Jonathan Potter
Jonathan Potter is a British psychologist and Dean of the School of Communication and Information at Rutgers University. He is… more

www.nytimes.com/2025/09/25/o...
If we want universities to defend society against pseudoscience & conspiracy (ever more needed), they need sustained support rather than caricatured takedowns.
Lazy claims about squeamishness or bias obscure the real bind: govt frameworks + financial erosion + political hostility particularly from the right. That is what’s crippling UK universities.
It’s glib to sneer at “VR caves” or gender theory syllabi. The real crisis is a system trying to do more with less while navigating hostile policy & public misunderstanding.
by Jonathan Potter — Reposted by: John Drury
Staff precarity, casualisation, and burnout don’t come from “fashionable taboos.” They come from impossible workloads, insecure contracts, and too much compliance paperwork.
The gap has been filled by international students. Now govt policy in the form of visa restrictions, and hostile rhetoric is driving them away. This is financial self-sabotage.
Meanwhile central funding has been hollowed out. Domestic fees frozen since 2017 while costs rise steeply. Govt support shrinks year by year.
REF, TEF, KEF aren’t abstract acronyms. They tie every university to govt metrics: research outputs, teaching “excellence,” knowledge exchange. All policed, all audited. They are good and bad, but any serious criticism of universities in the UK needs to address their role.
by Jonathan Potter — Reposted by: John Drury
Marriott paints universities as indulgent, decadent, and squeamish. But the reality is very different: an over-regulated, underfunded system caught between REF, TEF, KEF, and shrinking resources.
Following on from my earlier thread about claims of “bias” in universities (link below 👇), I was struck by James Marriott’s column in today’s Times. It’s full of anecdote & caricature. The real story of UK universities is structural, financial, and political. 🧵
👉 bsky.app/profile/prof...
Reposted by: Jonathan Potter
Gergen argues that the desire for self-unity is ultimately mistaken.
#socsky #philsky
by John Drury — Reposted by: Jonathan Potter, Tim Bale, Maria Abreu , and 1 more Jonathan Potter, Tim Bale, Maria Abreu, John Drury
New from me in @theconversation.com, summarizing our recent work funded by @ukri.org & @behaviourresuk.bsky.social
theconversation.com/why-do-peopl...
Reposted by: Jonathan Potter
by Jonathan Potter — Reposted by: Alexa Hepburn
@alexahepburn.bsky.social
@alexahepburn.bsky.social
@darg-sessions.bsky.social
@rucalteam.bsky.social
#emotionography
I wrote a thread about it.
Reposted by: Jonathan Potter, Charlotte Taylor
www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-v...
They’re biased toward evidence. Toward facts.
Especially in the US, careless talk of “left-wing bias” invites real damage.
Thoughts from US/UK experience here: 👇
by Christina Pagel — Reposted by: Jonathan Potter
🗓️ Tuesday 13 May
⏰ 15:00 - 17:00 CEST
📍 Online: us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regi...
by Elizabeth Stokoe — Reposted by: Jonathan Potter
me on what AI is and isn't, and why we all have a democratic duty to do some myth busting before the dreaded management sci-fi comes to get us www.careful.industries/blog/2025-4-...
As I said:
It’s not surprising that being through higher education correlates with support for parties addressing inequality and diversity. It reflects informed engagement with the world, not partisan bias.