Scholar

Katherine Ognyanova

H-index: 23
Psychology 17%
Political science 17%
ognyanova.bsky.social
Video of our conversation at ICA's special anniversary session on Generative AI. Many thanks to @noshir.bsky.social for organizing! With @claesdevreese.bsky.social, @teachguz.bsky.social, Winson Peng, Yingdan Lu, and Jörg Matthes #GenerativeAI #LLM -- at @icahdq.bsky.social
ICA@75 ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL SESSION: Generative AI: Transforming Disrupting Communication Scho
YouTube video by ICA
www.youtube.com

Reposted by: Katherine Ognyanova

pnas.org
“If your work speaks to challenges that go beyond a single field, this is the place for it.” – Katherine Ognyanova, PNAS Nexus Reviewing Editor 🌍 @pnasnexus.org is open access & interdisciplinary, connecting rigorous research with broad audiences.

Publish with us: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/pa...
“If your work speaks to challenges that go beyond a single field, this is the place for it.” – Katherine Ognyanova, PNAS Nexus Reviewing Editor
Discover what members of the Editorial Board have to say about PNAS Nexus as an interdisciplinary journal.
katestarbird.bsky.social
Not going to argue against this. Certainly can't point the finger at one specific disinfo campaign & say, "this had an impact." But the long theory of disinformation is that it erodes the ability to know/trust information, which can lead to apathy towards democracy and a preference for autocracy.
mmasnick.bsky.social
I said on the podcast yesterday that I don't think "disinformation" had that big an impact on the election. What did was a huge portion of the populace just ignoring all news because there's just too much, and it's too much work to figure out what's legit. This seems to agree...
rodonnell.bsky.social
looking at some unweighted dfp data by how much attention voters pay to political news

-a great deal: harris +8
-a lot: harris +5
-a moderate amount: trump +1
-a little: trump +8
-none at all: trump +15
ognyanova.bsky.social
Yeah, I'm just watching OpenAI's newly released ChatGPT Agent power through my Qualtrics survey. I have thoughts about the future of human subject research.
ognyanova.bsky.social
New paper from our team, with @davidlazer.bsky.social @jonathanschulman.bsky.social @royperlis.bsky.social and other smart people who keep off social media.
pnasnexus.org
People were more likely to believe in conspiracy theories about the attempted assassination of President Trump if they heard them from people they knew than if they heard them on social media, according to a study. In PNAS Nexus: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
Belief in conspiracy theories about the assassination attempt against Donald Trump. Regressions include demographic controls for gender, age, race, education, income, parental status, geographic region, and urbanicity

Reposted by: Katherine Ognyanova

misinforeview.bsky.social
Now live: “Declining information quality under new platform governance” by Burak Özturan, Alexi Quintana-Mathé, Nir Grinberg, Katherine Ognyanova, and David Lazer. misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/decl...
pnasnexus.org
People were more likely to believe in conspiracy theories about the attempted assassination of President Trump if they heard them from people they knew than if they heard them on social media, according to a study. In PNAS Nexus: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
Belief in conspiracy theories about the assassination attempt against Donald Trump. Regressions include demographic controls for gender, age, race, education, income, parental status, geographic region, and urbanicity
joshuasweitz.bsky.social
Support for maintaining or increasing research support remains largely bipartisan. Which raises the question: what exactly is the WH and Congress doing here?

Source, CHIP50:
www.chip50.org/reports/amer...

Led by @ognyanova.bsky.social, @davidlazer.bsky.social, @royperlis.bsky.social + more.
Federal investment in Scientific + Medical Research by D, R, and Independent via CHIP50 - https://www.chip50.org/reports/american-attitudes-toward-government-interventions-in-science
ognyanova.bsky.social
Average approval of science-related government actions is highest among Republicans (42%), men (28%), graduate degree holders (30%), and high-income respondents (31%). Disapproval is strongest among Democrats (74%), African Americans (56%), women (53%), and those aged 65 and older (55%).
ognyanova.bsky.social
New CHIP50 report on public approval of government interventions in science -- funding cuts, mass layoffs, etc. On average, twice as many Americans disapprove of these actions as approve #science @aaas.org @science.org @sciam.bsky.social @icahdq.bsky.social @sciencenews.bsky.social
American Attitudes Toward Government Interventions in Science | The COVID States Project
Report #115
www.chip50.org
We just posted an interactive on changes in approval for Trump from right before he was inaugurated to the present. We have very large samples (30k), and the interactive allows you to look at changes within very small slices of the public.

www.chip50.org/blog/whose-a...
Whose approval/disapproval of Trump has shifted the most?
www.chip50.org

Reposted by: Katherine Ognyanova

claesdevreese.bsky.social
How does generative AI transform/ disrupt communication scholarship?

