Me: A major R developer.

Her: And he liked your post?

Me: Yeah.

Her: Why? I also hate R.

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m