Author | Lightnews

CHA0SHACKER

@cha0shacker.bsky.social

36 followers 20 following 900 posts

30 | probably autistic | weird mixture between tech, games, politics, nsfw stuff and shit-posting

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

Yeah, check that before a transplant.

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

Did you ever try to OC the core?

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

This is the card btw

1 2

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

And i still wish i had a Rage Fury Pro with better memory

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

And now my 98 SE system has decided the registry was broken and set me back a few days of setup. How nice. At this point im just going to wait for the new board

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

Yeah 250MHz the card should at least be capable of. As i said, mine is already slightly over the 3.6ns (275MHz) threshold

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

Yeah i had luck. My past models were 5ns and 4ns as well and the cores never made 290MHz

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

Not bad for a super spoofed up Radeon DDR

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

Its my fourth 7500, finally got one with good memory and a good core. Already did 290/230 OOTB. Memory is 3.6ns

2 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

And that clock on the 7500 is not maxed out. I just wanted slightly faster clocks than the fastest Nvidia MX cards

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

Damn, i wonder if i could get half that scores with my Rage Fury Pro on a faster CPU than my K6

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 5h

Driver 4.2, OS is Windows Me, single 512MB DIMM of DDR-266 running CL2-2-2-5.
Board is theretroweb.com/motherboards...

The 7500 is running at 306/286

Gigabyte GA-7DXR+

Gigabyte GA-7DXR+ is a motherboard based on the AMD 760 chipset. Get specs, BIOS, documentation and more!

theretroweb.com

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 6h

And before anyone asks, yes i kinda exclusively ended up using AMD ATI combinations

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 6h

Another two years of tech advance gives us these scores

2 2

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 10h

Interesting, i can do a quick test on my systems to see if anything is different.

Reposted by CHA0SHACKER

John Linneman @dark1x.bsky.social · 13h

Working on an Unreal video - when using modern renderers, has anyone managed to achieve the current sky color? It’s always wrong compared to the original 3DFX renderer.

11 14 150

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 10h

Do you mean on a modern system? Or a period correct system using either the OpenGL or Direct3D render?

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 1d

This time is a K5 with an ATI Rage Pro. 800x600 runs a lot worse than 640x480 apparently

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 1d

You basically just explained why i tend to avoid third party patches ^^

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 1d

Well thats a third party patch, not a Windows update

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 2d

So that nobody can claim that installation of all the updates until late 2006 reduces performance

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 2d

Oh and im running on a fully updated Windows 98 SE

1 1

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 2d

Its btw also the last driver to support all the cards features if you look back at the ATI site in 2001 on the wayback machine. It only got two releases afterwards

CHA0SHACKER @cha0shacker.bsky.social · 2d

Damn, thanks for the comparison.

I picked the best driver i could find (6292) and it runs at 125/143

2 1