Scholar

Richard R. John

Richard Rodda John, Jr. is an American historian who specializes in the history of business, technology, communications, and the state.… more

H-index: 19
Political science 29%
Engineering 17%
rrjohnr.bsky.social
Annals of Anti-Monopoly: I will be in DC on 25 September to give a talk at George Mason University. The public is invited. Teaser: why was George Washington furious at the reactionary politics of his fellow Virginian George Mason? Was Washington on to something? Is it time to…cancel George Mason?

Reposted by: Richard R. John

leev.bsky.social
One of my favorite historians of business and technology, @rrjohnr.bsky.social, is now on here. You should follow him, especially for deep takes on the history of US anti-monopoly thinking. And also Post Office history. So Post Office history.

Reposted by: Richard R. John

epopppp.bsky.social
Every time I see George Stigler credited with inventing the concept of regulatory capture I want to write a letter to the editor.

Reposted by: Richard R. John

leev.bsky.social
Beth, I got @rrjohnr.bsky.social to join just for this conversation! LOL.

Richard is working on a history of American anti-monopoly thinking. I was wondering if he'd bumped into any antecedents for regulatory capture theory.

Reposted by: Richard R. John

benwaterhouse.bsky.social
Richard-- do you have a sense of the etymology of the actual term 'regulatory capture' (as opposed to the concept, which as you say goes way back)? I always thought Huntington coined it in the Marasmus of the ICC article and Stigler cribbed it. But maybe I misremember.

Reposted by: Richard R. John

dmgreene.bsky.social
Got any interesting critical engagement (review or not) with Stein's Running Steel/Pivotal Decade duology?

Reposted by: Richard R. John

benwaterhouse.bsky.social
Whatever you have to say, Richard, you can say in front of the entire class.

Reposted by: Richard R. John

benwaterhouse.bsky.social
Here's a place to start. I cut the end date off at 1980 because the term goes bonkers after that-- if you set the parameter to 2019, you can't even see the little blips in the 19th c. and early 20th c.
Google N gram of term "regulatory capture" showing slight upticks around 1840, 1900, and 1920, before major takeoff in late 1970s

Reposted by: Richard R. John

leev.bsky.social
@rrjohnr.bsky.social is claiming the idea goes all the way back to the founding of the nation if not before. But here I think we'd need to be VERY careful thinking about definitions and conceptual analysis.

Reposted by: Richard R. John

leev.bsky.social
No. That's not what I'm saying. It's no doubt true that many of these ideas go back even earlier than the US Founding, for example. But we also need to attend to what new elements came in later and also how specific contexts shaped things. I'm all for "This is old as hell."

Reposted by: Richard R. John

sethcotlar.bsky.social
Question, esp. for historians who teach at places with PhD programs. Is it ok for prospective grad students to get in touch with professors they're interested in working with? Back in the Coolidge administration when I was applying I did this, but I'm not sure it's still acceptable practice.

Reposted by: Richard R. John

drewkadel.bsky.social
I realize that I need to learn more, in depth about J.P. Morgan. Are there any good recent studies of him? Trying to locate his religion in the context of his politics, business & cultural activities-but I'd rather find out more about the last 3. @kevinmkruse.bsky.social @thetattooedprof.bsky.social

Reposted by: Richard R. John

washingtonpost.com
Internet speeds have come a long way since the days of the dial-up modem, but sometimes you can’t beat the millennia-old method of carrier pigeon.

At certain data volumes and distances, the pigeon is a quicker option for large swaths of rural America.
Pigeons are still (sometimes) faster than your internet
Internet speeds have come a long way since the days of the dial-up modem, but sometimes you can’t beat the millennia-old method of carrier pigeon.
www.washingtonpost.com

Reposted by: Richard R. John

patrickmccray.bsky.social
There's much to be gained from revisiting the nexus of religion and technology; David Noble surveyed some of the territory but there's much much more.

Reposted by: Richard R. John

bencarp.bsky.social
People who teach (history or similar) in PhD-granting departments: how many student committees (orals, dissertation proposal, or dissertation) do you typically sit in a year?

Reposted by: Richard R. John

rrjohnr.bsky.social
Rachel Sheldon’s fine new coauthored essay in the _JAH_ is helping 19th c. US historians to move beyond the “party period” synthesis (championed among others by my mentor David Donald). Party competition for Donald helped to promote unity (along with faith in the Constitution and popular oratory).
rachelshelden.bsky.social
🗃️ 2) Some of the most exciting work on the 19th c is in the history of statebuilding, incl by @gauthamrao.bsky.social @rrjohnr.bsky.social @arielron.bsky.social, that often fit awkwardly w/ the party system model. A new understanding of 19th c parties opens up ways to rethink that relationship 6/
rrjohnr.bsky.social
Annals of anti-monopoly: Here is my review (critical yet appreciative) of Dan Schiller’s monumental history of 20th c. U.S. telecommunications policy — forty years in the making. Schiller is particularly suggestive on the FCC in the 1930s, a neglected topic, and on the efficacy of consent decrees.
Crossed Wires: The Conflicted History of U.S. Telecommunications, from the Post Office to the Internet. By Dan Schiller
How should we write the history of communications? In Crossed Wires, Dan Schiller provides us with one answer to this question. In a sprawling, often perce
academic.oup.com
rrjohnr.bsky.social
Announcing an open search for a position in Columbia’s Ph. D. program in communications

“We are particularly interested in candidates pursuing pioneering research agendas in:  Science, Technology, and Society (STS); media law and policy; media history; global media….”

apply.interfolio.com/162364
Apply - Interfolio {{$ctrl.$state.data.pageTitle}} - Apply - Interfolio
apply.interfolio.com
rrjohnr.bsky.social
Annals of anti-monopoly: “…the safer course…decentralization of power, [but] the uniform power to regulate these enterprises [eg railroads], if they partake in the least of a monopoly character, must be equally extensive with the territory they occupy.” Sterne, _Constitutional History_ (1882).
rrjohnr.bsky.social
Annals of anti-monopoly: historian Shane Hamilton explains how shifts in the U.S. food distribution networks led to the blocked Kroger-Albertsons merger.
rrjohnr.bsky.social
Annals of anti-monopoly:

“Plutocracy is its own kind of dictatorship. When companies larger, wealthier and more powerful than most world governments threaten individual liberty with coercive private taxation and regulation, it threatens our way of life."

Jonathan Kanter, antitrust head. DOJ, 2024
rrjohnr.bsky.social
Thanks! Ellsworth’s son was patent commissioner in the 1830s. He backed Samuel Morse’s telegraph patent against British rivals. Morse fell in love with his daughter Anne and later covered the story up. Anne’s mother gave us the Biblical quote “What Hath God Wrought” that Dan Howe used as his title.
rrjohnr.bsky.social
Agreed! Trust all is well in “the other place” — and the real world! :)
rrjohnr.bsky.social
The Kennedy assassination was the first historical event I remembered as well. My mother crying in front of the radio; the horses on TV during the funeral

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m