Andrea Bradford, Ph.D.
@abradfordphd.bsky.social
230 followers 230 following 74 posts
Health psychologist in the Texas Medical Center. Interested in behavioral medicine, health services research, and patient safety. Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. Views are my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Andrea Bradford, Ph.D.
okazu.yuricon.com
Bookshop is having an Anti-Amazon sale, with cheap e-books and free shipping for print today and tomorrow:

bookshop.org/lists/ebook-...
Reposted by Andrea Bradford, Ph.D.
charlottegarden.bsky.social
A lot of states have taken steps to chill academic freedom - but they’ve mostly couched their “reforms” as “anti-indoctrination.” TX seems to be taking the next step: simply banning ideas it dislikes.
utaustinaaup.bsky.social
And now the UT System is auditing all courses for “gender ideology.” We haven’t been told what that even means.
utaustinaaup.bsky.social
A thread on the illegality of the Texas Tech president’s letter banning reference to more than two genders. We saw a similar confusion of EO’s with law and a similar overriding of free speech and academic freedom in the Texas A@M case.
abradfordphd.bsky.social
Journal editors make controversial and sometimes regrettable calls. No one is perfect. If the goal is "open review," the reviewers' critiques should be transparent, regardless of whether the reviewers are identified. Identifying the reviewers without this context seems a bit cowardly.
jacasiegel.bsky.social
Just had a novel experience reviewing. I recommended rejection for fundamental issues (e.g., underpowered, testing hypotheses well-established in the lit). I wasn’t given the chance to review again, & it was accepted. I will be listed online as a reviewer, but my name will not reflect my evaluation.
abradfordphd.bsky.social
I would also feel uncomfortable in this situation. I'd much rather see de-identified reviewer comments than reviewers' names, if given the choice. If "openness" is really the goal, it is important to make the process transparent.
abradfordphd.bsky.social
Remember playing the telephone game? It’s like that but at scale.
abradfordphd.bsky.social
No.
jamiecummins.bsky.social
Can large language models stand in for human participants?
Many social scientists seem to think so, and are already using "silicon samples" in research.

One problem: depending on the analytic decisions made, you can basically get these samples to show any effect you want.

THREAD 🧵
The threat of analytic flexibility in using large language models to simulate human data: A call to attention
Social scientists are now using large language models to create "silicon samples" - synthetic datasets intended to stand in for human respondents, aimed at revolutionising human subjects research. How...
arxiv.org
abradfordphd.bsky.social
One thing I miss about Editorial Manager was the ability to make private notes on reviewer profiles to discreetly warn other editors (and remind oneself). That, and the ability to edit reviewer reports if and when they really crossed the line.

www.nature.com/articles/d41...
‘Lipstick on a pig’: how to fight back against a peer-review bully
Scientific societies, journals, editors and researchers are pushing back against mean-spirited peer reviews.
www.nature.com
Reposted by Andrea Bradford, Ph.D.
jacasiegel.bsky.social
Deeply obsessed with this chaotically-written manuscript, featuring Simpsons references, punctuation such as “???”, and a final thoughts section that simply reads: “There is no need to summarize key points in a 2,000-word manuscript. Screw Flanders.”
Size Does Matter and Shorter is Better: It’s Time to Shorten Our Papers - William G. Obenauer, 2025
In The Simpsons episode “Guess Who’s Coming to Criticize Dinner” (S11E3), Homer becomes a food critic and is tasked with writing reviews for the local paper. It...
journals.sagepub.com
abradfordphd.bsky.social
Another day, another AI-generated journal article submission.

✅ Review that is not systematic and describes no methodology
✅ Near epic in scope
✅ Grammatically correct phrases that impart conspicuously little information
✅ Numbered headings
✅ Plenty of dashes
✅ Neat-as-a-pin reference list
abradfordphd.bsky.social
This sounds like the D.A.R.E. approach to genAI
Reposted by Andrea Bradford, Ph.D.
iosyislam.bsky.social
If you're in #iopsych in #Healthcare please consider participating in this study!
abradfordphd.bsky.social
That is a really cool way to celebrate! Happy birthday!!
Reposted by Andrea Bradford, Ph.D.
kstanton.bsky.social
APA call for editorial fellowships, including for Psychological Assessment. Please checkout Psych Assessment if you have interests in clinical assessment, measure development, psychometrics, or related areas!

www.apa.org/pubs/journal...
www.apa.org
abradfordphd.bsky.social
In fairness, the side effects of processed foods are fairly well established by this point, whereas the news cycle updates almost every week with new ways that GLP-1s can harm you.
Reposted by Andrea Bradford, Ph.D.
brian-goldstone.bsky.social
A Labor Day reminder: today there isn't a single city, metro area, or state in the U.S. where a full-time minimum-wage worker can afford a modest 2-bedroom apartment.

Millions of people with jobs—even multiple jobs—aren't safe from homelessness in this country.
Opinion | America Is Pushing Its Workers Into Homelessness
www.nytimes.com
abradfordphd.bsky.social
Authors typically transfer the copyright to the publisher by way of a written agreement. Work for hire is not the issue here.
abradfordphd.bsky.social
Most of my papers are in there but I'm not sure I'm the copyright holder on any of them!
abradfordphd.bsky.social
Often the copyright belongs to the publisher of the academic journal. There are several exceptions, however.
Reposted by Andrea Bradford, Ph.D.
science.org
"The day the paper was published should have been a moment of pride. Instead, it felt like a quiet erasure." #ScienceWorkingLife https://scim.ag/4p3eH5g
An illustration of a man falling out of a piece of paper, with text that says: How an academic betrayal led me to change my authorship practices.
abradfordphd.bsky.social
This is a brilliant explainer on anti-vaccine junk science laundered through peer-reviewed journals. Many of the same tactics appear in other dubious scientific papers.
meganranney.bsky.social
A must-read, must-share piece - clearly deconstructing the shoddy science of the Geiers (who are inexplicably in charge of studies at HHS).

Consider this an early warning for what lies ahead. 🛟🩺🧪

www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
Opinion | The Playbook Used to ‘Prove’ Vaccines Cause Autism (Gift Article)
Data can easily be manipulated to show a causation that doesn’t exist.
www.nytimes.com