Alt WASO NPS
@altwasonps.bsky.social
45K followers 140 following 320 posts
#AltNPS Unofficial Washington D.C. Office #Resistance Team. Protect & preserve the US from fascism #AltGov #WeAreAltGov I study everything and know nothing.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
altwasonps.bsky.social
It began with a defiant, and now infamous, tweet from Badlands, because of Trump's intentional disregard for science. Soon after, the #AltNPS and #AltGov was formed, most standing in unity with Badlands.

That's why we are here, since the beginning, and we aren't going anywhere.
altwasonps.bsky.social
CDC, EPA, DOE, HUD, HHS, DHS, IRS

Anticipating more over the next hours/days.
altwasonps.bsky.social
Have confirmed reports from individuals at multiple Agencies that RIF notices have been/ are being sent out.
altwasonps.bsky.social
All of this recent Tylenol shit has made one thing clear... Antivacs don't want answers, they want their position validated.

And apparently not even the puppet that they instilled can do that.
altwasonps.bsky.social
Guys, I've noticed this really weird trend. Like everyone who drinks water, and I mean everyone...

They have all eventually died.

I think we should look into this and stop drinking water.
altwasonps.bsky.social
Interesting.. it's almost like people shouldn't be murdered based on the perception of a group of people
altwasonps.bsky.social
Ok.. and how does this align/not align with what I've said.
altwasonps.bsky.social
Ok.. then can you explain why you are saying there are two conversations?
altwasonps.bsky.social
I'm not going to click on random links that someone sent me. If you have a thought to express.. say it
altwasonps.bsky.social
Maybe re-read what we have been talking about...
altwasonps.bsky.social
There is only one conversation...
altwasonps.bsky.social
Okay let's think about it what's worse Not existing or existing with the face repercussions of actions
altwasonps.bsky.social
Are you saying that most people should be killed or that society should be able to decide like not understanding and I'm trying I'm trying to try to understand what it is that you're saying or saying that you're disagreeing with but I'm not understanding it
altwasonps.bsky.social
Some fairly certain that I said not only do I think that a single person but also society shouldn't be able to decide whether someone lives or dies.. and you're saying that right now society is saying that homeless people should be killed and that you disagree with me so I'm legitimately confused
altwasonps.bsky.social
It shouldn't be allowed or accepted. Because and for better or worse once you accept that you begin to allow such severe penalty for lesser things or less proven things for disputable instances. And again to be frank that is why in all circumstances I am against capital punishment the death penalty
altwasonps.bsky.social
A small group of individuals should have the right to decide that. And it becomes not a matter of whether it's true or false or indisputable or not it becomes a fact of what's acceptable in society. And as much as I would really really like to just take a chainsaw to a bunch of m************
altwasonps.bsky.social
But there may also be cases where it is disputable. And so as much as I would want to murder who I thought the responsible individual was I don't think it would be right to. And I don't think that I should singularly have the right to decide that. And I also don't think that
altwasonps.bsky.social
To be very blunt what I mean is that if I knew for a fact that someone did something like that to my kid I would absolutely murder them.. But I also know that there is a chance that I could be biased or misinformed or that the truth could be skewed.. and there may be cases where it's indisputable...
altwasonps.bsky.social
Hence why no singular person should be able or have the right to decide
altwasonps.bsky.social
Not that I don't think people deserve it, some do.. it's more that so many have been deprived of life based on happenstance.. that I can't support that decision making (regardless of whether I want or believe it)
altwasonps.bsky.social
But it can get much more complicated from there. So yes, remove them from society.. but at the same time unless you can be 100% and indisputably sure.. no death.

And it's ..
altwasonps.bsky.social
My position on this particular matter is simple.. rape isn't cool. Rapists should be removed from society. And (forgive the language) subjects of rape should not be forced to bear undesired results.

If it was up to me, rapists would receive reciprocate punishment via chainsaw.
altwasonps.bsky.social
I'm not against incarceration or life sentences.

I am against capital punishment and deprivement of life. Whether that be by the state or an individual.

And yes, I do think some crimes deserve as much, but also no.. I would not support it.
altwasonps.bsky.social
Of how correct I might be, or how incorrect they might be.. it does not give me the right or ability to singularly decide if the should continue to exist.

And in my opinion, neither does society, as it, as a whole, can be influenced by a few.. regardless of right or wrong, good or bad.
altwasonps.bsky.social
You don't solve that through violence.

It may create an inflection point, but it won't dissuade those who agree. In fact, it will likely reinforce their position.

And to be honest.. there are quite a few people in the world that I wish didn't exist.. but they do. And regardless..