3. A lot of the audience seemed to be guys who didn’t want to sleep with lots of women, they just wanted a normal relationship with one girl, but hand no clue at all how to go about that.
Seemed like the confluence of good advice, bad shit and socially inept guys was the real problem.
It’s just PUA misogynistic bullshit by another name right?
If you’re presenting yourself fraudulently to someone, that’s already *really* bad, but I’d also wager than basically anyone who does this isn’t actually emotionally prepared to have a relationship, and has an immature view of what one is.
this is sociopathic behaviour and I think we need to treat it as such! just because something has become easy to do doesn't mean it has become less creepy, or more acceptable!
The editors of the national media organisations are like shit Yodas: size does not matter.
If they decide that your particular campaign doesn’t fit the current narrative you won’t be getting any media attention and you won’t be shifting the agenda, no matter the size of your protest.
C.f. The blanket coverage of “asylum hotel protests” in the UK - where national media organisations reported protests with as few as a dozen people, making them to drive the political agenda, yet regularly ignore protests with 10s or even 100s of thousands of protesters.
Turns out protest alone was never what changed things, it was protest *plus media coverage of protests*, which prompted officials to respond to protests, which increased public awareness of protests, etc.
If the protest happens & corporate media simply ignores it ... it's inert.
Six out of eight of the largest mass-movement protests in US history have happened since 2017. You wouldn't know this from most media reporting, and you sure af wouldn't know this from the way either major party has reacted.
This is written like it was just fortuitous that this particular judge was assigned to the Coskun case co-sponsored by Toby's FSU.... Like the judgment was solely at the judge's discretion.
No, the judgment was rooted in English Law with a heavy nod to the ECHR.
The one positive here seems to be that maybe this means the government is finally making some sort of effort to shift the narrative away from immigration.
