Aida
@aidap.bsky.social
690 followers 420 following 1.9K posts
Your local angry transmom and a proud Bristolian Sometimes AoS and BA player. Stats suspended until trans people get their human rights. https://www.instagram.com/aidaa.paul/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
aidap.bsky.social
Palette cleanser time, a romantic moment of two happily in love lesbians kissing.
Two women kissing with london eye in the background
aidap.bsky.social
Women confe... Not that woman.
aidap.bsky.social
It was hilarious though, and they picked the most trans of all bristol cafe's to "brainstorm" :D
aidap.bsky.social
It's also incorrect, terfs many times attempted to disrupt rallies/prides etc, the issue was that after planning at nearby cafe (shoutout to cafe kino in bristol which they used, which hosts trans meetsup) they realized that with 3-5 people they cannot do jack shit.
aidap.bsky.social
Trans CHILD's phone.
aidap.bsky.social
Happy closer to turning into compost!
aidap.bsky.social
Only when it fits them.
aidap.bsky.social
Because it's bullshit to get them in power without having to commit to anything. It's really not that complicated.
aidap.bsky.social
Oh right, because that's how life works, transphobes and sexist pigs suddenly just "stfu" and behave.

You can argue with my blocklist.
aidap.bsky.social
"Sit down" - Adnan to fellow female MP as an "argument".

You are unwarranted, get some basic facts in.
aidap.bsky.social
He is the Rest of what happens if you strip humanity of a person.
aidap.bsky.social
Oh right, letting someone define what is and isn't a female trait, peak feminism. Go back to the kitchen.
Reposted by Aida
bashback.bsky.social
BREAKING: BASH BACK TARGET FiLiA ANTI-TRANS CONFERENCE

The conference, whose alumni include J.K. Rowling, this year hosts hate groups LGBAlliance and Transgender Trend, along with the director of Scottish Lesbians, one of the groups responsible for April's segregationist Supreme Court ruling.
aidap.bsky.social
It's a moving goal post is what it is, and I'll leave you be with it.
aidap.bsky.social
You really are skipping big parts of history, there were many tussles with the police, and in the BBC it was invasion, with physical fight with security officers and broadcasters.

Sorry, you are using sanitised version of the past to try to pass judgment today. This is not ok.
aidap.bsky.social
What?

There was TONS of direct action involved in repelling S28, without which there would be no talk of trans rights, goodwin and so on. It is as important part of that narrative as the peaceful one.

Lets stick to the actual history, not forget the police clashes in 88 and 89. Or 88 BBC invasion
aidap.bsky.social
And it was never planned to be so, it was injustice that boiled over and people reacted in the only way that was left for them. There was no some big strategy there, just angry people who were no longer giving enough of a shit and acted.
aidap.bsky.social
Excuse to do what that they are not already doing exactly?
Removal of rights and complete narrative control as if trans people are happy about it.

And even more importantly, one side of cause does not critique the other, we don't need infighting. Can just move on and leave the others be.
aidap.bsky.social
First pride was a riot, and every movement that in the end won rights for any minority included use of violence, whether we like it or not.

It wasn't the only part of it, ever, but when civilized way is ignored, bashing some windows can get people to at least start paying attention.
aidap.bsky.social
When peaceful protest of over 100k+ gets ZERO response of coverage, but bashing few windows gets PM and multiple other people upstairs at least acknowledge the problem - it's progress.

When people continue to have their rights stripped, and peaceful means fail, direct acts come next. Simple.
aidap.bsky.social
Except the Hodge podgd excuse of a judge is now giving speeches how it is supposed to be supplied broadly.

It's not just Keith.
Reposted by Aida
reactiveashley.bsky.social
When the Supreme Court can act as if trans people never had rights, retroactively redefine “sex” in the 1974, 1975, and 2010 Acts of Parliament, and somehow deem criminal law to incorporate that by reference, who even needs to persuade the legislature to pass laws criminalising trans people?
Reposted by Aida
hleehurley.com
"I didn't describe my genitals accurately before I gave him a blow job"
"jail for you"

This is the UK.
aidap.bsky.social
They just stop needing to be extremely disproportionally and fraudulently platformed like they are now.
Reposted by Aida
adamfare1996.bsky.social
If you listen to "Gender Critical" folk, apparently no women can ever be predatory, violent, or harmful.

They're a safeguarding nightmare tbh... And their rhetoric puts so many (especially children) in danger.