Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

LightNews

David Luque

@davluque.bsky.social

57 followers 69 following 38 posts

Experimental study of habits and goal-directed actions. Málaga, Spain. https://davluque.wordpress.com/

davluque.wordpress.com

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Reposted by David Luque

European Research Council (ERC) @erc.europa.eu · 13d

📣The 2026 ERC Consolidator Grant competition is now open! 📣

Already preparing your proposal? Info links ⬇️

Info for applicants 👉 buff.ly/PSbeUxX

Application portal 👉 buff.ly/mauZoqo

Deadline: 13/01/26

General info on #ERCCoG 👉 buff.ly/KCN6GTh

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 13h

El lunes no te dejan depositar

Reposted by David Luque

Laura Lopez @ohdearz.bsky.social · 2d

Valuable info about the Physics Nobel Prize today from Prof. Joseph Barranco at SFSU on Martinis and Devoret being a grad student and postdoc in Clarke's lab at UC Berkeley & Clark and Devoret being immigrants. "California *public* education made this happen. Immigration made this happen." ⚛️

Joseph Barranco posted on social media: Go Bears! Nobel Prize in Physics goes to 3 physicists studying mesoscopic quantum phenomena... Work was done in the 1980s in UC Berkeley Professor John Clarke's lab with his graduate student John Martinis and postdoctoral fellow Michel Devoret... all 3 share the Nobel Prize. Must also point out that both Clarke and Devoret are immigrants from the UK and France, respectively. All 3 are pioneers in the race to build the most powerful quantum supercomputers. California *public* education made this happen. Immigration made this happen.

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 2d

That's one reason why I like preregistration so much

Reposted by David Luque

Mark Haselgrove @markhaselgrove.bsky.social · 2d

Am slowly making my way through this paper. And it is an impressive body of work by a collection of great researchers.

However, I have a couple of problems with it...

1/n

PsyArXivBot @psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 8d

Benchmarks for Associative Learning Models: https://osf.io/qsgz8

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 5d

It was an excellent representation of current approaches to habit research

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 5d

And I talked about how habits persist over time

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 5d

Marta Miquel about habits, cocaine and the cerebellum

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 5d

Pilar Flores talked about electrophysiological markers for flexibility

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 5d

Paula Banca presented work about habits, automaticity and their relationship with OCD

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 5d

The symposium on habits at the International Spanish Comparative Psychology Society has been fantastic. Thanks to the organisers, the audience and of course the speakers. Here it follows what each talk was about:

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 7d

The authors could have been saved a lot of time and effort just asking Gonzalo @gurcelay.bsky.social 🤣

Reposted by David Luque

Mark Haselgrove @markhaselgrove.bsky.social · 8d

In which 94 benchmark phenomena are identified.

16 are domain- and species-general and should be explained by any theory claiming generality.

30 are species- and/or domain-specific but highly robust across procedures

PsyArXivBot @psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 8d

Benchmarks for Associative Learning Models: https://osf.io/qsgz8

Reposted by David Luque

Laura Bradfield (she/her) @bradfield-neuro.bsky.social · 11d

rdcu.be/eIyQB

Now published in Neuropsychopharmacology, here we mimicked the striatal neuroinflammation seen in the brains of individuals with compulsive disorders and found that this facilitated goal-directed action, whereas activating the Gi pathway in astrocytes prevented it

Dorsomedial striatal neuroinflammation causes excessive goal-directed action control by disrupting astrocyte function

Neuropsychopharmacology - Dorsomedial striatal neuroinflammation causes excessive goal-directed action control by disrupting astrocyte function

Reposted by David Luque

Tom Beesley @tombeesley.bsky.social · 15d

Academics with standard R&T contracts, how many journal article reviews do you do in a typical year, and how long do you spend on the average review?

David Luque @davluque.bsky.social · 13d

From 10 to 20. One morning each. It is hard to write in a foreign language

Reposted by David Luque

European Society for Cognitive Psychology @escop.bsky.social · 15d

Call for papers on conflict adaptation across single- and multi-tasking paradigms in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition

The deadline for initial submissions is 1 October 2026.

Reposted by David Luque

Prof. Amanda Wise @amandawise.bsky.social · 20d

1/At Macquarie Uni we are losing 50% of our units in my faculty. This is on top of cuts in 2020. We estimate by next year my faculty will be teaching 80% fewer subjects than pre Covid. Disciplines being cut do not have declining enrolments. @jennaprice.bsky.social @michaelwestbiz.bsky.social

Reposted by David Luque

Mike Le Pelley @mikelepelley.bsky.social · 21d

I often see papers using GPower for power analysis in repeated measures factorial ANOVA designs. I don’t know what it’s doing, but it’s definitely giving wrong answers: substantially underestimates required sample size. MorePower seems like a much better alternative github.com/LewisPeacock...

GitHub - LewisPeacockLab/MorePower: Installer for MorePower 6.0 (windows)

Installer for MorePower 6.0 (windows). Contribute to LewisPeacockLab/MorePower development by creating an account on GitHub.

Reposted by David Luque

Francisco Garre-Frutos @frangfr.bsky.social · 27d

Does facilitation by irrelevant distractors reflect suppression or controlled attentional capture? By reanalyzing prior work using the perceptual load paradigm, we find evidence for the latter!

If you are interested, check out the latest version of our preprint 👇

doi.org/10.31234/osf...

Reposted by David Luque

Francisco Garre-Frutos @frangfr.bsky.social · 24d

While measuring habits in humans experimentally is hard, on Bluesky it’s much easier: just count your “save omission errors” (the number of times you forget you can now save posts).

Reposted by David Luque

Oded Rechavi @odedrechavi.bsky.social · 29d

Full professor complaining to an assistant professor on how hard it is to get funding nowadays

Reposted by David Luque

Fernando Blanco 🦋 🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ @fernandoblancopsy.com · 29d

Postdoctoral job offer:

Do you want to join us to conduct research on the psychology of dis(mis)information in Granada, Spain? You will also have the opportunity to participate in popularization activities.

📆Apply before Sept 26th!

#socialpsyc
#cogpsyc
#PsychSciSky
#polipsy

Fernando Blanco 🦋 🏳️‍🌈 🏳️‍⚧️ @fernandoblancopsy.com · 29d

Do you work on the psychology of disinformation?
The CIMCYC (UGR), a María de Maeztu Unit of Excellence, is hiring a Postdoctoral Researcher.

📍 Granada, Spain
📅 Apply: Sept 15–26, 2025
🧑‍🔬 Postdoc (1 yr, renewable)

Please share!

#SocialPsychology #PsychScience

cimcyc.ugr.es/en/informati...

Job Offer: Postdoctoral Researcher in Disinformation

As part of the strategic plan linked to the María de Maeztu Seal of Excellence award, the CIMCYC is recruiting a postdoctoral researcher with experience in the field of the psychology of disinformatio...

Reposted by David Luque

LaurenGuillette.bsky.social @laurenguillette.bsky.social · Jun 12

New research paper #PsynomLB 'Extinction of outcome-specific Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT), instrumental outcome devaluation, and reward-related attentional capture are predicted by affect-driven impulsivity' https://bit.ly/43Rc3FL @Psychonomic_Soc @CanalUGR #Pavlov

Extinction of outcome-specific Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT), instrumental outcome devaluation, and reward-related attentional capture are predicted by affect-driven impulsivity

Learning & Behavior - In two online experiments, we aimed to study the relationship between emotion dysregulation and persistence of incentive salience attributed to reward cues....

Reposted by David Luque

Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · Sep 6

Finally! 🤩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n

Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.

Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).

Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.

Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles