🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
416sunshine.bsky.social
🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
@416sunshine.bsky.social
Happy introvert - presents as an extrovert. Terrified about 2nd Trump term! 2 incredible kids & 2 parents with dementia. Trying to keep my sanity, find patience & grace. Just keep smiling & laughing #dementiaSucks #SunshineHeals 🚫 DMs unless you’re Mar🐪
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
Just because everyone assumed this is what Bondi would do with the Epstein files isn’t a reason to not raise holy hell about it.
December 20, 2025 at 8:34 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
@ms.now

The Fat Ass Felon had this photo removed from the criminal obstruction of justice DOJ-OOJ website. So…
December 20, 2025 at 6:11 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
This image (File 468 in the Epstein records), showing Donald Trump, was part of the DOJ’s Friday release and has since vanished from the agency’s website. Funny how that works. Someone must have missed that redaction, oops.
December 20, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
The fact that random people on the Internet are outsmarting Trump's DOJ in detecting the removal of Epstein Files shows just how amateurish Pamela Jo Bondi and her D-list team are.

There are competent coverups and sloppy, easily detected coverups. This is the latter.
December 20, 2025 at 11:33 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
There is no basis to withhold these images under the clear terms of the Epstein Files Transparency Act. None.
WOW: The DOJ has DELETED an image from its release of the Epstein files that shows photos of Trump in a drawer.

Yesterday, we noted that this image — file 468 — likely slipped through the cracks while officials were attempting to hide materials pertaining to Trump.

Now, it’s gone.
December 20, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
Yesterday we were all waiting in the Epstein line. Today, the entire country has turned into investigators, tracking which files are disappearing. Sixteen gone so far. There’s been a remarkable amount of teamwork, with people working together to identify the missing documents.
December 20, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
This photo has been removed from the DOJ Epstein webpage.

By whom? For whom?
December 20, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
December 20, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
BREAKING: At least 16 files from the Epstein release disappeared from DOJ's webpage, including a photo of Trump, with no explanation.
At least 16 files have disappeared from the DOJ webpage for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein
The Justice Department’s webpage for documents related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is missing at least 16 of its files a day after they were released.
bit.ly
December 20, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
DOJ destroyed its own plan. It released documents & images involving Bill Clinton while he is under investigation - an investigation Bondi ordered herself. You can’t invoke an open probe to justify redactions after disclosing information related to that investigation. That defense is finished.
December 20, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
I don’t think the law passed by Congress said that DOJ has to release less than 1% of the materials by Dec 19.
December 20, 2025 at 11:52 AM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
“The most transparent administration in history” only released 10% of the Epstein files yesterday.

The DOJ must be confusing transparency with cover-up.
December 20, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
So true! #KindnessMatters #SelfWorth #ProudlyWoke 🫂☃️✨🥹🫂🎄🤶🏻🍀
December 20, 2025 at 11:54 AM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
Forcing the AG to publicly defend every redaction, line-by-line, would be a fun exercise.
Schiff: "I think we ought to bring Pam Bondi before the Senate Judiciary Committee demand answers as to why the DOJ has violated the law."
December 20, 2025 at 4:46 AM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
FLASHBACK… Seems relevant today…
December 20, 2025 at 4:31 AM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Beyond parody.

We have an attorney general who is covering up the Epstein Files and a President who is proud he could identify a giraffe
December 20, 2025 at 5:07 AM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
An attorney general who hides evidence to protect the powerful forfeits the right to hold office.

She should resign or be removed.
December 20, 2025 at 3:27 AM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
I guess Epstein isn’t in the Epstein files.
December 19, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
Yeah I'm SUPER shocked the DOJ is violating the law and not releasing all the Epstein files. WHO COULD HAVE GUESSED they'd continue to protect pedophiles??

Everyone. Everyone guessed.
December 19, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
LOL THE SEARCH FUNCTION WORKS GREAT!
December 19, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
RO KHANNA - “Let me be very clear, we need a full release. Anyone who tampers [with] documents, or conceals documents, or engages in excessive redaction will be prosecuted because of obstruction of justice.

www.thedailybeast.com/pam-bondi-ge...
Pam Bondi Gets Jail Time Warning Over Epstein Files Cover-Up
Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna threatened the attorney general directly.
www.thedailybeast.com
December 19, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
Jack Smith has requested that Jim Jordan release the entire video of his 8-hour closed-door testimony which he gave this week to the House Judiciary Committee.

Will Jordan release the video to the public?

If not, why not?
December 19, 2025 at 2:51 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
WOW: Fox News reports that the DOJ used the same redaction standards for “politically exposed individuals and government officials” as it did for victims.
December 19, 2025 at 11:28 PM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
🚨 BREAKING: I obtained the letter the DOJ sent to Congress about today's Epstein files release. NOW IT ALL MAKES SENSE! The law requires 5 exceptions. They're using 8. Here's what they're hiding and why it matters.
December 20, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Reposted by 🦋Sunshine & sarcasm ☀️💙
Khanna: "The law clearly required all unclassified information being released today. They obviously have not complied with that law. They claim it's because it was only a few weeks -- well they've known about this for months."
December 19, 2025 at 9:14 PM