Adam Muraski
@adammuraski.bsky.social
520 followers 590 following 4.8K posts
it’s all fun and games until someone loses an ecosystem https://www.instagram.com/adam_muraski/?fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAaamKjMUMJ872H-2nvo0BOSffrSpRwuG0JkiZt6_5RbDTnMIHKHUY1Aqp3c_aem_9jNevIUZQeHYSIkr0uKfzw
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
adammuraski.bsky.social
Getting really tired being told I have to choose between the Borg and the Daleks.
adammuraski.bsky.social
Commercial AI really does seem to exist outside of any real market feedback at all.
Reposted by Adam Muraski
joanwestenberg.com
PSA:

Pointing out that something is a social construct has never once changed anyone's behavior about that thing
adammuraski.bsky.social
I think it’s fair to say that we are either on the precipice of no longer practicing market theory at all, or have already plunged off the cliff. I think this is what Marx really meant by the term ‘capitalism.’ But you know, we’ve been here before, so I don’t really go for that ‘late stage’ theory.
adammuraski.bsky.social
I was raised on the idea that a market represented a system which included negative feedback, a poor product meant poor sales which meant you had to stop selling it or go under. But from my viewpoint, it really looks like enough wealth has been consolidated to overcome any negative feedback.
adammuraski.bsky.social
I was raised on the idea that a market represented a system which included negative feedback, a poor product meant poor sales which meant you had to stop selling it or go under. But from my viewpoint, it really looks like enough wealth has been consolidated to overcome any negative feedback.
adammuraski.bsky.social
Owning almost everything isn’t enough or satisfying for these people. They need ownership to mean they can literally just lift a finger and punch a button and some automated system will do everything. This is all just for vanity.
adammuraski.bsky.social
Which wing is that? The people shouting genocide Joe and refusing to vote for Harris? Are we sure those folks are actually a wing of the Democratic Party? Because they seem like just a bunch of crazy people, not terrorists, and certainly not dyed in the wool Dems.
atrupar.com
Emmer: "This is about one thing and one thing alone -- to score political points with the terrorist wing of their party, which is set to hold a hate America rally in DC next week."
adammuraski.bsky.social
But of course, the automobile industry wasn’t launched by private equity, which amounts to a massive slush fund. It was started by people that needed that investment to pan out, otherwise they’d go under. So the cars generally worked as described.
adammuraski.bsky.social
If at the dawn of the automobile industry 95% of cars had constant maintenance problems to the point that it would have been easier for people to just keep using horses, we’d still be using horses today.
adammuraski.bsky.social
I have to circle back to this, 95% is a big number so I imagine many (probably most) of these companies are also backed by private equity. It’s entirely a bubble. As I said before, many business no longer exist to offer products or services, but to run these experiments for investment firms.
rbreich.bsky.social
AI companies are spending billions on deals with each other, which boost their value.

This has helped twenty billionaires tied to AI add $450B to their fortunes in 2025.

Meanwhile, an MIT study found that 95% of companies using AI haven't seen returns on investment.

Be warned.
adammuraski.bsky.social
I have to circle back to this, 95% is a big number so I imagine many (probably most) of these companies are also backed by private equity. It’s entirely a bubble. As I said before, many business no longer exist to offer products or services, but to run these experiments for investment firms.
rbreich.bsky.social
AI companies are spending billions on deals with each other, which boost their value.

This has helped twenty billionaires tied to AI add $450B to their fortunes in 2025.

Meanwhile, an MIT study found that 95% of companies using AI haven't seen returns on investment.

Be warned.
Reposted by Adam Muraski
costasamaras.com
Picture how big the Hoover Dam is. An absolute unit. The Hoover Dam has a power capacity of 2 gigawatts (GW).