Happy to be part of this great #ica25 panel. With answers and many more questions

@noshir.bsky.social @teachguz.bsky.social @ognyanova.bsky.social and Peng, Lu, Matthes and 🙋
angelhwang.bsky.social
📣 Calling all #CHI2025 attendees who work with human participants: Join our panel discussion on #LLM, #simulation, #syntheticdata, and the future of human subjects research on Apr 30 (Wed), 2:10 - 3:40 PM (JP Time)

Post your questions for panelists here: forms.gle/m2mXY3xFafAX...

Reposted by: Katherine Ognyanova

shugars.bsky.social
LAST CHANCE for early registration to #WebSci25! Early reg closes TODAY, April 21!

We hope you'll join us at #Rutgers this May for this interdisciplinary conference!

Register at: www.websci25.org

cc:
@websciencetrust.bsky.social, @noshir.bsky.social

Reposted by: Katherine Ognyanova

uw-lsc.bsky.social
Next week, @rutgerscomminfo.bsky.social Associate Professor @ognyanova.bsky.social will be presenting on "False beliefs in unusual times: The role of trust, technology, and social ties" at LSC's #Scicomm Colloquium! #UWLSC700

Learn more at: lsc.wisc.edu/2025/01/17/l...
tedhchen.com
Reminder! CFP and workshop registration for the Political Networks and Computational Social Science Conference.

We have a great lineup of network analysis workshop instructors: @michaeltheaney.bsky.social, @ognyanova.bsky.social, Shahryar Minhas, & Cassie McMillan.

sites.google.com/view/confpol...
Poster for the 2025 Political Networks and Computational Social Science Conference. Workshop information for the PolNet-PaCSS conference.

The workshops will be August 11 and August 12, 2025. There are four sessions: Introduction to Network Analysis in R taught by Michael Heaney; Network Visualization with R taught by Katya Ognyanova; Introduction to Latent Variable Models for Networks taught by Shahryar Minhas; and Introduction to Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs) taught by Cassie McMillan.

More information: https://sites.google.com/view/confpolinetworks/political-networks-conference/2025-polnet-workshops
ognyanova.bsky.social
Friends, the 2025 ACM Web Science conference is coming up at #Rutgers this May. We have fantastic presenters and keynote speakers lined up. The schedule and registration just went live on www.websci25.org. Do come and join us! cc @websciencetrust.bsky.social @shugars.bsky.social
politicalnetworks.bsky.social
Join us for the 2025 Political Networks & Computational Social Science Conference (sites.google.com/view/confpol...), Aug 11-14 at Harvard & Northeastern, with Duncan Watts delivering the keynote. Workshops: Aug 11-12; panels: Aug 13-14. Submit by March 28:
forms.gle
ognyanova.bsky.social
New Jersey bookstore, but I'm sure they sell them online!
politicalnetworks.bsky.social
Save the date! PolNet & PaCSS 2025 are joining forces at Harvard and Northeastern on August 11–14, 2025—workshops on Aug 11–12, conference on Aug 13–14. Stay tuned for details on CFP, registration, and more. See you at #PolNetPaCSS2025!

Reposted by: Katherine Ognyanova

sciencenews.bsky.social
U.S. scientists are losing funding and even their jobs under the new Trump administration. Researchers gathering at the 2025 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science shared their fears and hopes for the future.
The mood is ‘uncertain, anxious’ at 2025’s first big U.S. science meeting
Scientists are losing funding and even their jobs under the new Trump administration. Researchers at the AAAS meeting shared fears and coping strategies.
bit.ly
ognyanova.bsky.social
Many of us have had a very rough few weeks. But I am told, in no uncertain terms, that nobody has suffered more than this good boy who had to endure a haircut today. #dogsky #dogsofbluesky
ognyanova.bsky.social
Trust in AI is highest among those with moderate knowledge (57%) but lower among those with very high or very low knowledge (38%).
Novices and experts are skeptical, while those with some knowledge might be overconfident. (🧵6 of 6)
ognyanova.bsky.social
We tested Americans on basic AI knowledge with 8 questions. The results:
- Only 23% answered more than half of the questions correctly.
- Less than 1% got all answers right.(🧵5 of 6)
ognyanova.bsky.social
While 62% of Americans trust news from journalists, 48% trust AI-generated content. (🧵4 of 6)

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m