Scholar

Matti Vuorre

Videos
H-index: 20
Psychology 44%
Neuroscience 13%
more

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Based on the available information it appears that the points on p.3 apply to any preprint, not just pci:rr. I don't know if Wiley has responded to this yet.
1. Authors post their manuscript on a preprint server and then immediately submit to a Wiley journal. After each round of peer review they update the version of the preprint simultaneously with submitting their revised manuscript to the journal – a common practice in many fields. The latest version of the preprint is therefore identical to the version that is under consideration by the journal. Where the article is eventually accepted by the journal, the final version of the preprint is materially identical to the accepted version of the manuscript. 2. An editor of a Wiley journal writes an editorial (or other un-reviewed piece such as a Comment) and posts it on a preprint server prior to submitting it to the journal. The article is immediately accepted without any changes, therefore the article published by the Wiley journal is identical to the preprinted version of the article. 3. Authors post their manuscript on a preprint server and submit to a Wiley journal where it undergoes in-depth peer review. The reviews are very positive, requiring only a single minor correction to fix a typographic error. The original preprint is therefore materially identical to the accepted and published version.
2

Reposted by: Matti Vuorre

singmann.bsky.social
I remember reading a blog post somewhat recently on here arguing that for open science practices every effort counts. So we should not expect every paper to fulfil all open science criteria immediately but researcher should start by making their data open, then their code, etc. Anyone has a link?
1 1 3

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
bsky.app/profile/pci-...
pci-regreports.bsky.social
Peer Community in Registered Reports @pci-regreports.bsky.social · Jun 17
NEW: Statement from the PCI RR Managing Board on the withdrawal of Infant and Child Development as a PCI RR-friendly journal, and the decision by Wiley to refuse preprints that have been peer-reviewed by @peercommunityin.bsky.social / @pci-regreports.bsky.social

Read here ➡️ osf.io/tn8mh
In 2024, Infant and Child Development (ICD) withdrew as a PCI RR-friendly journal and reneged on three Stage 1 recommendations issued by PCI RR. In addition, Wiley – the publisher of ICD – notified PCI RR and the PCI core team of its decision to withdraw all Wiley journals from PCI and PCI RR, including an additional 9 PCI-friendly journals. Finally, Wiley appears to have banned all of its ~1600 journals from considering submissions that have been previously reviewed by PCI or PCI RR. This statement explains the history of ICD joining PCI RR and developments that led to the current outcome. The PCI RR Managing Board believes that this shift in policy to become “PCI-hostile” renders Wiley journals incompatible not only with community-based preprint review but with preprint archiving in general.
1 2

Reposted by: Matti Vuorre

bxjaeger.bsky.social
🐶Now out at JNB🐶

We examine the prevalence and psychological correlates of lay beliefs in physiognomy - the idea that a person's character is reflected in their facial appearance.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
1 3 6

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Yup, that's exactly it.
1

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Bibliography formatting: the real reason it takes ten years of higher ed to get a PhD.
2

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Strong endorsement for typst: typst.app/universe/pac...
1 3

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
I think that's a partial eta squared right? It's used a lot in anova but kinda tricky when you have non-controlled covariates (ES inflates with your covariates). Would probably avoid along with other standardized "effect sizes".
5

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Yeah, very interesting thanks. Great to see that you've included these per-stimulus plots in the paper too!
1 1

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
What's the tab-autocomplete-index for kruschke? Gelman? (Look forward to reading this.)
1

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Ive always listened to a lot of internet radio (somafm.com/player24/sta... is legendary) but we also recently bought a physical radio and are loving it. Random ads? Check. No choice over music? Check. This actually makes it less distracting ime
2

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
This is absolutely why I've been feeling better about myself lately. I always ask "extremely important" and "insightful" questions, and my answers frequently "nail it 💯".
steverathje.bsky.social
Steve Rathje @steverathje.bsky.social · 6d
🚨 New preprint 🚨

Across 3 experiments (n = 3,285), we found that interacting with sycophantic (or overly agreeable) AI chatbots entrenched attitudes and led to inflated self-perceptions.

Yet, people preferred sycophantic chatbots and viewed them as unbiased!

osf.io/preprints/ps...

Thread 🧵
Abstract and results summary
1 3

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
It does look better but is still extremely slow and has inappropriately low information density. Hoping for these to improve. We consistently get ~10kb/s download speeds which is not fun for large data.

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
And yes this comment absolutely made before reading the paper, but curious if it's something you thought about here too.
1 1

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Super cool, thanks for sharing. I remember thinking about something related; is it possible that the pattern reflects some kind of missingness? In the top panel, it might just be really hard to get stimuli that elicit ratings for the top left and bottom right corners?
1 1

Reposted by: Matti Vuorre, Lisa W. Fazio, Will Jennings , and 3 more

steverathje.bsky.social
🚨 New preprint 🚨

Across 3 experiments (n = 3,285), we found that interacting with sycophantic (or overly agreeable) AI chatbots entrenched attitudes and led to inflated self-perceptions.

Yet, people preferred sycophantic chatbots and viewed them as unbiased!

osf.io/preprints/ps...

Thread 🧵
Abstract and results summary
3 83 160

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Reviewing papers
an elderly woman is reading a piece of paper with the words `` what is happening ? '' below her .
ALT: an elderly woman is reading a piece of paper with the words `` what is happening ? '' below her .
media.tenor.com
1

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
This is great. I really like how well tinytable works across different formats.
2

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
It's the lme4::sleepstudy dataset!
3

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Any reasoned discussion on this would be outcome/topic/study-specific. We once set these limits based on a d required to subjectively feel a difference in Y, but even that relies on iffy assumptions about measurement invariance.
2

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
I think functions that calculate ropes/equivalence tests, and the like, should not set defaults but instead error out with "results completely depend on this argument, user input based on theory required".
2

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
It's completely arbitrary (variously defended by appeals to Cohen, empirics, or numerology.) Sadly the cult of standardized "effect sizes" serves only to reinforce the faulty idea that we can have general benchmarks like this. I argue that .1 is even worse than 0, at least the latter delineates +/-.
1 3

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Oh cool I didn't know about those. My tables are too boring for any styling...

by Matti Vuorre — Reposted by: Magnus Johansson

matti.vuorre.com
100% this, especially with Wiley given their anti-preprint stance.
francescopoli.bsky.social
Francesco Poli @francescopoli.bsky.social · 12d
Why are we still sending our work to Wiley and other publishing companies so that they can profit from it? There's so many better options now, for example: psychopen.eu/journals/
1 5 13

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
I looked under the hood and, just as I suspected, it's a tinytable!
1 1

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Love the table, thanks for sharing!
1 1

Reposted by: Matti Vuorre

francescopoli.bsky.social
Why are we still sending our work to Wiley and other publishing companies so that they can profit from it? There's so many better options now, for example: psychopen.eu/journals/
3 10

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Congrats @emilyanntowner.bsky.social 🎉

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
Me too. I guess we could just write more short comments on psyarxiv.
2

by Matti Vuorre

matti.vuorre.com
This should have been the second link fightchatcontrol.eu

🤦
Fight Chat Control - Protect Digital Privacy in the EU
Learn about the EU Chat Control proposal and contact your representatives to protect digital privacy and encryption.
fightchatcontrol.eu

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m