The solar farm that the Admin just cancelled could have produces 6.2 GW of power. That's more than 3 Hoover Dams.
jael.bsky.social
SCOOP: The Bureau of Land Management says the largest solar project in Nevada — the Esmeralda 7 mega-farm — has been canceled

The news was quietly dropped via a sudden website update with no public word from any of the companies involved or a statement from the agency

@heatmap.news
Esmeralda 7 Solar Project Has Been Canceled, BLM Says
It would have delivered a gargantuan 6.2 gigawatts of power.
heatmap.news
Reposted by Adam Muraski
rbreich.bsky.social
AI companies are spending billions on deals with each other, which boost their value.

This has helped twenty billionaires tied to AI add $450B to their fortunes in 2025.

Meanwhile, an MIT study found that 95% of companies using AI haven't seen returns on investment.

Be warned.
adammuraski.bsky.social
Thanks to our friend Chomsky, I learned that libertarian is a term invented by socialists, fun fact! Also yes, I agree with Plato, tyranny and slavery are symptoms of too much liberty concentrated among only a few. Liberalism isn’t perfect, nothing is, but I’d take liberals over communists any day.
fuzzymike.bsky.social
lmao liberals are doing "actually the defeat of slavery was due to libertarians" now
Reposted by Adam Muraski
xinicit.bsky.social
Everyone can have a little crash out as a treat
adammuraski.bsky.social
The communists were obviously very high among the concerns of the founders.
oldheadsz.bsky.social
Free speech is when you suspect the communist will win an election if it is held fairly, so you prod your puppets in that state to refuse to hold an election and start a massive war killing as many peasants and workers as possible. See Vietnam Elections Geneva-Accord.
adammuraski.bsky.social
You understand that the original conception was that ethnicity and religion were both just insidious structures, or no?
adammuraski.bsky.social
To be fair, most of today’s progressivism is from those eras.
adammuraski.bsky.social
People generally seem to think progressives first became a thing in the 1970s, or even 90s.
adammuraski.bsky.social
People generally seem to think progressives first became a thing in the 1970s, or even 90s.
Reposted by Adam Muraski
lisamikolajczyk.bsky.social
So they announced the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize winners? And let me guess, a certain dementia addled orange colored turd didn’t make the list? Shocking.
Someone should let him know they don’t generally award it to leaders who declare war on the citizens of their own countries.
adammuraski.bsky.social
If anything, progressivism was a reaction to liberalism. Progressives never did a civil rights movement, but it would have been far more consistent with progressivism than leftism or even liberalism. Leftists don’t really concern themselves at all with civil rights, instead focusing only on ‘class.’
adammuraski.bsky.social
There was an actual progressive movement that spread across both the US and UK. The progressive movement gave birth to the labor movement which won standards such as the 40hr work week, weekends and paid vacation. When FDR brought leftism to America, leftist made a project of usurping progressivism.
adept2u.bsky.social
People started calling themselves progressive because they were too cowardly to face the criticism of being a liberal.
adammuraski.bsky.social
Another crazed narcissist projecting on bsky.
bitdizzy.bsky.social
don’t you feel a little disgusting about how your smarm relies on the inability of the dead to testify to their abuse? are you the kind of person who believes that abuse doesn’t exist if the abused don’t speak up about it? people like you are the reason why murder and rape are political institutions
adammuraski.bsky.social
I knew you were leftist nutbag when I started. The poor USSR and its expansion project was of course AkTuAlLy ’liberation.’
nerdjpg.com
Did liberals care about free speech when they killed 20 million people around the world during the Cold War. Was that free speech pilled
adammuraski.bsky.social
I’m afraid that the hundreds of years of philosophical debate that ended up deciding free speech was the best of nothing but poor to bad options must be something you are not aware of. So who is exactly living under a rock here?
adammuraski.bsky.social
This message brought to you by the legally protected right to free speech, which was conceived and put into place by liberals.
nerdjpg.com
Liberal politicians aren’t betraying you they are agents of fascism

If you believe they are your allies you will get fucked