Toby Buckle
@polphilpod.bsky.social
15K followers 1.9K following 4.7K posts
Host of the Political Philosophy Podcast & occasional writer. US & UK politics, philosophy, religion, & the odd food pics.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
polphilpod.bsky.social
gotta hand it to the . . . *checks notes* catholic church
polphilpod.bsky.social
this is the energy we need
richraho.bsky.social
Chicago priest Fr. Larry Dowling describes procession to ICE facility: “No one had the courage to speak directly to us. No one from Homeland Security could stand in the presence of the Monstrance holding the Blessed Sacrament. No wonder. Evil is repelled, recoils in the presence of Christ.”
polphilpod.bsky.social
it seems like the median score for a national dem, with i think a fairly generous model (again, i'm not 2nd guessing public statements, as long as they're consistent), is a C

so, yeah, room to improve

& seems like party leadership is worse than rank & file
polphilpod.bsky.social
maybe, although it does weight that quiet heavily, it's 1 of 7 & wouldn't have made that much of a difference here

- trippling it (3 of 10) maybe gets van hollen up to a B, it would boost some lower level dems, but from the main ones . . .there's less to speak of
polphilpod.bsky.social
i agree that does seem to leave a bit of a gap. on the other hand, i'm trying to create a measure that's as objective as possible - it's not just my read of someone
polphilpod.bsky.social
i'm reasonably explicit about this, i take into account statements, actions, votes, but not "do we buy that the person is sincere?"

bsky.app/profile/polp...
polphilpod.bsky.social
a few provisos (this will be the 'method' thread, i'll do another for the results)

- i'm just going by public statements & actions, i'm not trying to judge if someone means it in their heart of hearts
Reposted by Toby Buckle
polphilpod.bsky.social
christ, i shudder to think what a UK version of this would show
polphilpod.bsky.social
i made a model to assign scores for how robustly US politicians oppose fascism & graded 13 leading dems

criteria & method QTed, individual results in 🧵 below:
Reposted by Toby Buckle
polphilpod.bsky.social
i made a model to assign scores for how robustly US politicians oppose fascism & graded 13 leading dems

criteria & method QTed, individual results in 🧵 below:
polphilpod.bsky.social
I want something that poses an equivalent "difficulty" to the US one - ie demands active opposition, but is by no means unrealistic
polphilpod.bsky.social
keep in mind, what we're trying to get at is how actively they oppose global fascism, not issue agreement *as such*

so like even 'pro trans rights' i'm using as a proxy for how far they think this can be appeased
polphilpod.bsky.social
you know what? i'm gonna do this (tomorrow)

give me feedback on what the (UK) criteria should be - some (pro trans, calling it fascism) will directly port, others (court reform) won't

bsky.app/profile/polp...
polphilpod.bsky.social
i want a "resistance ranking" for dems that grades them on how seriously they're taking this

something like support for:

1. prosecuting gop criminality
2. court reform
3. procedural agressiveness
4. end ICE
5. trans rights
6. calling this fascism

+ points for having taken personal risks
polphilpod.bsky.social
maybe something for tomorrow
polphilpod.bsky.social
the fact that i don't want to & it feels like the results will be very grim indeed is maybe a reason to do it
polphilpod.bsky.social
you'd obviously have to regig the criteria a bit & run if for all the centre-left party leaders, not just labour
polphilpod.bsky.social
christ, i shudder to think what a UK version of this would show
polphilpod.bsky.social
i made a model to assign scores for how robustly US politicians oppose fascism & graded 13 leading dems

criteria & method QTed, individual results in 🧵 below:
Reposted by Toby Buckle
iid.bsky.social
This is a fantastic idea, I’ve been thinking for ages we need our own way to call out “DINOs” constructively instead of just indulging in this endless cynicism about all Dems
polphilpod.bsky.social
i made a model to assign scores for how robustly US politicians oppose fascism & graded 13 leading dems

criteria & method QTed, individual results in 🧵 below:
Reposted by Toby Buckle
1t2ls.bsky.social
i really like this concept.
i think one of the things that could save the democratic party is cohering around a clear shortlist of promises and priorities. this is a step toward that.
polphilpod.bsky.social
i made a model to assign scores for how robustly US politicians oppose fascism & graded 13 leading dems

criteria & method QTed, individual results in 🧵 below:
polphilpod.bsky.social
in general the only sane answer to "why should i listen to you!?" is . . . idk, maybe don't if i get on your nerves?
polphilpod.bsky.social
like, you might still think i know nothing about it - god knows plenty of people who've worked in politics don't

but i don't think the standing concern really hits - american dad, american wife, lived the majority of my adult life there
polphilpod.bsky.social
"you're british, why should i listen to you about US politics?"

well, i'm a dual national who's lived in both & spent over a decade working in us electoral politics & progressive activism
Reposted by Toby Buckle
stevesawyer12.bsky.social
This 🧵 is interesting, and TBH, quite disappointing. Toby’s criteria, if anything, represents a fairly low bar. But it reinforces my gut-level impression that we have VERY few politicians who are meeting the needs of this moment.
polphilpod.bsky.social
i made a model to assign scores for how robustly US politicians oppose fascism & graded 13 leading dems

criteria & method QTed, individual results in 🧵 below:
polphilpod.bsky.social
pritzker got a 5 in that for saying that, you'd need to be more explicit to go higher "X broke Y law and should be arrested" or actively use the powers you have to prosecute
polphilpod.bsky.social
well, that was my morning

if that was interesting, give it a share

bsky.app/profile/polp...
polphilpod.bsky.social
i made a model to assign scores for how robustly US politicians oppose fascism & graded 13 leading dems

criteria & method QTed, individual results in 🧵 below: