Beau Baumann 🍎
banner
beaubaumann.bsky.social
Beau Baumann 🍎
@beaubaumann.bsky.social
Yale Law PhD candidate. Admin law/legislation/separation of powers/immigration. Article I extremist.

. . . Also, vintage menswear enthusiast . . .
Pinned
Getting our walk on
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
Cool Aziz Rana project incoming 🛬🛬🛬🛬
Days of Complicity • EQUATOR
A legal scholar’s diary of Trump’s return to power
www.equator.org
January 20, 2026 at 11:12 AM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
LPE post here gets a firm grip around ICE and the threat is poses.
Immigration Agencies Are Openly Defying Federal Courts
Federal courts have overwhelmingly rejected the Trump Administration's radical expansion of mandatory detention. Despite this, ICE continues to arrest and detain tens of thousands of people each month...
lpeproject.org
January 20, 2026 at 11:21 AM
LPE post here gets a firm grip around ICE and the threat is poses.
Immigration Agencies Are Openly Defying Federal Courts
Federal courts have overwhelmingly rejected the Trump Administration's radical expansion of mandatory detention. Despite this, ICE continues to arrest and detain tens of thousands of people each month...
lpeproject.org
January 20, 2026 at 11:21 AM
Cool Aziz Rana project incoming 🛬🛬🛬🛬
Days of Complicity • EQUATOR
A legal scholar’s diary of Trump’s return to power
www.equator.org
January 20, 2026 at 11:12 AM
I recently felt like the turd in the punchbowl at a dinner of lefty types. I expressed a well of empathy for Usha Vance. That’s unpopular right now. But if you’re in an interracial marriage, you get the necessary trust involved. And you get the Lovecraftiab horror of the betrayal we’re witnessing.
January 19, 2026 at 3:12 PM
Me, three weeks in, still on social media.
January 19, 2026 at 2:36 PM
Second hospital visit of the year in the books. This one was a little alarming. Initial diagnosis was from a young doctor who thought I had something that only affects small children. When the attending came by, I walked through it with her, and she was just covered in a lot of embarrassment.
January 19, 2026 at 2:03 PM
This is good. Another post about how the Ct is hostile to legislators. I would just note this is a long term dynamic that, if fully appreciated, problematizes the author’s reform proposals. It would take a cataclysm to break the Ct’s psyche on this front.
"Expanding candidate standing while continuing to restrict legislative standing appears to be yet another data point for the current Court’s inclination to limit legislative power especially when it’s being invoked in an attempt to rein in the executive branch."

New "One First" on #SCOTUS in Bost:
203. Legislative Standing and/After Bost
The theory on which five justices concluded that candidates for office have standing to challenge election rules is difficult—at best—to reconcile with the Court's hostility to legislative standing.
www.stevevladeck.com
January 19, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Coverage of the National Constitution Center leadership fiasco is just making Luttig seem like more and more of a psycho. I really lament the role this guy has in team rule of law.
Leadership Dispute Said to Spur Abrupt Exit at the National Constitution Center
www.nytimes.com
January 18, 2026 at 6:53 PM
An opportunistic Congress slowly coming to life as it smells blood in the water. @joshchafetz.bsky.social
Congress Is Spurning Many of Trump’s Proposed Spending Cuts
www.nytimes.com
January 16, 2026 at 4:26 PM
A lot of what’s happening in Venezuela is just over learning Iraq by dumb dumbs who can’t do nuance. Like no distinction for these people between

1.) don’t dismantle the entire military and disenfranchise completely the old guard; and

2.) just keep the punishing dictatorship in place.
C.I.A. Director Meets With Venezuela’s Interim President in Caracas
www.nytimes.com
January 16, 2026 at 1:36 PM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
the fact that these lurid scenarios somehow treat trump as the only actor and do not contemplate the response of state and local officials, law enforcement, activists and others is a sign that they are less a hard-nosed analysis and more an expression of fear and anxiety.
January 16, 2026 at 12:32 PM
Me in 2019: “courts can’t save us”

Me in 2026: “courts are actively destroying American democracy”
This is a thought terminating cliche, not the least because no one is saying that they will "save us."
January 15, 2026 at 11:16 PM
I pine for a simpler politics rooted in a clear plan for addressing the yearly struggle against January overcrowding in gyms across America.
January 15, 2026 at 3:26 PM
Not entirely implausible to me that the admin’s offensive use of cyber will be more consequential than its deployment of special forces.
Cyberattack in Venezuela Demonstrated Precision of U.S. Capabilities
www.nytimes.com
January 15, 2026 at 12:58 PM
Uttered an audible “uh-oh” four words into the title
January 15, 2026 at 12:37 PM
I don’t agree w/ Ilan Wurman on much. But I will say he has two correct things to say here

(1) the idea of agency ~independence~ has proven pretty unhelpful

(2) there is no meaningful way in which the Fed is just doctrinally ~different~
The President's Removal Power: A Discussion with Professor Ilan Wurman
YouTube video by Touro Law Center
youtu.be
January 15, 2026 at 1:20 AM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
Just discovered that one of my articles was published! In it, I argue that judicial power has multiple components or dimensions, one of which is ideational. In other words, ideas and norms about courts’ proper role empower them over and above the traditional formal sources of power. Check it out!
The Ideational Dimension of Judicial Power
The judiciary dominates contemporary American politics. In the United States, courts have overcome their humble origins to act as central figures in nearly every major policy dispute and separation of...
scholarship.law.marquette.edu
January 14, 2026 at 11:28 PM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
Important and insightful 🧵
over the course of 1871, congress held seven months of hearings on ku klux klan and other white vigilante violence in the south, they took detailed testimony from hundreds of black men and women attesting to klan terror. (1/?)
January 14, 2026 at 1:07 PM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
over the course of 1871, congress held seven months of hearings on ku klux klan and other white vigilante violence in the south, they took detailed testimony from hundreds of black men and women attesting to klan terror. (1/?)
January 14, 2026 at 2:06 AM
I just don’t think bill clinton should be touching any cause worth carrying about right now, tbh.
January 13, 2026 at 8:16 PM
Shocked I say!
January 13, 2026 at 7:00 PM
Another domino falls in UET land!
More major originalist movement against presidential removal power:

Mike Rappaport, prominent originalist unitary theorist, admirably updated his views:
Article II does not imply a removal power.
He makes a case for presidential policy control instead.
blog.dividedargument.com/p/guest-post...
Guest Post: The Unitary Executive: Presidential Control, not Removal
a guest post from Professor Michael B. Rappaport
blog.dividedargument.com
January 13, 2026 at 5:29 PM
Reposted by Beau Baumann 🍎
Hamm's Biography of Arthur Garfield Hays
Richard F Hamm has published Confronting Racism: Arthur Garfield Hays and the Fight for Equality, 1925-1954 (SUNY Press): Beginning in 1925 the corporate lawyer and civil libertarian Arthur Garfield Hays began battling segregation. This book details Hays's work on the Mayor's Commission that investigated the1935 Harlem riot; his role in a 1937 restrictive covenant case in Westchester, County; his representing a challenger to the segregated draft in World War II; his part in ending the exclusion of African Americans from the American Bar Association; and his opposition to strong fair employment legislation. Motivated by his conception of a good society that valued civil liberties, democracy, and individualism, Hays fought for African Americans' legal rights under the Constitution. His activism was limited by his conservative economic views and his fear of an active state that intervened in private matters. His career illuminates the potential and perils of interracial co-operation during the long civil rights movement. Because the issues he confronted continue today-police mistreatment of African Americans, housing discrimination, limits on African Americans in the professions, racial discrimination in the military, and how to build government structures to limit discrimination-this book speaks to our time as well as his.  --Dan Ernst 
dlvr.it
January 13, 2026 at 8:03 AM